This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Loving V. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

2051 words - 8 pages

On July 11, 1958 a couple of hours after midnight, Richard Loving a white man and Mildred Loving an African American woman were awakened to the presence of three officers in their bedroom. One of the three officers demanded from Richard to identify the woman next to him. Mildred, full of fear, told the officers that she was his wife, while Richard pointed to the marriage license on the wall. The couple was then charged and later found guilty in violation of the state's anti-miscegenation statute.
Mr. and Mrs. Loving were residents of the small town of Central point, Virginia. They were family friends who had dated each other since he was seventeen and she a teenager. When they learned that marriage was illegal for them in Virginia, they simply drove over the Washington, D.C. for the ceremony. They returned to Virginia and were arrested the following month for violating the anti-miscegenation statute, which was declared in the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. Commonwealth’s Attorney Bernard Mahon obtained the warrant for Richard Loving and “Mildred Jeter”. Mildred’s maiden name was on the warrant because in Virginia a marriage between a white and black was considered void. In October 1958, the indictments of Richard Loving and Mildred Jeter were bought before the court and on January 6, 1959, Richard and Mildred pled not guilty to the charges. Changing their pleas to guilty and waiving their right to a jury trial due to fear and optimism for a favorable punishment, the Lovings took the plea bargain. The Circuit Court judge that was presiding over the case, Judge Leon M. Bazile, did not see favor on them and sentenced them to one year in jail. Yet, at the same time in agreement with the plea bargain, Judge Bazile suspended the sentence for 25 years provided that the Lovings would leave the state of Virginia immediately and not return together for the whole period. There was a catch, for when the 25 year period ends they would still face the prosecution of the court if they ever returned. He concluded his decision with this quote:
Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no case for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did intend for the races to mix.
Later, in a plea to the supreme court of appeals in Virginia as to the constitutionality of these provisions in the decision, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia referred to The Equal Protection Clause stating that:
The definition of the offense must apply equally to whites and Negroes ... to the same degree. Thus, ... because its miscegenation statutes punish equally both the white and the Negro participants in an interracial marriage, these statutes, ... do not constitute an invidious discrimination based upon race.
The court also referred to its 1955 decision in “Naim v. Naim” as stating the reasons supporting the validity of the...

Find Another Essay On Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

Legalization of Same Sex Marriage Essay

2510 words - 10 pages : The Cultural Politics of Love and Law. New York: Cambridge University Press. "Citation." Def. 1a. Merriam Webster Online, Merriam Webster, n.d. Mon. 2 Dec. 2013 No. 395 Argued: April 10, 1967 --- Decided: June 12, 1967 Loving v. Virginia. 388 U.S. 395 Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. 1967. Cornel University Law School. Web. Mon. 2 Dec. 2013 WARREN, C.J., Opinion of the Court. Loving v. Virginia. 388 U.S. 395 Supreme Court of Appeals of

A New Era of Love: Interracial Dating and Marriage

1170 words - 5 pages , 1890-1934". Law and History Review 20 (2): 225–277. doi:10.2307/744035 Knox, D., Zusman, M., Buffington, C., & Hemphill, G. (2000). Interracial dating attitudes among college students. College Student Journal, 34(1), 69-71. Hunter, Cheyanne. "Pros and cons of interracial dating - Atlanta Race and Justice." N.p., 10 Nov. 2011. Web. 19 Mar. 2014. U. S. Supreme Court, Loving v. Virginia, 388 U. S. 1 (1967) Peter Enns, Exodus, NIV

The Supreme Court and Civil Rights

1147 words - 5 pages and condemned to one year in jail (1951), ("Loving v. Virginia."). The reason being they had dishonored the interracial marriage law in Virginia, though they had not married in the state. The judge gave them an option to leave the state for 25 years and not to come back before that time was over, which the Loving couple chose. However, about 4 years later the couple filed, “a motion in the state trial court to vacate the judgment and set aside the

The Supreme Court and Personal Civil Rights

1224 words - 5 pages ., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2013 "Richard Perry LOVING Et Ux., Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA." N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2013 “Segregation and Desegregation.” Supreme Court Drama: Cases that Changed American Equal Protection and Civil Rights (Part 2). Detroit: UXL, 2011. Student Resources in Context. Web. 24 Nov. 2013 “Supreme Court Upholds Affirmative Action Program, June 27, 1979.” DISCovering U.S. History. Detroit: Gale, 1997. Student Resources in Context. Web. 5 Dec, 2013 “The Supreme Court and Civil Rights.” The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Np, nd. Web. 03 Dec 2013

The Universal Right to Family

2048 words - 8 pages . Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 5 Mar. 2011. Human Rights Campaign. “Adoption Laws State by State." N.p., 2010. Web. Mar. 2011. Loving v. Virginia. 388 U.S. 1. Supreme Court of the U.S. 1967. FindLaw. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Mar. 2011. Morse, Jennifer Roback. "8 Is Not Hate: The Meaning of a Proposition." Rereading America. Ed. Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2010. 81-83. Print. Perry v

Support of Gay Marriage

1785 words - 7 pages -of-state.html?_r=0 Jones, Jeffrey M., "Same-Sex Marriage Support Solidifies Above 50% in U.S.,", May 13, 2013 Langbein, Laura and Yost, Jr., Mark A. "Same-Sex Marriage and Negative Externalities," Social Science Quarterly, June 2009 Loving v. Virginia, US Supreme Court, June 12, 1967 Perry, Kathryn, "The Cost of Gay Marraige - In Dollars and Cents

Interracial Marriage in the United States

1537 words - 7 pages , labeled unconstitutional and a violation of people’s rights. The landmark case Loving v. Virginia established the right of citizens to get married and the freedom to choose their spouses. It was not until June of 1967 that the U.S. Supreme Court finally declared anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional in the landmark case, Loving v. Virginia. Since Virginia did not allow interracial marriages, the Lovings, a couple composed of a African-American and

Why Gay Marriage Is Constitutional

2721 words - 11 pages . N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014. Goetting, Nathan. "GAY MARRIAGE IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. "National Lawyers Guild (n.d.): 138-44. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. King, Martin Luther. Letter from Birmingham Jail. Stamford, CT: Overbrook, 1968. Print. Lawrence v. Texas. 539 US 02-102 558. Supreme Court of the United States. 2003. Loving v. Virginia. 388 US 1-13. Supreme Court of the United States. 1967. Meezan

How an event in history has impacted me. Lovings v. Virginia

1004 words - 5 pages have one life to live and it should be spent with the spouse of our choice. Loving v. Virginia is a landmark civil rights case that has not only affected me, but my entire generation. Today you will find countless interracial relationships which in turn produce multi-racial children. The open display of mixing races would be a criminal act if it were not for the Loving couple and many other interracial couples who fought against racial injustice

The Battle Over Same-Sex Marriage

2260 words - 9 pages case Loving v. Virginia, which legalized interracial marriage, to argue that homosexuals should be allowed to marry whomever they want. Quindlen maintains that the Loving v. Virginia case is applicable to the modern-day fight for same-sex marriage because this is an issue of civil rights violations, much like the original case from 1968. In contrast, Barber, counters in “Interracial Marriage: Slippery Slope?” that Loving v. Virginia should not

The Risks They Took For Love

1143 words - 5 pages . Virginia, anti-miscegenation laws were declared illegal, yet marriage between African Americans and Caucasians was still illegal in 17 states within the United States (McClain). In contrast, not all interracial couples received negative support from their Caucasian counterparts, but in the south mixed couples were greatly discouraged. *Expand more on Loving v. Virginia *Find a better transition* Interracial couples risked a lot to be together and

Similar Essays

Christian Churches And Marriage Equality Essay

1569 words - 6 pages . Lippold. L. A. 20305. 1 Oct. 1948. Brown@50. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Mar. 2014. Loving v. Virginia. Supreme Court. 12 June 1967. Cornell University Law School. Web. 30 Mar. 2014. . "Freedom To Marry." International. Freedom To Marry, Inc., Mar. 2014. Web. 28 Mar. 2014.

The Lovings V. The State Of Virginia

1088 words - 5 pages Loving’s had no idea that this case would change so many lives in America. They weren’t out trying to set legal precedence or become civil rights advocates. As Mildred Loving explains that they just wanted to get back home. 29, 2001Race and the Human GenomeBy Hisham Aidi 388 U.S. 1; 87 S. Ct. 1817; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1082. LexisNexis Academic. Web. Date Accessed: 2014/05/20

Inequality In Love Essay

1070 words - 5 pages . New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2003. 165. Gale Power Search. Web. 31 Mar. 2014. "14th Amendment." LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2014. "Loving v. Virginia (1967)." Civil Rights in the United States. Ed. Waldo E. Martin, Jr. and Patricia Sullivan. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2000. N. pag. U.S. History in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014. "Loving v. Virginia 1967." Supreme Court Drama: Cases That

Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legal Essay

1640 words - 7 pages throughout the history of the United States, it is still a rite of passage that is either still illegal or carries a stigma for a large percentage of the population. Works Cited Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (US Supreme Court June 1967). Romer v Evans, 94-1039 (Colorado Supreme Court May 1996). Perry v Brown, 10-16696 (United States Ninth Circuit February 2012). Berger, J. (2010, August 4). Interfaith Marriages Stir Mixed Feelings