Machiavelli's List Of Virtues Essay

1293 words - 5 pages

Question: Machiavelli lists several virtues that all rulers should have. Describe in your own words what those virtues are. Do you agree with Machiavelli? Why? (Note that it is possible that you may agree with some of his virtues but not others.)

     Through his many years of experience with Italian politics Machiavelli wrote “The Prince”; a how-to guide for new rulers. We are given descriptions of what a leader should do to effectively lead his country. A leader should be the only authority determining every aspect of the state and put in effect a policy to serve his best interests. These interests are gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power. Machiavelli’s idea is that a ruler should use a variety of strategies (virtues) to secure his power. Machiavelli lists five virtues that a ruler should appear to have; being compassionate, trustworthy, generous, honest and religious. A ruler should possess all the qualities considered good by other people.
     A ruler should have a reputation of being generous, but not actually being generous. If you truly are generous your reputation could be damaged. A ruler who has a reputation as being generous will end up wasting all of his resources and money, causing him to tax the people to continue living plentifully. This will make the people hate him, and possibly turn against him. In the end this helps no one. “ So we see a ruler cannot seek to benefit from a reputation as a generous without harming himself” ( pg. 49) Being miserly is better than being generous. A miserly ruler may be perceived as miserly in the beginning, but he will eventually earn a reputation as being generous. A ruler who is frugal will eventually have enough money to defend himself and his people against danger, and undertake new initiatives without having to tax the people. By being miserly a ruler has greater power because he has money and with money comes great power, and with power you can dominate anything that you want, hence the phrase a person who has money is dangerous. Being mean allows a ruler to govern. This does not mean you should rob your people.
     Compassion, like generosity is also admired. But a ruler must be careful that he does not show compassion unwisely. A new ruler has to be cruel initially, because being a new ruler is full of dangers. If a ruler is too compassionate, and does not effectively punish disloyal people, they take the freedom to do what they like. A lack of cruelty will lead to disorder, chaos, murders and robberies. Some amount of cruelty is necessary to maintain order. A ruler should be both loved and feared, but this is difficult to achieve. If you must make a choice, it is much better to be feared than loved. Being feared is much safer than being loved. People are unlikely to overthrow a ruler that they fear, because they fear the punishment if they fail. “ Men are less nervous of offending someone...

Find Another Essay On Machiavelli's list of virtues

The prince Essay

1505 words - 6 pages ideas and opinions derived from many specific events in history to support and prove the numerous arguments of Machiavelli as he describes his perfect ruler. The thoughts and opinions of great minds can be immortalized with a pen and paper to teach and inspire new generations of thought for centuries after centuries, and The Prince is a collection of Machiavelli's revolutionary thoughts and ideals. His motives played a strong role in the way he

Nicola Machiavelli- The author and his times. (background Notes)

10304 words - 41 pages in his changing writing style. Much of the material in The Prince is presented in direct and simple language. With his carefully reasoned and logical arguments to sway the thoughtful reader, Machiavelli's political experience and his abilities as a scholar shine through; in these passages he is, in essence, a thoughtful and capable adviser counseling his leader.He can also be biting, sarcastic, as when he discusses the "virtues" of leaders who

Discuss Machiavelli's view on morals and politics in the Prince

2480 words - 10 pages greatly from the values that Machiavelli proposes.Much of Machiavelli's advice can be seen as a critique of the humanists' view of virtue. Although he agrees with the importance of attaining honour, glory and fame he disagrees with the conventional virtues. From Chapter XV to Chapter XXIII he looks at how a ruler should conduct himself towards others. This is the main part of the text which deals with morals or lack of them. He begins this section with


1252 words - 5 pages power. His three ideas that he felt a prince should do is to have the ability to act boldly, to protect his power and to appear unwavering while being flexible. Machiavelli taught that the way princes actually do govern often differs substantially from the way they ought to govern, according to medieval Christian virtues. His ideas are in stark contrast with traditional church teachings. Machiavelli discussed a multitude of topics in offering his

Ideas of Government in The Prince

2055 words - 8 pages Church and Pope. Machiavelli, however, realized that none of these systems could possibly work, and so designed his own ideology on what could make the perfect society. He argues that the actions and virtues of rulers, or “Princes,” should be based on what has worked throughout history, and should not be based on unrealistic expectations. This is a very scientific means of establishing a more ideal society, and as Machiavelli ultimately proves

Do philosophers or theorists have anything of value to offer in the conduct of politics?

2438 words - 10 pages virtues.If Socrates fit his system of government to an idealism that described the perfect civilization, Machiavelli's political philosophy evolved in the time he spent as a civil servant. Although Socrates spent his life as a philosopher, he never held a public office. Machiavelli, on the other hand was Chief Secretary and a head of the Second Chancery. His participation in national and external affairs let him study his own government and the

Comparing Machiavelli's The Prince and Plato's The Republic

1796 words - 7 pages Plato?s The Republic, he unravels the definition of justice.  Plato believed that a ruler could not be wholly just unless one was in a society that was also just. His state and ruler was made up to better understand the meaning of justice.  It was not intended to be practiced like that of Machiavelli's. Machiavelli, acknowledging this, explains that it is his intention to write something that is true and real and useful to whoever might read it

Machiavelli's Ideal Ruler, based off his book: "The Prince".

1581 words - 6 pages , was a guide for all the rulers (the book was intended for Lorenzo de Medici) of his time who wanted to gain power and to find solutions to their political problems. Machiavelli's writings in The Prince are concerned with the principles on how a state is founded and by what means the state can then be implemented and maintained. In the book many themes were expressed in order to fulfill the role of a prince but only an important few will be

Fatally Human (machiavelli And Willie Stark)

1020 words - 4 pages breaches of Machiavelli's advice, but he surely could not get away with both. As for his affair with Anne, Machiavelli believes what causes a "prince" to be "hated above all else is being rapacious and a usurper of the property and the women of his subjects; he must refrain from this" (61). Machiavelli places this objective at the top of his list; not only does he say "above all else" but he repeats at the end, as if we did not

American Government

904 words - 4 pages today although I feel our government has gotten out of hand. It is not as harsh as Machiavelli's ideas of government where he believes in striking fear in the people and never wavering from thoughts of war. Our government does protect us in many ways. Just as Machiavelli's government, we have a military that is ready to protect and serve us. We are always ready for war. So this is not to say that I believe that our government has completely

Virtue by Vice

1573 words - 6 pages Virtue is not an ambiguous term. It has strong ties to moral excellence. There are minor variations among virtues according to different, usually religious, value systems. However, virtuosity at its essence does not change. Virtue is the polar opposite of vice. This generally agreed upon definition is the one used in More's Utopia. Machiavelli redefines virtue and vice by extracting the element of morality from both. Doing good, or being

Similar Essays

Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 1527) Essay

1195 words - 5 pages principal types of governments: monarchies and republics. His focus in The Prince is on monarchies. The most controversial aspects of Machiavelli's analysis appear in the middle chapters of his work. In Chapter 15 he proposes to describe the truth about surviving as a monarch, rather than recommending superior moral ideals. He describes those virtues, which, on face value, we think a prince should possess. He concludes that some "virtues" will lead to a

Princely Power Essay

1617 words - 6 pages Princely Power Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince contains a very unique section entitled "Princely Virtues" in which Machiavelli takes on a how-to approach in regards to becoming a prince. The instructional qualities of the novel lead its reader to create in themselves an image of not the most virtuous, but in Machiavelli's eyes, the most effective prince. In the selections found in chapters 15-26, Machiavelli teaches his intended princely

Virtue: A Comparitive Essay Of Aristotle And Machiavelli

542 words - 2 pages virtuous because humans are naturally short-sighted and will judge by appearance rather than knowing the Prince and his true intentions. The intentions of any successful Prince must be for the sake of keeping power. On the contrary, Aristotle believes that humans practice virtues because embracing them are what it means to be happy. In this essay then, I will present a response that Aristotle would make to Machiavelli's claim above by examining each of

Persuasive Essay On Why Machiavelli's The Prince Should Not Be Required Reading.

645 words - 3 pages just as confusing, they are in a completely different format than The Prince. Shakespeare's plays are written in Old English, whereas Machiavelli's work was originally written in Italian, and translated into English - very confusing English.It is for these reasons that it is necessary to reevaluate the reading list for students of all ages. More practical, modern, and relative literature is available, and is just as worthy of classroom time as a book on philosophical politics that was written over five hundred years ago. So please, reconsider required reading, and place yourself in the shoes of your students.