Machiavelli’s The Prince And The Modern Executive

1990 words - 8 pages

The Prince and the Modern Executive  

  Few question The Prince’s place in the canon of western literature. That it marks a turning point in our collective history, the origin of the study of politics as a science (Pollock 43), is alone enough to warrant its classification as a "Great Book. Its author, Niccolo Machiavelli, a contemporary of Copernicus, is generally accepted as an early contributor to the scientific revolution, because he looked at power and the nature of sovereignty through the eyes of a scientist, focused completely on the goal without regard for religion and morals and ethics. Machiavelli taught that the way princes actually do govern often differs substantially from than the way they ought to govern, according to medieval Christian virtues. Sir Frederick Pollock wrote that in Machiavelli we find "for the first time since Aristotle, the pure passionless curiosity of the man of science. We find the separation of Ethics and Politics…Machiavelli takes no account of morality" (43). Machiavelli considers a successful ruler to be above morality, since the safety and expansion of the state are the supreme objectives. There had not been such a frank rejection of morality since the Greek Sophists. His ideas are in stark contrast with traditional church teachings. It is no wonder that The Prince was added to the Index of banned books and even today remains one of the most criticized and controversial books ever written. It is a scientific investigation into the tactics of retaining power. It is about application of power in the pursuit a greater goal. The Prince is, above all, about leadership. Though it is doubtful that Machiavelli realized the far reaching impact of his work. Its application is timeless and particularly pertinent to the modern business executive.

    Drawing a connection between Machiavelli’s states and modern day corporations is not difficult. A corporation has its king and its barons, its courtiers and ambassadors, its loyalists and its dissident elements, its allies and its enemies. What is important to our application of his principles of statecraft to the business world is not the superficial differences but the underlying unity. Modern corporations that are successful and well-managed do not necessarily operate in harmony with the personal morality of their employees and for the general good of their communities. Similarly, firms which pollute the environment or ask their employees to lie are not always forced into bankruptcy.

    The individualism and secularism that characterized the Italian Renaissance are dominant themes in Machiavelli’s thinking. His use of historical examples throughout The Prince demonstrates an extensive knowledge of Greek and Roman history and is consistent with the new-found love for antiquity of the Renaissance. Machiavelli was, in every sense of the word, a true "renaissance man." He appears to be remarkably well-educated, although limited finances probably prevented...

Find Another Essay On Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Modern Executive

The Prince As A Modern Polititcal Treatise

2618 words - 11 pages The Prince As A Modern Political Treatise By Shaier J. Sattar Written almost 500 years ago by the so called first political scientist in the world, Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince” brings forward a new definition to virtue. A definition which argues against the concept brought forward by the Catholic Church. Machiavelli did not impose any thoughts of his own rather he only

machiavelli and the prince Essay

1980 words - 8 pages Social Life in Medieval and Early Modern Italy                                          Nicolo Macchiavelli and The Prince      At the end of the 14th century, Italy was still politically organized by city-states

Realism and The Prince

2096 words - 9 pages and pleas for an eligible ruler in the future. He asserts that only Lorenzo de’ Medici, can restore Italy’s honor and pride. This chapter somehow reveals Machiavelli’s intention and purpose of writing The Prince. Among all the discussions in the book, several key concepts are brought up, such as power, goodwill, statesmanship, the evil human nature, free will and virtue. While I was reading and reflection on the concepts of the book, the

Prince And The Pauper

576 words - 2 pages "The reign of blood has ended! Long live King Edward, king of England!" The fictional classic novel THE PRINCE AND THE PAUPER, by Mark Twain, takes place in London England during the 16th century. The book is about a young prince named Edward Tudor and a young pauper named Tom Canty who switch places and experience each others lives.Tom Canty and Edward Tudor were both born on the same day. Edward to a reign of power and royalty, and Tom to a

Prince And The Pauper

944 words - 4 pages Critical review of The Prince and the Pauper Mark Twain is considered one of the world's greatest authors with both The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn to his credit. What is regarded as one of his lesser popular novels, first published in 1882, The Prince and the Pauper is a literature classic that has been read and enjoyed by many generations. This novel is difficult to criticize because it is written by one of

The prince and the pauper

1533 words - 6 pages The Prince and the Pauper This tale documents how a twist of fate can alter one's life. It begins with Edward Tudor (Prince, by birth) and Tom Canty (Pauper) switching clothes one day and, in turn, accidentally switching lives. The Prince must now endure the slums of the country in which his father rules. He is beaten, starved, and must beg for food. This aspect of the tale would have given others and me some satisfaction if the Prince proved to

Macbeth and Machiavelli's The Prince

888 words - 4 pages In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he stats that it is better to be feared than loved, but that one should avoid being despised and hated. With these concepts at hand we can compare these philosophies to one of Shakespeare’s most famous plays Macbeth. This play can be analyzed through two important characters Macbeth and Duncan. They both have their own tragic flaws and how they came to power. But Macbeth had gained his title illegitimately

The Prince

1830 words - 8 pages modern evidence but, it is evident that a majority of this book can be considered out of date. Cesare Borgia was a contemporary of Machiavelli’s Prince. In chapter seven of the Prince, Machiavelli claims many aspects of Borgia’s political career are discussed. He is the very embodiment of the ingenuity, efficacy, and manliness that defines Machiavelli’s concept of political virtuosity. After Borgia had conquered the area of Romagna, he is now

The Prince

1126 words - 5 pages “All the states, all the dominions, under whose authority men have lived in the past and live now have been and are either republics or principalities.” In Machiavelli’s, The Prince, timeless keys to a successful principality are examined. The keys are understanding human nature, respecting that nature, and reaffirming that successful leadership can exist in the same fashion yesterday, today, and tomorrow.     &nbsp

The Prince

1571 words - 6 pages A good ruler is someone who maintains control over his people without pushing them to mutiny. In Machiavelli’s The Prince a ruler has absolute control over them. This is unlike how, in most relationships, there is a struggle for power; one person always wants to be in control. Within a power relationship there is no contest who is in control—just an acceptance of power. The absolute superiority creates an inability for the inferior to rebel

The prince

1505 words - 6 pages or which they see him most delight in...Wishing, then, to present myself to Your Highness with some mark of my duty to you, I have been unable to find anything that I possess that I hold so dear or esteem so highly as my knowledge of the actions of great men, learned from long experience in modern affairs and from constant reading of ancient ones." (Machiavelli 12). From this statement, one sees that Machiavelli wrote The Prince partly to please

Similar Essays

Comparing Leadership In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar And Machiavelli’s The Prince

1467 words - 6 pages Caesar will not change his answer and his words are final. If he was someone who could easily be changed, then the population would start doubting his leadership abilities. Leaders are very similar in their ways, but the only things that will differentiate them from one another are there values and beliefs. Modern political leaders can derive more wisdom from Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, even though it was targeted mainly for royalty ruling. His

Machiavelli’s The Prince: Examples Of Machiavellian Leaders

2344 words - 9 pages politicians tell the people what they want to hear and not the truth. Interestingly, modern politics is based off of Machiavelli’s teachings in the Prince. Therefore, most politicians practice or use some of Machiavelli’s techniques. Not only did Machiavelli’s influence spread to modern politics but it also spreaded to modern business, such as big corporations. As before, there are many examples of Machiavellian companies. AT&T, being one

Comparing Thomas Mores Utopia And Machiavelli’s The Prince Macquarie University Politics Essay

1828 words - 8 pages Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince are both concerned with the  fundamental issues of how society works in hand with virtue in order to maintain itself. The goals behind the two works, however, differ considerably. The aim of Utopia is to exemplify the maintenance of a perfect society (More 1516, p. 32) and the goal of The Prince is to instruct a prince, or ruler, on how to sustain his state (Machiavelli 1532, Chapter 16). From

Charles De Gaulle’s "Political Style" In Comparison To Niccolò Machiavelli’s "The Prince"

1387 words - 6 pages order to be triumphant and achieve a desirable outcome. Although the novel was written centuries ago in the 1600s the information and advice it contains still remains prevalent today. In fact, when studying the history of selected political leaders, such similarities can be seen. One of modern history’s leaders that exemplifies and has used a handful of Machiavelli’s advice is Charles de Gaulle, military leader and president of France. Serving as an