"Men Without Hats: To Clone Or Not To Clone". A Pro Argument For Cloning, Arguing Against Charles Krauthammer M.D.'s Views On Cloning.

981 words - 4 pages

-Overview- A paper of mine written circa 1999 in response to several of Charles Krauthammer's views on cloning. You can search engine for his name to find his particular views on many subjects, including cloning.-Side Note- The "Men without Hats" part of the title was an ongoing side joke with the professor and i, it dosent have any particular meaning in this creative writing document.----------------------------------------------Men without Hats: To Clone or Not to Clone?----------------------------------------------"To clone or not to clone?" is the question of this argument. This conquest has been the aspiration of many scientists for hundreds, perhaps thousands of years. On the other hand, it is the fear of many religious/paranoid people everywhere. By us determining the value of human life; this will dictate the future of cloning indefinitely. I feel Krauthammer's opinion is exaggerated and unrealistic. I disagree with this author's point of view.The main fault in Krauthammer's argument is that he has an unrealistic view on human life. The subject of our value system makes his argument invalid. The current society and government view on life would prohibit the growing of "headless" humans for organ donors. The government has put laws prohibiting cloning, and severely restricting embryo/stem cell research.Embryonic cloning could prove a valuable tool for the studying of human development, genetically modifying embryos, and investigating new transplant technologies. Although these methods somewhat reflect the eugenics movement, they do differ vastly from the movement in the aspect we are not killing people to make our society "clean." We would simply be erasing the diseases and viruses that have plagued us for centuries.Many religious and paranoid groups do not even want us to venture into this realm, although the results of this research would force many of them to become hypocritical in their answers. I don't care how religious you are; if your child was going to die from a bone marrow transplant and you could save it by creating a genetically engineered brother to save him, you would do it. That's not question of religion, it's a question of human nature.It would take a severe catastrophic events to trigger the use of clones for body parts. I would foresee the use of cloning for body parts if some major virus was killing hundred of thousands of people, or a major war decimated around the same number of people. Right now cloning just isn't feasible. Although I don't see why it should be banned. There are many pros, and few cons.Since the process of cloning has not been perfected, there are many flaws. Many complications with aging of cells, and various mutations plague its process. Scientists will eventually perfect the art. Cloning should become an associated part of medicine. The Roslin institute was the first to successfully clone a sheep. Since animals have over 30,000 genes, this was a huge success.Cloning will be...

Find Another Essay On "Men without Hats: To Clone or not to Clone". A pro argument for cloning, arguing against Charles Krauthammer M.D.'s views on cloning.

to clone or not to clone essay

474 words - 2 pages must know EnglishМалахов ДимаEnglish is the language of computers and scienceРегинтов НикитаIf you want to get a good job you should know EnglishИванушкина КсенияEnglish is difficult for me but I want to know itСимилита Даша

To Clone or Not to Clone Part 2

794 words - 3 pages relationships, reproductive cloning would lead to discrimination against cloned individuals, reproductive cloning would decrease human diversity (Genetics & Public Policy). Although the issues have yet to be resolved on the morality of human cloning and probably will not be resolved for some time, the question still lurks in everyone?s minds ?is it moral to create human life in a test tube?? Should we allow science to progress in order to save lives and possibly create a better future for our children, or is it our moral duty to ourselves and our children to end the progressing technology? ?To clone or not to clone,? that is the question that only time will tell.

The Effects of Cloning on the Actual Clone

1353 words - 5 pages the world. (Roslin Institute, 1998) At the moment, there the cloning process has not improved or perfected enough to even consider human cloning as an imminent threat upon society. There are now, however, if you are in the livestock business, 40,000 dollar cloning produced cattle on the market. (Pence, 2004). And as for Dolly, Ian Wilmult?s goal was to produce a protein in the milk of cloned sheep that would be consumable by humans. (NISE 19997

Cloning - The Great Human Embryo Clone Hype

1671 words - 7 pages an abnormal sperm, and hormone treatments that have their own risks, are what prompted the cloning experiment in the first place (6 ). The procedure for cloning embryos was founded on a simple theory: It should supply multiple viable embryos with a reduced health risk to the mother (6).   This study demonstrated that experimental cloning or twinning of human embryos is potentially feasible as an aid to relieving infertility. According to

Argument Against Human Cloning

2467 words - 10 pages cloning proposes many arguments for each opposing side and can greatly impact the modern world based upon the research obtained through it. Whether or not that research is morally and ethically correct is the topic of most discussions in the genetics field. Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C

Argument Against Cloning

960 words - 4 pages will be killed.At the present time, cloning is experimental and unpredictable; it is not safe to use cloning techniques on human beings. These cloning experiments are unethical - they can do harm. Cloning may have bad results for the embryo and carries a high risk of abnormality in the child. Cloned animals show a high rate of abnormality or disability per live birth. It can put both the cell donor and the birth mother at risk. In one United

The Argument For And Against Cloning

867 words - 3 pages with the use of cloning on a large scale is the decline in genetic diversity. If in the future, when the process of cloning is prominent and suddenly, we lose the ability to clone and use natural reproduction for having offspring, then many of us will face lots of problems. In this case, a single disease could easily wipe out the entire population, as there is no genetic variation amongst them to face the problem of the disease individually.The

pro cloning

910 words - 4 pages Have you not ever wondered why cloning is a good thing? Cloning helps the world out more then it hurts it. All cloning should be legal worldwide. A few reasons why cloning should be legal is because you can cure diseases by cloning (Jefferis 21). Cloning can also make organs that used by a real human being (Jefferis 23). By cloning, you can also have animals produce proteins or drugs (“Why Clone”). First, Cloning is a good thing because you

Argument for Human Cloning

2277 words - 9 pages because if there are technologies that enable humans to artificially create mammal, sooner or later the same process will be performed on human. This points to the question, should human cloning be banned? (Cloning: An Overview). Even though there are numerous critics who believe human cloning violates human dignity, there should be an acceptance because it can be a solution to those who are affected with various diseases, it is essential for

cloning argument

1363 words - 5 pages decide what faith, or religion they will follow. Pro-cloning individuals feel that in a free society we know that we must tolerate some views that we do not agree with, this is what make our freedom so valuable, we have the right to choose. So when it comes back to that same question, is it ethical, in my opinion, choice is ethical. Work Cited: Bonsor, Kevin. “How Human Cloning Will Work.” How Stuff Works. May 8

"To Play or Not to Play... God?" This is a satirical essay that argues against using genetics to create human beings (through cloning, etc)

848 words - 3 pages be awed by our own creation. It would be great, just think about it: we build him, we are awed by him, he leads us, and then we - wait, what do we do then? Certainly we would not question our 'Frankenstein's Monster'. We could never excommunicate, arrest, or, God forbid, crucify a perfect being, could we?Oh well, on the bright side, those questions wouldn't have to be answered for a long time yet. Before questions like there could even be

Similar Essays

"To Clone Or Not To Clone...That Is The Question." This Essay Provides Reasonable Arguments Going For Human Cloning

528 words - 2 pages as a team. They may even find a cure for deadly diseases such as a cancer. Can you imagine how exceptional our world would be if we created another Steven Hawkings? Therefore, we are not harming anyone or anything with human cloning, but we are instead working for a better future by adding useful knowledge to the world.Lastly, human cloning offers infertile or homosexual couples children. There are many people who dream of and try to have

To Clone Or Not To Clone:

2027 words - 8 pages Catholic Church continues to expand its well-known views on reproduction and procreation since the days of Roe vs. Wade (i.e. where the United States Supreme Court ruled every woman in the United states has an absolute right to determine whether she will carry a pregnancy to term or abort it.) The Church continues to expand and express its opinions that cloning for any reason is against God and nature as He created it. Through Vatican issued

To Clone Or Not To Clone... This Is A Essay Against Cloning And Includes Some References To Genetic Engineering.. It's Loosely Based On The Persona Of A Political Leader

1476 words - 6 pages why information on how to clone or genetically engineer should not be released as it will increase the likelihood of such an occurrence. The human race is sad and power hungry in the fact that if they can do something, they will, just to feel superior. When this happens, more problems will arise.Mainly, there is the fact that the wrong person may gets their hands on the technology to clone. Using Hitler for example, he wanted to create a "perfect

To Clone Or Not To Clone?

1780 words - 7 pages sex could become obsolete; will it be possible for humanity to continue without dating or marriage anymore? All of these are very real possibilities in the biotechnical revolution. One can even clone an aging pet. Now one can clone Fluffy part one and have Fluffy part two waiting in the wings to take over when Fluffy one dies out. Does this mean that Fluffy one will no longer be missed? If this scenario is a possibility with pets what is stopping