Management: Fayol Vs Mintzberg Essay

2503 words - 10 pages

Critically discuss the extent to which Fayol's classical analysis of the management function has largely been made redundant by the more recent empirical studies of what managers actually do, such as that favoured by Mintzberg.

Introduction
Henri Fayol, at the age of 19, began working as engineer at a large mining company in France which eventually led to him becoming a director. Through the years that led on to this Fayol then developed his 14 principles of management which he considered to be the most important. According to Fayol, these principles indicate how managers should organise and interact with their peers. Fayol’s analysis is considered to be one of the earliest theories of management that has been created and therefore can be considered to be redundant. The many arguments considered in relation to Fayol have been considered throughout this essay as well as my own argument to gain an overall conclusion as to whether Fayol’s classical analysis of management has been made redundant.

Fayol’s perspective on management
Through personal experience, Fayol distinguished what he thought to be the prime functions of being a manager. It is said that he was the first to illustrate the need for the education of management (Brodie, 1967, in Fells, 2000) and in relation to management; Fayol’s perspective was what managers should do. Through categorising business activities into six activities, technical; commercial; financial; security; accounting and management; Fayol’s work focused on the latter category, management (Fells, 2000, pg.345).
Division of work, discipline, span of control, order and equity are just a few of the 14 principles of management that Fayol constructed from his analysis. He stressed that the number of principles, however, were non-exhaustive and that they are flexible and adaptable to every need (Fayol 1949, Brodie 1967, in Fells, 200, pg.346).
His perspective then developed further where he then acknowledged five “elements” or “processes” (Gray 1984 in Fells, 2000, pg.346) of management (Fells, 2000, pg. 346) and planning, organising, co-ordinating, commanding and controlling are these. Fayol suggested that these principles should be used by people within managerial positions when involved in their own management processes.

Mintzberg’s perspective on management
Furthermore, Mintzberg dismissed Fayol’s concept of management from the start and labelled it “folklore” (Mintzberg, 1975). Unlike Fayol suggesting what managers should do Mintzberg identified ten roles in which he believed a manager should undertake in order to be successful within their managerial position. He suggested within his perspective how managers actually behave. His ten roles were then condensed into three different roles, which are, interpersonal, informational and decisional roles - such as leader, entrepreneur, resource allocator and spokesman.

Reconciliation of the two theories
To an extent, I disagree with the statement...

Find Another Essay On Management: Fayol vs Mintzberg

To manage Classically or not to manage Classically

570 words - 3 pages believed to be relevant for educational purposes. Though this the theory has been questioned by a number of writers , most prominently being that of Mintzberg (1970,1971,1973,1975) who went on to criticise the validity and practicality of Fayol’s classical management theory even going as far to call it “folk lore” (Mintzberg, 1975) . In Mintzberg’s eyes Fayol had just described the manager as a decision maker or a motivator of staff beneath them

What Do Managers Do Today? - Essay

1380 words - 6 pages characteristics of what managers do through their influential roles. Supported by various experts such as Fayol, Mintzberg and Katz, the three views that have been extensively developed and criticised by researchers are comprised of functions, roles and skills. According to the Functions approach, it is suggested that managers perform various operations as they conduct and command the work of their subordinates (R. Duane Ireland, Robert Hoskisson

How relavent is Fayol's five functions of management in a modern meduim sized building firm?

3336 words - 13 pages as correcting the system. This happens everywhere in management. An example of this in a medium sized building firm could be restructuring the boardroom or hiring more staff. This is a good way in measuring how successful a manager you are.Fayol vs other theoristsTo see to what extent Fayols theory is relevant we need to consider ahat other theorists say about management. If we can find lots of similarities then we can conclude that Fayol

Taylor's Principles of Management

1601 words - 6 pages Management: 100 years old; Poised for the next century, Advanced Management Journal, 61(2), 35-41. Lamond, D. (2003). Henry Mintzberg vs. Henry Fayol: Of Lighthouses, Cubists and the Emperor’s New Clothes, Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 8(4), 5-24. Peterson, O. and Fleet, D. (2004). The ongoing legacy of R.L. Katz: An updated typology of management skills, Management Decision, 42(10), 1297-1308. Reh, F. (2010). Management

HOW RELEVENT ARE FAYOLS'S IDEAS TO MANAGIING INDIIDUALS AND GOUPS IN TODAY'S BUSINESS WORLD?

2349 words - 9 pages Henri Fayol was born in 1841 and died in 1925. After 30 years of an eminently successful career as a practitioner, Fayol devoted the remainder of his life, from 1918 to 1925, to promoting his theory of administration. Fayol was perhaps the first to note the need for management education. His Administration Industrielle et Generale was published in French in 1916. Fayol argued that all industrial undertakings precipitate activities that can be

Describe a manager's morning using Fayol's and Mintzberg's theories

1585 words - 6 pages management theories, Fayol and Mintzberg. These two theories will be used in analyzing this case study to help us understand Sam's morning and her job of getting things done through people. Other than that, the rational-functional perspective of management and the social-functional perspective will also be discussed in this essay.Henri Fayol (1949) had developed a way in approaching the managerial functions: planning, organising, commanding, co

The new managerial thoughts and organisational approaches like empowerment, delegation decentralisation and self-managed teams has ensued the changes as compared to the traditional approach

1683 words - 7 pages =cache:bAiHat12BTUJ:sol.brunel.ac.uk/~jarvis/bola/competence/fayol.html+Administrative+Management++fayol&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 (23rd September, 2003) 8. Mintzberg H., (1980) The Nature of Managerial Work, Prentice Hall 9. Taylor, F. W., Growth of Scientific Management, (online) http://www.accel-team.com/scientific/scientific_02.html, (23rd September, 2003) 10. Ward, M., (1995) 50 Essential Management Techniques, Ashgate Publishing 11. Weber, M., Bureaucracy, (online) http://www.kwandong.ac.kr/~choich/bureaucracy.html, (23rd September, 2003) 12. Self-Managed Team Design, Development and Implementation Services, (online) http://www.rvarmstrong.com/SelfManagedTeamServices.htm, (20th September, 2003)

A reflective paper on the four functions of management. And applying them to real life

1102 words - 4 pages manager we can learn that they are carried out continually in society and it is in fact managers that implement them. French managerial scholar Henri Fayol identified the roles of a successful manager. The "process approach" identifies these. It states that managers perform four main roles, those of planning, organizing, leading and controlling (Robbins, Coulter, 2003). Every management decision is a result of the application of one or more of

The Roots of Modern Management Principals

2383 words - 10 pages management. Mintzberg’s roles, Fayol’s functions and Katz’s skills are still very current and important to modern management. The reason such old principals are still around is because neither Mintzberg, Fayol or Katz created management they just created ways to explain and teach the art of management to others. This is clear as modern organisations like Bunnings still apply these principles and modern texts are still teaching these ways of

What is managment?

1756 words - 7 pages There is no one definition for the term management. However, Fayol (1916) defined the term management as;"To manage is to forecast and plan, to organize, to command, to co-ordinate and to control." Mc Ilwee.T and Roberts I, (1991): p.g117Management is not homogeneous and is undertaken at all levels of the organisation, as it is an integrating activity. Managers have to manage in order to achieve the overall objectives and strategy of the firm

"No job is more vital to society than that of the manager." (Henry Mintzberg). Discuss

1273 words - 5 pages carried out continually in society and it is in fact managers that implement them. French managerial scholar Henri Fayol identified the roles of a successful manager. The 'process approach' identifies these. It states that managers perform four main roles, those of planning, organizing, leading and controlling (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2001). Every management decision is a result of the application of one or more of these roles

Similar Essays

Business Essay

1858 words - 8 pages ) of management (Fells, Michael J.) and planning, organising, co-ordinating, commanding and controlling are these. Fayol suggested that these principles should give a person when involved with their own management processes. Furthermore, Mintzberg dismissed Fayol’s concept of management from the start and labelled it “folklore” (Mintzberg something). Instead of Fayol suggesting what managers should do Mintzberg identified ten roles in which he

The Managers Job Essay

622 words - 2 pages * The Manager's Job Author: Henry Mintzberg Publication Date: July, 1975 Presented to: * * Henry Mintzberg Dr. Henry Mintzberg has done PhD from MIT, joined McGill's Faculty of Management in 1968 and written many well known books in management ('Managers not MBAs', 'The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning' etc) Selection as Distinguished Scholar for the year 2000 by the Academy of Management and received many more honors and awards for his

Visual World, Real Market Essay

597 words - 2 pages world. A visual world with a real market, how creazy it is! Since our world can not keep up with the pace of renovation of Internet technology very well, it is too soon for us to combine the real life and visual world together.ReferencesFayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management, (trans. C. Storrs). London,Pitman.Lamond D (2003). Henry Mintzberg vs Henri Fayol: of lightouses, cubists and the emperor's new clothes. Journal of Applied

Henry Fayol And Frederick Winslow Taylor’s Contribution To Management Thought: An Overview

4985 words - 20 pages , how and when the work is to be performed is to be included in management plan. Taylor shorted the management to motivate the personnel not merely by giving orders, show the authority etc. but by selecting, teaching and developing the workmen and heartily co-operating with them. 7 FAYOL VS TAYLOR Attempts have been made to compare and contrast the work of Fayol and Taylor. The works of Fayol and Taylor are essentially complementary. Both