This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice Essay

2624 words - 10 pages

Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

Mandatory minimum drug sentencing is legislation passed by Congress in
1986 to create harsher punishments for drug offenders. These laws were
created at a time when drug use was beginning to rise dramatically.
This type of sentencing was meant to impose harsh, excessive sentences
on any type of drug offense, despite other circumstances. While these
laws seem good in theory, they were not well thought out. The creators
and supporters did not consider the negative consequences of these
strict laws. The injustices of federal mandatory minimum sentences
have been present for years in the United States justice system. These
laws are costly, unjust and excessive in our society.

First, the most obvious effect of mandatory minimums is what it costs
our nation financially. The sentences of drug offenders are now
extremely long, and keeping large numbers of people in jail for long
amounts of time is very costly. The U.S. taxpayers are the ones
suffering because they are the ones that are forced to pay for these
increasing costs.

The cost of keeping just one person in prison is incredible. The cost
of imprisoning just one person is on average 23,000 dollars per year.
It is less expensive to put someone through college for four years
than it is to incarcerate someone for four years. The amount of U.S.
tax dollars going towards prison costs is growing faster than all
other federal funding. Everyday 4.14 million dollars of U.S. taxpayer
money goes towards federal prisons and 1.51 billion dollars annually
(Cruel). These costs are continually and dramatically increasing. From
1986, when mandatory minimums were started, to 1997 the Federal Bureau
of Prisons budget increased by over 1350%, from 220 million dollars to
3.19 billion dollars (Drug). The population in prisons has radically
increased. From 1980 to 1999 the prison population has tripled. As
Eric Schlosser notes, “California alone holds more inmates in its
jails and prisons than do France, Great Britain, Germany, Japan,
Singapore, and the Netherlands combined,” (qtd in Easterbrook 57).
This, along with the excessive prison terms, has contributed to the
rise in the Federal Prison budget.

Mandatory minimums are the most costly and least effective way to cut
down on the use of drugs (Greider 12). While mandatory sentencing may
seem like the best way at first, in the long run money would be better
spent on standard sentencing and treatment programs. Mandatory
minimums are more expensive, predominately because of the high costs
of incarceration (Study). Rand’s Drug Policy Research Center performed
a study on the best cost effective way to reduce drug use. Their
results showed that every 1 million dollars spent on mandatory minimum
sentencing helps to reduce cocaine consumption by 13 kilograms....

Find Another Essay On Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

Mandatory Minimum Sentences are Cruel and Unusual Punishment

837 words - 3 pages passed a series of strict laws to keep illegal drugs off the street. What they did not know was how inhumane, cost ineffective and unconstitutional these laws would be. Welcome to the world of mandatory minimums. Since the Anti Drug Abuse Act was passed in 1986, the United States has been using a system of ‘mandatory minimum’ sentences which is a strict guideline for judges’ sentencing decisions. When a person is convicted of a crime in

A Call for a Revision of Mandatory Minumum Drug Laws

3353 words - 14 pages a big issue in the legal community currently regarding mandatory minimums. There is a huge disparity in sentencing penalties for the different forms of this one drug. Powder cocaine is the kind portrayed in film as white powder and crack cocaine is a rock that can be smoked and is much more potent. The term “crack” can be attributed to the crackling sound made when the drug is smoked, but in addition to smoking cocaine, it can also be snorted

Lit Review

1518 words - 6 pages the federal sentencing guidelines (and a critique of federal mandatory minimums). Stanford Law Review, 56, 1017-1049.Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2006: Volume I, 1-81.MacCoun, Robert J. and Peter Reuter, (2000). "Does Europe do it better? Lessons from Holland, Britain, and Switzerland" The Nation 269:8:28-30.MacCoun, R. (1987). Drugs and law: a psychological analysis of drug prohibition. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 497-512.Tonry, Michael, 1995. Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 81-95.

The House I Live In Movie Analysis

2363 words - 9 pages “criminal” required that the “criminal” serve “a minimum sentencing of typically 20 years”(Jarecki) due to mandatory minimum sentencing drug laws. Majority of these mandatory minimum sentencing laws have been enacted since 1986 and before August of 2012 according to a PDF found at FAMM.org (families against mandatory minimums). In this PDF it states that “Mandatory sentences [are] triggered whenever crime involves: 100 g+ heroine, 500 g+ cocaine, 28

Mandatory Sentencing

1776 words - 7 pages drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences. It is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences. Both the U.S. Sentencing Commission and the Department of Justice have determined that mandatory sentencing is not an effective way to deter crime. Studies show that mandatory minimums have gone downhill due to racial and gender disparities which caused

Ultra-Orthodox Deviation from the Status Quo Agreement & Subsequent Discrimination

1719 words - 7 pages creates a feel of aggravation that Ultra-Orthodox Jews somehow supersede secular, supposedly uniform legislation. In addition, with secular funds backing these independent Ultra-Orthodox institutions, the government is effectively paying for that which it opposes and rejects its mandatory supervision. Indignant secular Jews have grown tired of a perceived Ultra-Orthodox privilege in Israel based on their claim to religious supremacy and demand that

Alternative Sentencing: Money Well Spent

1394 words - 6 pages Type of Defense Attorney Matter in Terms of Producing Favorable Case Outcomes. Washington: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011. Print. Colker, Allison. Drug Courts. N.p. n.p., 2009. Print Families Against Mandatory Minimums. The Facts about Mandatory Minimum Drug Laws in Florida: A Failure of Public Safety, Public Health, and Fiscal Responsibility. Washington: Families Against Mandatory Minimums, 2010. Print. Florida. Dept. of

LAws are the solution

982 words - 4 pages prison systems because it means more life sentencing with a lesser possibility of parole for most offenders. The three-strike laws are a form of the Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Laws. The majority of the mandatory minimum sentencing laws apply to drug crimes. These laws limit the judicial discretion of all judges on drug cases. Individuals’ who are convicted of particular crimes must be punished in accordance to the Mandatory minimums laws

Prison Overcrowding: Causes and Solutions to Fix the Problem

2472 words - 10 pages least eighty-five percent of their sentences, thus ensuring that they will be out of their families' lives for a long period of time if they get a "common" harsh sentence. Groups such as "Families Against Mandatory Minimums" have been started because of the hurt and anger they have felt from losing their loved ones for several years. There are over three hundred and forty thousand prisoners in prison today for drug convictions. (3) A good percentage

Overcrowded Prisons

999 words - 4 pages minimum sentencing there is no chance of a plea bargain.The argument against mandatory minimum sentencing is , however, as strong as the argument against them. The main reason against this type of sentencing is what I spoke of in the introduction, overcrowded prisons. In a time when overcrowding in becoming a very major problem in prisons things like mandatory minimums only add to the problem. Judges are forced to put certain people away for a

The United States should decriminalize drugs

761 words - 4 pages and tobacco). Total, almost $14 billion dollars could be gained from a law that a majority of Americans disagree with. A better solution would be to legalize and tax cannabis and decriminalize the use of other controlled substances, instead having offenders attend a treatment program (which would vary on a case to case basis, with no mandatory minimums) and pay a fine that would subsidize or cover the cost of their treatment. Most treatment for petty or first time offenses would be cheaper outpatient programs. Repeat offenders would have to attend programs increasing in length, and eventually becoming inpatient programs.

Similar Essays

Three Strike Laws Essay

1825 words - 7 pages Three Strike Laws Mandatory minimums and three strike laws, are they really the answer to the crime problem America has faced for years? Many would say yes, including me, as long as it is for a violent crime such as murder, rape or arson; some feel that even theft, drug trafficking or possession, and burglary are all worthy of the 25-to-life sentence that can be carried under the mandatory minimums for three strike laws. A three

Injustice Of The Justice System Pertaining To African Americans

1036 words - 4 pages to minorities through punishment and sentences, selective enforcement of laws, and Mandatory Minimums.We currently live in a time when the government says that racism is illegal and non-existent, but all-white juries consistently hand out death sentences to innocent young black males. Just the statistics show that two-thirds of the two million Americans in jail/prison are African-American or Hispanic, and an Illinois study found juries were three

Negative Consequences Of Mandatory Sentencing Essay

891 words - 4 pages ability to become productive members of society. Rehabilitation programs are becoming scarce; the public money for these programs is being diverted into money for additional beds for the bulging prison population. Mandatory minimums are resulting in a losing war on drugs and over crowding in the prison system. As of 1999 almost 1.8 million Americans are incarcerated. Seven times as many women since 1980 are incarcerated largely due to new

Mandatory Minimum Sentences In Canada Essay

3597 words - 14 pages Society of Canada. O’Reilly, P. (2013) Case Stated in CC405 Class. Pritchard. (2013). A lesson for Canada as the U.S. turns against mandatory minimums. Globe and Mail. Roberts, J. (2007). Public Attitudes to Sentencing in Canada: Exploring Recent Findings. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice , 49 (1), 75-107. R. v. Smickle. (2012) ONSC 602 (CanLII), Retrieved November 15, 2013 from http://canlii.ca/t/fq2d0 Yu, J. (1994). Punishment celerity and severity: Testing a specific deterrence model on drunk driving recidivism. . Journal of Criminal Justice , 22, 355-366.