This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Mapp V. Ohio And The Fourth Amendment

918 words - 4 pages

The U.S Constitution came up with exclusive amendments in order to promote rights for its citizens. One of them is the Fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment highlights the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searches, and persons or things to be seized (Worral, 2012). In other words such amendment gave significance to two legal concepts the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures and the obligation to provide probable cause to issue a warrant. This leads to the introduction of the landmark Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio and the connection to a fact pattern (similar case). Both cases will be analyzed showing the importance of facts and arguments regarding the exclusionary rule and the poisonous doctrine.
In the fact pattern provided, Mark Quickdraw, a detective is conducting an investigation case whose main mission is to capture a drug dealer named Sally Martin. Detective Quickdraw relies on what he heard about the drug dealer. That leads him to believe that she will be selling cocaine in the street she lives in. In connection to his belief, that shows the reasonable suspicion he had towards the drug dealer. Followed by reasonableness, he sends an informant Sneak Pete to her residence with police money in attempt to buy cocaine. The informant comes back and hands over a small bag of cocaine he obtained from a man in the residence. He also informs the detective that he suspects the drug dealer to be having amounts of drug since he observes a white plastic bags and digital scales. Not satisfied with that evidence, Quickdraw requests a search warrant. He is told to wait, but his desperation grows even more as he sees two men entering her house. He responds to an immediate backup. Without a search warrant, his men enter finding a handgun and a baggy of heroin in her nightstand. Sally Martin is charged for gun possession due to a past felony and the possession of heroin. The highlight of the case is when her attorney deciphers that the evidence should be suppressed due to the violation of her Fourth Amendment.
In connection to the Quickdraw’s case, Mapp v. Ohio gave importance to the Fourth Amendment. The case was about illegal search and seizure conducted by police officers. According to the textbook, Criminal Evidence, Cleveland police officers kicked open the front door of Dollree Mapp’s residence (Britz, 2008). She requested a warrant from the police and they showed her a paper that stated a warrant. She placed it on her shirt and the police forcibly recover the paper from her. She was arrested and her...

Find Another Essay On Mapp v. Ohio and the Fourth Amendment

The Fourth Amendment Essay

3424 words - 14 pages of this case is that on appeal, the Court reversed the State Supreme Court's decision. The Court held that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extended to the States. Thus meaning, the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, and, the exclusionary rule, which prohibited introducing evidence of material seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment.After the case of Mapp v. Ohio, the courts held Mapp hearings to determine

The fourth amendment Essay

708 words - 3 pages invalid. This can be related to school, because if a student refuses to be searched they will be suspended, and there will be repercussions. However if you weren’t on school anybody could refuse a search unless the officer has a warrant. Your refusal to be searched would have no repercussions. The fact that you are on a school campus, should not infringe upon your Fourth Amendment rights. Although illicit substances are the main cause for the

Interpretations Of The Fourth Amendment

1148 words - 5 pages was found to be relevant (Find Law Legal Professionals Home Page 1968). Terry vs. Ohio, shows that we still to this day have the controversial issues of the fourth amendment and the meanings that follow with it and its' interpretations. The issue of the fourth amendment is in the news today more than ever before with the use of the now controversial Internet. House Republican Leader Dick Armey says that a new privacy law would be hypocritical when

The Fifth Amendment and Miranda v. Arizona

1781 words - 8 pages all the crimes. The police then used Miranda’s confession to convict him in court. While in prison Miranda appealed his case and eventually brought it to the Supreme Court. The court ruled five to four in favor of Miranda. The Supreme Court was correct in their ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, because the majority opinion correctly argued the fifth and sixth amendments. The dissenting opinion arguments regarding the fifth and sixth amendments were

The Fifth Amendment and Miranda v. Arizona

1918 words - 8 pages all the crimes. The police then used Miranda’s confession to convict him in court. While in prison Miranda appealed his case and eventually brought it to the Supreme Court. The court ruled five to four in favor of Miranda. The Supreme Court was correct in their ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, because the majority opinion correctly argued the fifth and sixth amendments. The dissenting opinion arguments regarding the fifth and sixth amendments were

The fourth amendment in criminal procedure

1987 words - 8 pages could not be tired without that evidence. The Mapp V. Ohio case is the most well known case associated with the exclusionary rule and the Fourth Amendment, because it demonstrates the rules perfectly. Agents of the law such as police officers need to have the right to be in a place searching and seizing things. If they are searching and taking things from a place without permission or a warrant that evidence that is found (if the defendant or

The Codification of the Fourth Amendment

1384 words - 6 pages future technological change. Several cases make apparent the court’s struggle to consistently apply the Fourth Amendment to growing technologies: Kyllo v. United States, United States v. Andrus, and !!!!!! In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the police used a thermal imaging device in order to procure evidence that Kyllo was growing marijuana in his home. With the information obtained from the device, they were granted a search warrant and discovered

The Mapp Exclusionary Rule and its Limitations

783 words - 4 pages The Mapp Exclusionary Rule Merriam-Webster defines exclusionary rule as “a legal rule that bars unlawfully obtained evidence from being used in court proceedings.” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) The Mapp Exclusionary Rule protects citizens from unlawful search and seizure by authorities. In order to protect the privacy rights of the public, any evidence obtained for a federal criminal case must be seized in compliance with the law. Federal

A Study of the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution

2377 words - 10 pages of a dwelling house, for which a warrant may be readily obtained, and a search of a ship, boat, wagon, airplane, automobile, or other movable vehicle in which it is not practical to secure a warrant because the object may quickly be moved out of the jurisdiction. (Carroll v. Maroney, 1970)Seizure without a search:The provisions of the Fourth Amendment and the provisions of the state constitutions protect persons from unreasonable searches and

The Future of The Fourth Amendment Concerning Unmanned Aircraft

2889 words - 12 pages how it effects the Fourth Amendment. It must be determined how unmanned aircraft are to be governed before they are used, because their use and any data obtain by unmanned aircraft could be opposed in court. Which leads to, what are the current laws governing the use of unmanned aircraft by law enforcement agencies? How the Fourth Amendment stands against UAS. State v. Brossart is the first known case involving evidence from an unmanned aircraft

Violating the Fourth Amendment Rights of Antoine Jones

1014 words - 5 pages innocent peoples sentence if made a slit mistake. Works Cited Noble, Andrea. "Defendant in Supreme Court GPS Case Pleads Guilty, Avoids Fourth Trial." Washington Times. The Washington Times, 01 May 2013. Web. 28 May 2014. "The Supreme Court Decides the GPS Case, United States v. Jones, and the Fourth Amendment Evolves: Part One in a Two-Part Series of Columns." Verdict. Web. 27 May 2014. "The Truth About Life Without Parole: Condemned to

Similar Essays

Mapp V. Ohio Essay

789 words - 4 pages way she should have gone to prison for the evidence that they found. And this should stand as a reminder for future police officers that they need to follow all the rules set forth by the 4th amendment and stop this from happening again. Just to save some paperwork the police officers cost them to lose this case and someone who should be in prison is free to do this again.  References Works Cited Mapp v. Ohio | Casebriefs. (n.d

Mapp V. Ohio Essay

1717 words - 7 pages United States a judicial remedy that is imposed by the courts to deter violations of constitutional rights. To enforce the Fourth Amendment we rely on the exclusionary rule, first adopted by the Supreme Court in 1914 in Weeks v. United States, and applied to the states in 1961 in Mapp v. Ohio.On May 23rd, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at Dolly Mapp's home. They had reason to believe that gambling paraphernalia and a possible

Mapp Vs. Ohio: Illegal Search And Seizure

1198 words - 5 pages charge and was held over to be sentenced. Miss Mapp and her attorney appealed the decision. Upon making its way to the Supreme Court, many important decisions were made. First, the court showed that the fourth amendment right of privacy is enforceable for the states through the due process clause that had already been selectively incorporated by the fourteenth amendment. They then went on to say that therefore the exclusionary rule

The Fourth Amendment Essay

601 words - 2 pages searching property without probable cause. Law enforcements can only search with a reason and after a search warrant has been written by the judge. The Fourth Amendment is part of the Bill Of Rights that are civil liberties not even the government can violate. However just because there are laws, doesn?t mean they haven?t been violated.The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is one of the most important Supreme Court decisions of the last century that violated the