This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Mapp Vs. Ohio: Illegal Search And Seizure

1198 words - 5 pages

Mapp vs. Ohio: Illegal Search and Seizure

The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is one of the most important Supreme Court decisions of the last century. Until this decision, the rights against illegal search and
seizure had no method to be enforced. Up until this time, previous cases at set precedents provided little or no protection from illegal searches and seizures for the
accused facing state prosecution. On May 23, 1957, Miss Dollree Mapp heard a knocking at her door (170 Ohio Street). When she asked who it was, three men
identified themselves as Cleveland police officers.

The officers stated that they believed a fugitive was hiding in her home. Miss Mapp told the officers that there was no one else in her home. They
asked her for entrance. Miss Mapp phoned her attorney, and was instructed not to let the police into her home. The police grudgingly left, and set up surveillance
around the home. Around three hours later, the police officers returned to Miss Mapp's residence, and was met by four additional officers as well. The officers gave
Miss Mapp little time to respond to their presence, and almost immediately forced entry through several of the entrances to Miss Mapp’s home. Miss Mapp's
attorney arrived on the scene to provide council, but was met by the police instead. The police held him outside, preventing him from meeting with his client. When
Miss Mapp was confronted by the officers, she demanded to see the search warrant. An officer held up a piece of paper, which is believed to be a fake warrant.
Miss Mapp grabbed the paper, and put it down her blouse. The police then forcibly tried to retrieve the "warrant" from Miss Mapp's blouse. They handcuffed her
for being "belligerent". The police then proceeded to search every room in the entire house. In the basement, they found a trunk, which they opened. Inside they
found materials that they considered to be “obscene”. They retrieved all the materials, and charged her with the possession of obscene material (Ohio Rev. Code,
2905.34: "No person shall knowingly . . . have in his possession or under his control an obscene, lewd, or lascivious book, magazine, pamphlet, paper, writing,
advertisement, circular, print, picture . . . or drawing . . . of an indecent or immoral nature . . . . Whoever violates this section shall be fined not less than two hundred
nor more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned not less than one nor more than seven years, or both." ), and took her into custody. Miss Mapp was indicted on
the charge, and went to trial. During her trial, no search warrant was ever produced. The judge stated that there was considerable doubt as to whether there ever
was a warrant in the first place. Even so, the evidence collected illegally was presented during the case. As reasoning, the case of Wolf vs. Colorado was cited,
which stated that when the accused is being tried in a state court, he or she does not have the protection of the exclusionary...

Find Another Essay On Mapp vs. Ohio: Illegal Search and Seizure

Search and Seizure Essay

1453 words - 6 pages exempted from Search and Seizure scrutiny and therefore from Poison Fruit analysis. Several more recent Supreme Court decisions extended the exceptions to the doctrine to include innocent police or state errors, such as good faith clerical errors in improperly drafted search warrants and honest misinterpretation on the part of police agents engaging in conduct they believe is constitutionally permissible.In 1961, the Supreme Court decided in Mapp v

Search and Seizure Essay

6195 words - 25 pages identify the person to be arrested or the thing to be searched and seized with particularity so as to leave no room for discretion on the part of the arresting officer in deciding who is to be arrested.Valid Warrantless Searches and SeizuresWhen a police officer conducts a search or an arrest without warrant, generally the search or the arrest is considered illegal. For example, a crime was committed within the community. One week after its

Search and Seizure

582 words - 2 pages Although people in the United States are entitled to privacy and freedom there is a limit to that privacy. State or federal officers are allowed where justified to search your car, house, property in order to seize illegal items such as drugs, illegal weapons, stolen goods just to name a few. When the police do searches it can be for various reasons it depends on the situation. They can have a search warrant to go into a premises and

Mapp v. Ohio and the Fourth Amendment

918 words - 4 pages violation of her Fourth Amendment. In connection to the Quickdraw’s case, Mapp v. Ohio gave importance to the Fourth Amendment. The case was about illegal search and seizure conducted by police officers. According to the textbook, Criminal Evidence, Cleveland police officers kicked open the front door of Dollree Mapp’s residence (Britz, 2008). She requested a warrant from the police and they showed her a paper that stated a warrant. She placed

Search and Seizure in Schools

1717 words - 7 pages searches in schools. The case, New Jersey vs. TLO, began after a teacher found students smoking in a school bathroom. After denying the charge, a school administrator demanded to see a students’ purse in which he found cigarettes and marijuana (Search and Seizure 596). After traveling through each of the courts under the U.S. Supreme Court and finding two cases in favor of the search and one against, the case finally went to the United States Supreme

Protocol for a Constitutional Search and Seizure

694 words - 3 pages is dispatched to a location where a law or in this case a noise ordinance is being violated and the officer recognizes illegal contraband, a search and seizure can be enacted without a warrant. The reasons for this action are the officer is rightly present and the contraband can be seized because it is “in plain site” and there is probable cause, for it is reasonable to believe that a crime is being committed. The “plain view doctrine”5 have

Search and Seizure that People See in The Media

985 words - 4 pages that a “stop and frisk” may be conducted without violating the Fourth Amendment’s ban on difficult searches and seizures if two circumstances are met (FindLaw | Cases and Codes. (n.d.)). Officer Smith can exercise the right to a “Stop and Frisk”, given to her through the Supreme Court’s decision on the Terry v. Ohio case of 1968. The Supreme Court governed its constitutional for an officer to stop and pat down a person that may have reasonable

The Public Schools' Right to Search and Seizure

814 words - 3 pages from state to state as the 4th amendment has been modified to meet public school safety. Legislatures decided that there needs to be some modification of the level of suspicion of illegal activity needed to justify a search. They also decided that there's a need for a balanced between the students and the school setting. The 4th amendment has been modified from where you need probable cause and a warrant to be searched or seized. To the point

Terry vs. Ohio – Stop Question and Frisk

912 words - 4 pages The Stop and Frisk program, set by Terry vs. Ohio, is presently executed by the New York Police Department and it grant police officers the ability to stop a person, ask them question and frisk if necessary. The ruling has been a NYPD instrument for a long time. However, recently it has produced a lot of controversy regarding the exasperating rate in which minorities, who regularly fell under assault and irritated by the police. The Stop

Comparing the Search in Plato's Allegory of the Cave and Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio

1561 words - 6 pages The Search for Truth in Plato's Allegory of the Cave and Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio    The novel Winesburg, Ohio by Sherwood Anderson has many themes that present themselves throughout the book. One such recurring theme is a search for truth. The characters in the book do not fully realize that they are searching for truth, but they do feel a vague, "indescribable thing" that pushes and prods their minds to actualize a higher plane of

Rogerian argument as to why we as U.S. citizens need better clarification of the probable cause definition surrounding search and seizure laws

1102 words - 4 pages committed a crime."Prior to the framing of our Constitution, in regards to search and seizure laws, the government had virtually unlimited power to believe, right or wrong, that any illegal items they were looking for would be found. To protect against abuses that come with this kind of power, the framers of our constitution added a probable cause requirement" (Probable Cause 1).The Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution reads as follows

Similar Essays

The Exclusionary Rule Protects You From Illegal Search And Seizure

2494 words - 10 pages through the illegal search and seizure of the defendant’s home. In this case, the prosecutor’s Fourth Amendment right was evidently violated. An incident like this caused the Supreme Court to extend the Exclusionary Rule to require all states to adopt the rule in state courts as well. Through later years, the Supreme Court’s position on defending the Exclusionary rule has changed which explains the exceptions that appear on the Exclusionary rule

Mapp Vs Ohio Essay

1670 words - 7 pages determined that the evidence had not been taken from the defendant’s person by use of brutal force against the defendant. They also stated that there was no law in the state of Ohio that prevented the use of illegally seized evidence, which was also stated in wolf v Colorado, In which the court held that in a prosecution in a state for a state crime the fourteenth amendment doesn’t prevent the use of evidence obtained by an illegal search and seizure

Mapp Vs. Ohio Essay

1739 words - 7 pages matter how someone gains the evidence to prosecute a criminal; the only thing that should matter is weather the person did it or not end of discussion.Implications:Map vs. Ohio in my view transformed police practices and culture nationwide. Even though the original idea of the exclusionary rule originated in Weeks vs. United States, Mapp vs. Ohio was a far more infamous case do to the broad reach of the rule to different cases. To skeptics, the

Search And Seizure Essay

1162 words - 5 pages was obtained during an unlawful search, it cannot be admitted and must be dropped due to the exclusionary rule. The trial case of Mapp vs. Ohio declared that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. As a result, “[t]he Exclusionary Rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution…applies to