This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Marxist Theory And Sport Essay

1538 words - 6 pages

This essay will be an attempt to bring together the ideas from our class readings about the Marxist sociological perspective as well as insight from other readings to further my understanding of Marxism and its applications to sport. I will lay the groundwork for the theory then proceed with how his theory is applied to accessibility issues in sport, distribution of power in sport and commercialization of sport.
Basics of Marxist Theory
The most widely used political and ideological system of thought is that of Karl Marx. Marxism is a set of ideas trying to provide an explanation for human society. Although a little over a hundred years old his theories and thoughts have led to coups, revolutions and new waves theories and academics. As well, it is this systemic theory that has led many academics to look at the way they teach, discuss, write and even look at the way the world acts and thinks, even within their own small worlds. Within the world of sport the ideological views have no real place however it is possible to equate the views of Marx to the idea of sport.

Marxism is known as the interpretation of the thoughts of Karl Marx (1813 - 1883), a German social theorist and political revolutionary. Karl Marx wanted to understand the politics, culture and economics of the newly emerging nations within Europe. He emphasized the leading role of the economy in society as a whole as well as in societal parts, known as superstructures. These superstructures are non-economic aspects of society, i.e. culture, religion, social life, education, religion, politics and social institutions. Marx identified society as consisting of two classes: The so-called Bourgeoisie and the so-called Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie is a capitalistic, wealthy and powerful minority consisting of aristocracy and upper class members meanwhile the Proletariat, also known as working-class, holds the majority of societal members who are poor, semi- or unskilled workers. The Bourgeoisie owns the entire means of production and wealth, therefore they are powerful and hegemonic. Their hegemony is maintained because only they have access to the financial and productive means. Their ideologies, i.e. their thoughts and beliefs, are hegemonic and influencing as they have the power to establish them in society (Rigauer, 2000).
In contrast, the Proletariat is alienated from and by the Bourgeoisie. The working- class has virtually no power and influence, financially and politically. The original sense of work has transformed from earning money to feed, socializing and pleasing one's own interests into an exploiting tool of the Bourgeoisie to maintain the capitalist's wealth and therefore power too. Improving one's own position within their social hierarchy in society is impossible for the Proletariat: there is no social mobility, meritocracy (a system of social stratification based on personal merit) and/or ladder-system, as the class being born into will already determine the position in...

Find Another Essay On Marxist Theory and Sport

Theory of marxism and sports Essay

854 words - 3 pages sided view of Marxist theory and sport. However,                                                         the commonalities that arise between capitalism and the development of

Education in Sport Essay

965 words - 4 pages research tries to assess what changes occur as a result of participation in interscholastic athletes. Other approaches from a Marxist and critical theory perspective have challenged the underlying assumptions of 'equality' in society and how sport can help to perpetuate social class race and gender inequalities, and encourage practices such as dieting, drug taking and aggression which endanger physical and mental health. In particular, feminist research has revealed the way sport can reinforce patriarchy as the natural order of social relationship between male and females.

The Importance of Distinction in Literary Theory and Criticism

1385 words - 6 pages Szeman). The boundaries between the two, criticism and theory, blur according to Groden et al, however the boundary between their approaches is much more distinguishable. New Criticism and Marxist theory are examples of two different approaches to literary criticism. Both approaches share the same objective, in that they look to better understand literature, but their paths diverge on how exactly they go about this. It is the disparity between the

The failure of Marxism in Russia

2095 words - 8 pages Iain Pearson, 1st year, Modern History (BA Hons)'Far from being the creature of ideology, in its essential features the Soviet state defied Marxist theory,' Discuss.When the Tsarist regime in Russia was overthrown and the Bolshevik party under Lenin ruledas a single party government, it was claimed by many that a Marxist regime had beenestablished. Many within the Bolshevik party were firm believers in the Marxist theory andthought that the

Marxist Criticism

1343 words - 5 pages possible to make a rough comparison between the Marxist model of base and superstructure and the Freudian model of unconscious and conscious. Works Cited Eagleton, Terry. Marxism and Literary Criticism. London: Metheun Books, 1976. Selden, Ramden. A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1985. Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

Communist Ideology in The Bolshevik Party from 1917-1934

1072 words - 4 pages the Communist Party had not achieved this stage. However, according to Marxist theory, Lenin’s policies did in part follow the policies that Marx advocated almost seventy years before the October Insurrection. Marx believed that in order to create a communist state, a “dictatorship of the proletariat,” was required beforehand. The basis of Lenin’s policies between 1917 – 1921 and later Stalin’s policies from 1929

How relevant is the Marxist critique of capitalism to the analysis of the modern international system?

2463 words - 10 pages “failed in that it sought to promote in extreme form of social equality at the expense of liberty” (1992, p. 273). This leads to the following question: is Marxist critique of capitalism still relevant to analyse the modern international system? One thing is to refute Marxist theory along with its feasibility as a whole, and another is to refute its academic value intended for the analysis of the international system. For this reason, this work aims

5(b): How far were the roles of Bismarck and Cavour decisive in the unification of Germany and Italy?

2071 words - 8 pages When the Tsarist regime in Russia was overthrown and the Bolshevik party under Lenin ruledas a single party government, it was claimed by many that a Marxist regime had beenestablished. Many within the Bolshevik party were firm believers in the Marxist theory andthought that the Soviet state would agree with Marx's ideas. There are some modernhistorians who agree with this view, embracing the ideas of equality and fraternity andbelieving that

Marxist Theories

973 words - 4 pages This historical connection of Marxist theory with conflict theory presents an interesting paradox of a Marxism reared in the womb of theoretical structures to which it was, and is, seemingly largely opposed. Marxist theory has in common with conflict theory an interest in explaining both law and criminal justice but rejects the multi- group conflict image of society and endorses a power- elite model of society, in which social, economic, and


2014 words - 9 pages The key theme of Marxist geography, is that spatial patterns in the world are inherently uneven, which can be explained and analysed using fundamental economic theory (Cresswell, 2013). Capitalism is the current economic ‘base’ that the majority of Western countries use. Marxist geographic theory suggests it is this ‘base’ that completely determines the ‘superstructure’ of the entire society run on top of it (Williams, 1991). It explains spatial

A Marxist Critical Approach to Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby

1726 words - 7 pages Capitalistic society. These principles being ‘commodity fetishism’ and ‘reification’ are useful aids in interpreting and understanding the core themes that run throughout the text. Marx did not see the class system to be the regular upper, middle and lower generalization that it is so often seen in the Western world today. Conversely, Marxist theory states that “the way we think….largely conditioned by the way the economy is organized” and that the

Similar Essays

Marxist Literary Theory And Criticism Essay

1718 words - 7 pages , concerned with the sub-text in literature. He combined many theories in his criticism, including structuralism, deconstruction and archetypal. Marxism as he believes "subsumes" all other interpretive modes when it comes to political interpretation, which exposes the political unconsciousness of the text. Thus he seeks the allegorical meanings in texts. (Cuddon 496)The very rapid growth and development of the Marxist theory and criticism suggests

Health Care And The Marxist Theory

1029 words - 5 pages child needs a transplant, however his medical insurance doesn’t cover the costs of the surgery. Marxist theory argued that the problem is not just about access to medical care. It is the capitalist economy that defines health and medicine. Under the umbrella of this system, “the main goal of medicine is not health but profit. The profit turns doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical industry into multibillion dollars corporations.”(Society, the

Marxist Theory And Oedipus The King

1345 words - 5 pages Marxist Theory and Oedipus the King       "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" (Marx and Engels 2). This excerpt, taken from Karl Marx's and Friedrich Engels' The Communist Manifesto, explains the two primary classes found throughout most of Europe during the era of the Industrial Revolution. These classes were the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The former were known as the "exploiters" and the

Marxist Theory And Class Relations In Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde

1050 words - 5 pages Within the text of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Robert Louis Stevenson portrays a complex power struggle between Dr. Jekyll, a respected individual within Victorian London society, and Mr. Hyde a villainous man tempted with criminal urges, fighting to take total control of their shared body. While Dr. Jekyll is shown to be well-liked by his colleagues, Mr. Hyde is openly disliked by the grand majority of those who encounter him