This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Medical Testing On Prisoners, Not Animals

2558 words - 10 pages

Medical testing is a common thing. Everybody knows the importance of it. The thing is not everybody knows how a lot of the experiments are conducted. For the people who do not know animals are abused and mistreated for the sake of medical research every day. Even though animal research has played a key role in the advancement of medicine it is still inhuman, because only 6% of animals are used for medical testing. (About My Planet) Prisoners should be used in the place of animals for the advancement of medical history. There have been multiple cases and stories where prisoners have been abused through medical research, which the reader will realize as this paper is being read. All of these incidents with the prisoners are not as nearly graphic or inhuman as animal testing. Animal testing is cruel, they have no choice, whereas prisoners would have a choice. Prisoners on death row should be able to volunteer for medical testing and scientific research, rather than animals that have no choice.
The best example is the generally accepted principle that when one person commits a murder, they forfeit their own claim to such rights. These people are condemned to different levels of punishment according to the law. (Prisoners) The punishment to be eligible for research would be defined as those who are sentenced for life without parole, or those who are on death row. The research that would be conducted on the prisoners would only be for the purpose of the development of vaccines and cures for diseases that have no other medical treatment.
Getting prisoners to volunteer for experimental treatments can reduce time for animal testing and begin on human subjects earlier, decreasing the total time for approval from the FDA. Death penalty trials are very expensive and so if prisoners volunteered for medical research then they would save time and money for the state. (Gera) With the money saved the state could afford to replace old, broken down highways with new ones. The state could also use the money to support schools in need or use it to better the lives of the people who are financially unstable. The states could also use the extra money for rehabilitation centers and for classes to help people learn the terrible effects of drugs and alcohol and the violence that it leads to.
Some odd years ago attitudes about medical testing were different from current opinions of today. In the past, infectious diseases killed many people, so the doctors and researchers worked steadily to invent cures for these dreaded diseases and they tested many different cures for theses ailments. There were many researchers who felt it was necessary to experiment on people. They felt that only animal testing was not sufficient. They chose to use humans that were incarcerated. These prisoners did not have the full rights of civilized society (Stobbe, Mike). Since these researchers have sadly passed away so have the ideas and beliefs of testing on prisoners.
In the 1950’s...

Find Another Essay On Medical Testing on Prisoners, Not Animals

Cosmetic testing on animals, is it necessary?

647 words - 3 pages times the animal dies because the testing freaks them out and they go crazy and no one can calm them so they have to put them down. Cosmetics tested on animals should be banned because they use exotic animals, it is dangerous, and costly. When scientists have exotic animals, they may or may not realize that they are taking from their natural habitat. When exotic animals are torn from their environment, it causes them to have

The Controversy of Testing on Animals

1187 words - 5 pages . There are also groups of individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but they defend animal testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for disease. Incidentally cosmetics companies kill millions of animals every year to test their products. Some of these companies state they test on animals to establish the safety of their products and ingredients for consumers. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not require animal

The Rights of Testing on Animals

1190 words - 5 pages living creature gets injured or be sent to the death bed. For some of my student surveys they said that yes testing on animals is wrong although they found testing on humans is cruel, and it is not necessary to test on either. “There is no evidence that animal experiments were essential in making major medical advances, and if enough money and resources were devoted to animal-free alternatives, other solutions would be found.”(

Testing on Animals: Wrong or Right

1483 words - 6 pages experimentation is minor. Scientists also point out that although other types of experiments are used whenever possible, such experiments are not always adequate. For example, testing a drug on isolated tissues or organs will not show how the drug affects the body as a whole. Animal experimentation is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. Animals are being used for just about everything. They are tested on so

should testing been done on animals?

704 words - 3 pages , we both have a functioning brain, we both have pain receptors, we both have emotions. The way we are treating animals is unfair and unjust and it would not be acceptable if we did human testing, so why do we do testing on animals? Because according to understanding animal research “We share 95% of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for the human body.” There is still a 5% difference between mice and humans which can make the

Experiments on Animals Should Not be Banned

2962 words - 12 pages Experiments on Animals Should Not be Banned (word count includes paper outline) Technology and animal testing have provided the human population with many advancements in the past century. Every opportunity to embrace these advancements should be used for the betterment of the human population. It is often an argument based on personal opinion, but once the facts are analyzed, the affirmatives of animal testing outweigh the rationale

Is the Testing of Products on Animals Humane?

2416 words - 10 pages well-being. This experiment on the pregnant dog is a blatant example of motherly love, which begs the question: Why would a human mother not instinctively act in this way, too? As Jeremy Bentham states, “The question is not, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” (Evans). Testing on animals is inhumane and callous; consequently, it should be abolished. Much controversy surrounds the humanity or inhumanity of using

Animal Testing is Necessary, but Should All Testing of Pharmaceuticals be Carried Out on Animals?

931 words - 4 pages should be tested on animals as alternative methods don’t allow for testing of effects across a whole organism.The alternative method such as growing cell cultures can only determine if the drug is toxic or effective on a cell. It can not determine the side effects such as vomiting, rashes, bleeding and strokes which can occur from some drugs (Kristina Cook, 2006) It would be unsafe to distribute a drug if the side effects were not known. “The

When is drug testing not nearly enough? This essay is about the pre-employment tests that are being used in order for an applicant to get a job. It focuses on drug testing and psychological testing

1822 words - 7 pages ? Companies are going deep down even further to make sure that their potential employees are competent for the job. Psychological testing is causing quite the stir in businesses lately.Drug testing has been used for many years. Drug tests are given to potential employees to make sure that they are not abusing or using any type of drugs. Using drugs makes employees less aware and inhibits their abilities on the job. Many injuries from work places are

Human Guinea Pigs

2281 words - 10 pages only legal but also moral to violate prisoner's human rights and that it's acceptable to treat them as animals for medical experiments. The use of prisoners in medical research is about exploitation and profit. However, one must consider the long-term effects and outcomes of prisoner research on society and health care. Large portions of money will be put into risky experiments among prisoners, which takes away from our health care system

Animal Testing

1017 words - 4 pages that require living animals with non-animal techniques. (Three R’s) Today any test on a living animal that could cause it pain would require an anaesthic or painkiller to be given to the animal. This is insures that the animals are not suffering when these tests are done. Another thing to consider when deciding about animal testing is the type of animals used in laboratory tests. When most people think of animal testing they have a

Similar Essays

Medical Testing On Animals Essay

697 words - 3 pages strikes a person every 45 seconds.The Centers for Disease Control estimate that 70-80% of the commondiseases killing Americans are preventable given a responsible dietand lifestyle. Drug testing on animals is inaccurate and does notbenefit humans or animals at all. Animals including, but not limitedto, dogs, cats, mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, rhesusmonkeys, imported primates, owls, deer, sheep, llama, and cattle arecommonly used for

Testing Drugs On Animals Essay

755 words - 3 pages Why are animals used as test subjects of medications that the human race will eventually rely on? The answer lies in all the advances that have arisen due to the ongoing testing. From these tests we have created cures for many diseases. However, these tests tend to be very unreliable in some areas. When testing Penicillin if we had just tested it in Guinea Pigs we most likely would have declared it a toxic drug.Medical testing on animals has

Genetic Testing On Animals Essay

2111 words - 8 pages the public. It is true that scientists are constantly testing new drugs every day, and are always trying to find a cure for diseases. Now, if a scientist discovers or makes a cure for cancer, and it is tested and approved, then is it not in their moral obligation to promote and provide this drug for the public? Scientists are what the public depends on to help them out. So when something is discovered or prepared it is in the duty of the

Conducting Medical Research On Animals Essay

1448 words - 6 pages career. Peter Singer who is an Australian Philosopher, focused on the animal liberation and wrote a book about it published in 1975. Singer brings up the point of discrimination, he says that testing on animals rather than some humans is the act of being discriminant. At some point of Animal Liberation, Singer mentioned that scientist targeted animals to do experiments on because they don’t know what is in store for them, they do not have the mental