Drug Debate Essay

2860 words - 11 pages

Drugs Debate

"Junk yields a basic formula of "evil" virus: *The Algebra of Need*. The face of "evil" is always the face of total need. A dope fiend is a man in total need of dope. Beyond a certain frequency need knows absolutely no limit or control. In the words of total need: "*Wouldn't you*?" Yes you would. You would lie, cheat, inform on your friends, steal, do *anything* to satisfy total need. Because you would be in a state of total sickness, total possession, and not in a position to act in any other way. Dope fiends are sick people who cannot act other than they do. A rabid dog cannot choose but bite."
There is a large variety of recreational drugs available today and it is evident that they do not all have only detrimental effects. There are essentially two categories of drugs: mind expanding drugs and mind constricting drugs. It might also be useful to consider a category of drugs which are neither mind expanding or mind constricting, though, it would be difficult to find any recreational drugs which would fit in this category. The division of categories should be based on how the drug affects intellectual stimulation. The drugs in the mind expanding category should broaden the scope of perception and knowledge for the user. The drug should educate the user and "expand" the user's mind. The drugs in the mind constricting category should deter the user from learning, and even if one did claim to gain some sort of knowledge from the high, the knowledge, in the end, would amount to meaningless, confused thought. The rare drugs which stimulate violence, such as angel dust, must definitely be considered mind-constricting because not only does the user not gain knowledge from the experience, but the user destroys self-control and liberty and triggers desires to act immorally. This division of drugs into categories does seem to be of the nature of platonic perfectionism but the ideology is not entirely based on this ethical theory and some arguments might seem to conflict with its philosophy.
Using mind constricting drugs leads to immoral outcomes and therefore, mind constricting drugs must be illegal in order to at least minimize the amount of such outcomes. Making mind constricting drugs illegal prevents people from using substances which can only lessen one's quality of life and inevitably, destroy many societies. The use of mind expanding drugs cannot produce direct or indirect immoral outcomes and in fact educates the user. Drugs that are mind expanding or neither mind expanding or mind constricting must be legal. To make these drugs illegal would only unnecessarily infringe on people's liberty.
Forming laws against the use of mind constricting drugs is actually necessary for providing liberty to citizens. It is generally the case that in retrospect, a previous user of a mind constricting drug, when sober, or even in some cases, when high, regrets consuming the drug. The opening quote of...

Find Another Essay On Drug Debate

Substance Abuse Effects on Children Essay

979 words - 4 pages assumes increasing control of the individual’s behavior as the pattern of drug use approaches addiction (Abadinsky, 2011). Impact on Children: Alcohol and substance abuse/addiction affects the entire family. It is a progressive disease often characterized by broken promises, lies silence and hidden feelings. According to Tracy (1991), “maternal substance abuse has sparked an intense debate among child welfare

Global Debate and Public Policy Challenge

2136 words - 9 pages GLOBAL DEBATE AND PUBLIC POLICY CHALLENGE ID: XX30189 TO: THE GOVERNMENT OF UGANDA FROM: UGANDA HARM REDUCTION NETWORK SCENARIO: A TIME FOR UGANDA TO ACT REASONABLY ON DRUG POLICY What is Uganda Harm Reduction Network? Uganda Harm Reduction Network is a civil society organization established in 2011. Its main focus is to create a safe and secure Ugandan society that recognizes and protects the health, social, economic and human rights

Drug Testing of Student Athletes

1049 words - 4 pages has caused a national debate that still persists. The debate hinges on the right to privacy of the athlete and whether such testing is constitutional under the U.S. Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure" (Siedentop, 1998, p. 149). This issue has been presented in front of many courts, resulting in different rulings.A student athlete drug testing case, in an Oregon school district, resulted in a U.S. Supreme Court

summary of piece

681 words - 3 pages Surface examination of gang related violence, one would concur that it is because of poor socioeconomic status. However, Dan Gardner claims that drugs are the primary reason for the gang violence in his piece “The Missing Piece to the Gang-Violence Debate.” Although he acknowledges the said points above to be significant in that debate, he stresses that the element which is the black market drug trade is directly related to gang violence in

The War On Drugs in the USA

855 words - 3 pages them a way to gain economic and social success. They would not have to enter the illegal drug trade looking for a way out of the slums. Drugs are an issue of government and political debate. Lower income families will deal drugs trying to make a better life for themselves, but instead end up being addicted and committing crimes to feed their habit. In the United States 9% of whites live in poverty, compared with the

Can They Really Ask For Your Urine?

562 words - 2 pages There is a great debate about whether or not companies should be allowed to test its employees for drugs. Individuals using the utilitarian form of ethics would likely feel that arbitrarily testing employees is a direct violation of an employee's right to privacy. Unless an employee is showing signs of drug and alcohol abuse, employers do not have the right to violate an employee's privacy. On the other hand, individuals that subscribe to the

We Need Mandatory Random Drug Testing in Public Schools

1888 words - 8 pages , school-based Mandatory-Random Student Drug Testing could lower the rate of drug use in our communities it could create destructive, disrespectful teenagers (Barrington 49; Russell168). OPPOSED TO SCHOOL DRUG TESTING There has always been serious debate on whether drug tests are really appropriate in today’s public schools (Evans 452). Based on national survey results there were no significant difference in drug use in public schools with drug

Illicit drugs use has to begun to undergo a process of normalization in Britain: Assess the argument for and against this thesis?

2419 words - 10 pages survey).in 1998 the percentage was high among young people, this is because maybe due to depressions and burdens of failed life抯 take 20 to 24 years old people into drug and on the other hand there have done a lot for drug young people to keep them away from drugs in these years.There is always a debate on normalisation of illicit drug use. According to home office figures and other resources we see that the percentage of drug use is quiet

Legalization of Marijuana - Persuasive - Against

875 words - 4 pages Strategy calls for more treatment in the criminal justice system to break the cycle of drugs and crime.At root, the debate over drug legalization boils down to a question of risk. Studies show that the more a product is available and legitimized, the greater will be its use. If drugs were legalized, the cost to the individual and society would grow astronomically. Removing the criminal status associated with drug use and sale would not make such


1767 words - 7 pages the possible life saving benefits that could be gained. Thalidomide has been the topic of debate since its uses as a treatment of certain cancers has been discovered. # The drug was first introduced in the Europe. Thalidomide was prescribed to pregnant women to try and combat morning sickness. Thalidomide was also used as a sleep enhancer in other patients. It was not until 1961 that the drug was linked to the horrific malformations such as

Should Welfare Recipients Be Drug Tested?

1286 words - 5 pages There is an ongoing debate over whether or not welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive the benefits. Both sides of the argument have merit. Those who oppose the idea of drug testing say that it is unconstitutional and violates the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, they claim that this law stereotypes and discriminates against those from low socioeconomic demographics, implying that because they are poor, they must be drug addicts

Similar Essays

Illicit Trade And Drug Trafficking Proving To Be A Major Problem

1328 words - 5 pages to control. Drug trafficking also brings with it the problems of organized crime money laundering, corruption, and violence. In 1999, the United Nations Economic and Social Council warned that the international drug trade was brutal, dangerous, and ruthless for those involved with its actions, as well as those trying to enforce restrictions against it. In the debate over the international illicit drug trade, many have argued that the current

Illegal Drugs And Its Impacts Essay

1380 words - 6 pages sparks the debate between prohibition and legalization. The most widely abuse drug in the United States is marijuana, or cannabis. It has been used since ancient times in South and East Asia. It spread quickly to the Middle East, and later to North Africa. In 1545, the Spanish brought the plant to America. The cannabis plant was grown to produce fiber until it was replaced by cotton in the late 1800s. Between the 1850s and the 1940s, marijuana was

Against Drug Testing In The Workplace

1736 words - 7 pages Abstract The issue of drug testing in the workplace has sparked an ongoing debate among management. There are many who feel that it is essential to prevent risks to the greater public caused by substance abuse while on the job. However, others believe that the costs far outweigh the benefits and that it is an invasion of privacy. Putting all ethical issues aside, evidence presented in this paper supports the latter. The costs of drug testing

Drug Testing Essay

1177 words - 5 pages state, in part because some state constitutions provide more protection than others do for students' privacy rights (ACLU, 2003). The issue of drug testing has caused a national debate that still persists. The debate hinges on the U.S. Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure.The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. "The Court set out a three-part test