The argument in my essay can be found in a building paragraph that culminates in the thesis. The sentences that best illustrate my argument are as follows:
One such research study performed by Peter Leeson, an economics professor at George Mason University, postulates that hackers can be grouped into three classes: (1) good hackers, (2) fame-driven hackers, and (3) greedy hackers, based on their motivation (Coyne, Leeson 3). While this approach of separating the components may be appropriate for understanding many complex problems, it can be detrimental to grasping the multifaceted aspects of a hacker. To understand hackers, what motivates them, and how to stop them, we must ...view middle of the document...
In studying this phenomenon, Kelley noted that the cause behind drug abuse in youth is the developmental time variance between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system (106). The limbic system, responsible for feelings of reward, grows exponentially faster than the prefrontal cortex. As the prefrontal cortex is responsible for controlling the limbic system, it is biologically impossible for an adolescent to truly comprehend the repercussions of their actions. Additionally, it is very difficult for an adolescent to control the impulses received from their overly developed limbic system (Kelley, 106).
This scholarly research takes full advantage of the academic knowledge I have gained from courses attended here at George Mason University and, giving credit to the authors, the citation for this research is as follows:
Kelley, Brian M., John J. Graybeal, and James J. Mahoney. Substance Abuse Across the Lifespan: A Biopsycosocial Approach. 4th ed. Redding: BVT, n.d. 2013. Print.
In designing the research question that would ultimately be the guide to my thesis, I had to better understand what the problem I was hoping to solve. In the beginning, my question was too broad for a research project of this scope. To limit this, I began to brain storm to understand what it was that I wanted to know and how I could use this knowledge to join a conversation in my chosen field. This lead to defining a current issue that I had disagreement with and gave me an opportunity to show the reader a different view existed. In doing so, my thesis was able to be formed using the counter argument to my own view without fear of weakening my own stance.
The brainstorming provided my valuable insight into my own view that provided an avenue to research for views that strengthened my own in multiple disciplines of study.
Drafting and Revision
One of the difficulties of working in an interdisciplinary field of study...