Microsoft Monopoly Essay

902 words - 4 pages

Microsoft Monopoly

This paper will show my opinion of Microsoft being branded a monopoly. I feel this example shows supply and demand in addition to monopolistic competition. This entire ordeal is over a free browser that Microsoft includes with windows for free and gives out on the internet for free just as Netscape and most other browser companies do. The government feels that Microsoft is creating a demand purely for their products by forcing its browser on suppliers and controlling prices. I have yet to see where Microsoft is charging extraordinary prices for any of these free programs nor do I see how Netscape, in using the governments definition, a "monopoly" itself, is "being forced out of business" by Microsoft's free browser. Remember: the charge is against including Internet Explorer with Windows, not the Windows monopoly itself. It is much better to have one operating system than 20 or even 2. Software compatibility, technical support, and setup are much more simplified with one operating system. Programs today are specifically designed to be "Windows compatible." Would you rather have 20 (local) phone companies, each with a different line and number running into your house or one, as is the case now? Internet Explorer brings browser competition to a market that is essentially monopolistic itself. Internet Explorer gives Netscape a competitive product where before virtually none existed. The purpose of antitrust laws is to prevent only harmful monopoly. Microsoft's operating system near monopoly is harmful in very few ways.

Nor is Intel's chip near monopoly harmful, nor is Netscape's browser near monopoly. Other reasons easily explain how Microsoft came about to its size and how new companies constantly spring up in the computer industry. Computer software is a very volatile industry. To succeed in this industry all you basically need is a good program and a way to offer it for sale. All they have to do is make a program and copy it on a disk. Since making an extra disk containing the program costs all of 2 cents, it is more costly for the software company to print the box and manuals, than it is to make one extra disk. But it does cost Microsoft to develop a new program. No matter how cheap a disk is, capital investment such as salaries, factories, storage, and programmers always exist. Even though development costs are sunk and additional production costs are nonexistent, other costs are incurred. Besides, supply and demand determines where a price will fall. Another thing about the computer market is its ever-changing program market. For all we know, anyone literate in programming may develop a better program than Windows. If consumers like...

Find Another Essay On Microsoft Monopoly

Is Microsoft a Monopoly? How has Microsoft's Monopoly affected consumers?

3004 words - 12 pages assignment have been checked for viruses and reported clean.________________________________________21.0 Is Microsoft a Monopoly? 21.1 The Relevant Market 21.2 Market Share 31.3 Barriers to Entry 41.4 Availability of Substitutes 52.0 Has Microsoft Exploited its Monopoly Power? 52.1 Restrictive Licensing Agreements with Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) 62.2 Bundling Internet Explorer with the Windows Operating System 72.3 Bundling Windows Media

Microsoft: Thank Goodness it is a Monopoly

660 words - 3 pages Microsoft: Thank Goodness it is a Monopoly Many people, with the government are trying to label Microsoft as a monopoly. Why is there any delay going around doing that? There is no reason to brand Microsoft as a monopoly. There is part of monopolistic competition and supply-demand acting on this case. The whole trial is about the free internet browser, Internet Explorer, that Microsoft gives out free and includes with its Operating

Antitrust Laws and whether or not Microsoft is a monopoly. Usa v. Microsoft plus bibliography

1074 words - 4 pages highest possible amount of money for its product. The major difference between a monopoly firm and one in a competitive industry is that the monopoly will have greater control over the price it charges for the product, even though this control is never absolute. The monopoly firm has more freedom than a competitive firm to adjust price as well as production in order to achieve a max profit.In 2000 the Computer systems software mogul Microsoft had

Microsofts Monopoly

1082 words - 4 pages the Intuit and Microsoft merger was voided, a federal judge ruled Microsoft a monopoly. Microsoft controlling the personal computer operating systems was declared a monopoly. This ruling gave the Government a victory in the anti-trust suit against Microsoft. The only defense filed on Microsoft's behalf was that Microsoft's actions have not hurt the consumer. Thomas Penfield Jackson, the U.S. District Judge, said no to the defense plea of

Micronopoly

1162 words - 5 pages Micronopoly?Although by strict definition software giant Microsoft Corporation cannot be described as a monopoly, there has been much talk and controversy over this particular subject matter. There have been various complaints that Microsoft has used unfair business tactics to build an illegal monopoly and consequently has become the fifth largest company in the United States of America with a net revenue figure for the last financial year of

United States V. Microsoft

1224 words - 5 pages Charges raised by US Government against MicrosoftIn 1998, a case was filed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and twenty US States against Microsoft. The charges which were raised against Microsoft were:- That Microsoft Violated of section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in monopolization through a series of anticompetitive acts designed mainly to maintain its monopoly power (The acts related with web browsers and Java). Section 2 of

U.S vs. Microsoft

605 words - 2 pages restrictions were put on Microsoft to keep them from interfering with any other competition and also to help some competition build software that will work just as well as Microsoft's with Windows. "As a result, the market for PC-compatible operating systems -- in which Microsoft unlawfully maintained its monopoly -- will not return to a competitive environment, and the mandate of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals will be thwarted"(1) The settlement basically makes it a little more fair for other competing companies. Microsoft still owns their own desktop systems and the still hold the keys to the next generation in computer technology.

The Microsoft Antitrust Case

1111 words - 4 pages The case against Microsoft was brought buy the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as several state Attorneys General. Microsoft is accused of using and maintaining monopoly power to gain an unfair advantage in the market. The case has been under observation for a long time, but the Justice department is having trouble coming up with substantial evidence against Microsoft. Specifically, the Department must prove:That Microsoft has monopoly

The Microsoft Antitrust Story

1611 words - 6 pages The Microsoft Antitrust Story One of the most significant cases in the business world is the US vs. Microsoft. In this case the US asserts that the business practices used by Microsoft create an unfair and dominant market and make them into a powerful monopoly. On the other hand, Microsoft argues that it is being unfairly punished for its success. This case is important because it will greatly affect the economy, other large

Bill Gates: History of Microsoft

2096 words - 8 pages the CEO of the company. In 1998, Microsoft was taken to court in the case of United States vs. Microsoft. Microsoft was being referred to as an “abusive monopoly” at the time of the court case. In 2001 the ruling of the court was partially overturned by the Federal Court of Appeals but later decided in 2001 by the U.S. Department of Justice. (Evans & Schmalensee & Nicols, 2005) From the court case to present day 2014, Microsoft has

Government Regulation of the Microsoft Corporation

1744 words - 7 pages specific party. Not only does the outcome affect the Microsoft Corporation, but it also affects the rival companies and the consumer. Though not as eminent, the outcomes may also affect the future decisions against any other companies, possibly committing the same violations as Microsoft. The Sherman Act was the first law that allowed the federal government to regulate interstate commerce. Sections 1 and 2 define a monopoly or trust power and

Similar Essays

Microsoft Monopoly Essay

1642 words - 7 pages IntroductionDespite the fact that almost all of us use at least one piece of Microsoft software nearly every day, criticism and complaints about Microsoft are commonly expressed. We are here to argue that Microsoft has achieved this status by using unfair business tactics and creating a monopoly.According to Webster's dictionary, a monopoly is "the exclusive control of a commodity or service in a given market". It is important to realize that

Microsoft Monopoly Essay

645 words - 3 pages , there are three major browsers: AOL, Netscape and Microsoft'sInternet Explorer.When Windows 98 came out, it already had Microsoft'sInternet Explorer installed, compared to Netscape which users had to pay $50 for the program before being acquired by America Online.Basically Microsoft is being sued for having an illegal monopoly over personal computer's operating system and repeatedly quashed competition to preserve its market domination. After

The Microsoft Monopoly Essay

1650 words - 7 pages The Microsoft Monopoly I. Introduction United States vs. Microsoft is one the largest, most controversial antitrust lawsuits in American history. Many claim the government is wrongly punishing Microsoft for being innovative and successful, arguing that Windows dominates the market because of the product’s popularity, not because of malpractice by the parent company. Others argue in favor of the government, claiming that Microsoft’s

Microsoft: Entrepreneurial Success Or Monopoly? Essay

2280 words - 9 pages MS-DOS shipped; Imposing minimum quantity commitments on manufacturers; Signing contracts for greater than one year; Tying the sale of MS_DOS to the sale of other Microsoft products;(Maldoom 1) Although these penalties look to put an end to all of Microsoft's monopolistic practices, some people think that they are not harsh enough and that Microsoft should have been split up to put a stop to any chance of them forming a true monopoly of the