Miranda Vs. Arizona Essay

600 words - 2 pages

Miranda vs. Arizona:

     This case had to do with an Ernest Miranda who raped a Patty McGee*. After extracting a written confession from the rapist about the situation, Miranda’s lawyer argued that it was not valid since the Phoenix Police Department failed to read Miranda his rights, also in violation of the Sixth Amendment which is the right to counsel. Some factors that helped support Miranda’s arguments were that the suspect had requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with a lawyer; the suspect had not been effectively warned about his right to remain silent; and an incriminating statement must have been given by the suspect. The author of the Arizona court’s decision, former U.S. Senator and Arizona governor Ernest W. McFarland, said that Miranda had not requested a lawyer at the time of his detention and therefore was not entitled to the protections offered by such thins as in the Escobedo vs. Illinois case.
     Two months after the nation’s highest court agreed to hear arguments in the case of Miranda vs. Arizona, John Flynn and John Frank submitted their outline of the case and legal arguments in support of their position. They continued their argument that Ernest Miranda’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated by the Phoenix Police Department: “The day is here to recognize the full meaning of the Sixth Amendment,” they wrote. “We invoke the basic principles (that) ‘he requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings against him.’ When Miranda stepped into Interrogation Room 2, he had only the guiding hand of Officers Cooley and Young.”
     Because of the four other cases tied to Miranda and the large number of amicus briefs filed in the case, a second day of oral arguments followed on March 1. That day, the justices honed in on the Fifth Amendment aspects of the case, which pleased...

Find Another Essay On Miranda vs. Arizona

Miranda v. Arizona Essay

1206 words - 5 pages Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark case because now almost everybody knows about this case because of the Miranda Rights that were a direct result of this case, and the Supreme Court’s ruling. The Supreme Courts ruling that it was against Miranda’s rights, then because of this decision they made the Miranda Rights. The Supreme Court was correct in the ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, which they ruled in favor of Ernesto Miranda because his fifth

Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement

1577 words - 6 pages The "Miranda rule," which makes a confession inadmissible in a criminal trial if the accused was not properly advised of his rights, has been so thoroughly integrated into the justice system that any child who watches television can recite the words: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney" Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona

The Right to Appointed Counsel in Decisions of the United States Supreme Court prior to Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

1804 words - 7 pages The right to appointed counsel in decisions of the United States Supreme Court prior to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) From the Judiciary Act to incorporation doctrine In the landmark decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) the US Supreme Court stated in the name of Chief Justice Earl Warren that “…He [accused] has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning

This essay is about the Gideon vs. Wainwright case, in which the 14th amendment was based upon.

515 words - 2 pages the famous Miranda vs. Arizona case in 1966, a major part of these basic rights (If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you before questioning begins) would exempt if not for the Gideon vs. Wainwright case of 1963. As a prerequisite case to Miranda vs. Arizona, the Gideon vs. Wainwright case became one the most important court cases of the 20th century, as rated by Time magazine.51 year-old Clarence Gideon was accused and later

Law Enforcement and Miranda Warnings Case Analysis

1284 words - 5 pages interpreter, but the officer could then speak to the subject without violating his 5th Amendments. Miranda vs Arizona is the land mark case that every Law Enforcement agency in the United States goes by. The Supreme Court of the United States looked at four main cases that had to do with custodial interrogations. In these cases the suspect was shut off from the outside world and questioned by law enforcement. Law enforcement did not make sure that these

Supreme Court Cases

1211 words - 5 pages court found that Milligan could not be treated as a prisoner of war when for the past twenty years he had lived in Indiana, and had also been arrested there and wasn't a resident of any of the states in rebellion.Miranda Vs. Arizona The litigants involved in the Supreme Court case Miranda vs. Arizona were Ernesto Miranda and the people of the state of Arizona. The events that led to the trial were that of a kidnapping and sexual assault occurred

Judicial Process of the Supreme Court

1167 words - 5 pages Supreme Court. For instance, Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954 was one of the most controversial cases that the Supreme Court had to resolve; it violated the Equal Protection clause of the fourteenth Amendment. The case that violated an individual right was the case of Gideon vs. Wainwright in 1963, which violated the Sixth Amendment in a criminal case for the defendant. The case of Miranda vs. Arizona in 1966 is another

This essay is about Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, Warren Court Justice, Civil Rights. 3pages, 623 words. No works Cited.

633 words - 3 pages previous twists of the Constitution that focused solely on the belief that "separate but equal facilities did not imply any type of racial inferiority. In 1966 Warren and his court had another major decision to deal with, "Miranda v. State of Arizona." The case dealt with criminal suspects and their rights. The court's decision was that criminal suspects had to be informed of their rights before questioning. Warren and the Supreme Court also ruled

Interrogations, Confession and Admissions in the Criminal Justice System (Interrogation Policies used by Police today)

1843 words - 7 pages could it have been obtained by any means of direct or implied promises, no matter how slight. The issue at hand, in this case, involved the totality of circumstances in assessing the volunteerism of the confession.The next issue at hand when dealing with custodial interrogations is Miranda. Miranda was developed due to issues involving the case of Miranda v. Arizona. The Miranda process was established to insure that the suspect was adequately

How The Warren Court Liberalized America

1287 words - 6 pages being subject only to laws established for the good of the community with regard to freedom of speech. The case of Miranda v. Arizona, Ernesto Miranda, charged with rape, kidnapping and robbery was not informed of his rights before the police interrogation. He allegedly confessed to committing the crimes, had not finished the ninth grade and had a history of mental instability. Miranda had no Counsel present. Soon the Supreme Court ruled that

Judicial Branch: The Government's Ear

1266 words - 5 pages have been extremely important and provided many the law changes that gave the American people a few more steps closer to the equality and that we so desperately wanted to obtain. Cases like Marbury vs. Madison and Miranda vs. Arizona caused changes in existing laws because they were proven to need better specification. Plessey vs. Ferguson was a case between a white-skinned African American and the State because he sat in the front of a train

Similar Essays

Miranda Vs. Arizona. The Supreme Court Decision Detailed The Principles Governing Police Interrogation: The Miranda Rights.

1505 words - 6 pages against you in a court of law". Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda vs. Arizona remains the subject of debate, and has had a great impact on law enforcement in the U.S.On March 13, 1963, eight dollars in cash was stolen from a Phoenix, Arizona bank worker. Eleven days earlier, in Phoenix, Arizona, an 18-year-old mentally disturbed woman was kidnapped and raped. Police detained Ernesto Miranda, a 23-year-old man, for committing the theft but

The Case, Miranda Vs. Arizona Essay

810 words - 3 pages -1-Of all the cases in the Supreme Court there seem to be some that just more people seem to talk about as having a big part in American history. One of these court cases I feel would have to be the Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436.Ernesto Arthur Miranda was arrested in his home of Phoenix, Arizona in the year 1966. He was accused of kidnaping and raping a Phoenix, Arizona, woman. Apparently when he was arrested he had not read his rights given

How The Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Spurred The Supreme Court To Specifically Outline The Necessary Aspects Of Police Warnings To Suspects.

1215 words - 5 pages In 1963, an 18-year-old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case, (Miranda vs. the State of Arizona), and arrested Ernesto Miranda, a mentally unstable man. Miranda, who was 23-years-old at the time of his arrest, confessed that he had kidnapped and raped the woman. By confessing to the crime, Miranda was convicted of kidnapping and rape. However, when Miranda was arrested he was not advised of his

Miranda V. Arizona Essay

943 words - 4 pages James wells Wells 1History 1302Irigoyen26 March 2014Miranda v. ArizonaIn March 1963, a man names Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix Arizona, with the belief that he raped an 18 year old female. He was heavily questioned and interrogated, during this time he had admitted to committing the crime and gave a written statement which he signed; he went as far as to identify the girl that he had raped. He wrote in his statement that he was not