This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Moral Actions By Philosophers Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill

1174 words - 5 pages

In the making of my own argument on the elements that justify a right or wrong action, I will reference two of the most influential philosophers, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In order to make this paper easy to follow, I intend to focus on one of the arguments formed by each of these men. I will evaluate how both of Kant and Mill’s principles fits into the morals of right and wrong. Kant gives us a categorical imperative that urges one to Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law (Kant), and Mill states that actions are right as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Mill). Lastly, I will briefly formulate my own position on the components of a morally right action. I find Mill’s view of utilitarianism somewhat conflictive with the idea of morality. Based on the notion that utilitarianism calls “right” the actions that promote greatest happiness, for one self and for the whole, it can be said that utilitarianism allows murder (for whatever reasons it may be) and therefore this view is incompatible with our assessment morally acts.
When we find ourselves conflicted in a difficult decision-making process, a Kantian would advise us to evaluate the outcomes of our decisions and think whether we would want to have such actions made acceptable universally. If we cannot imagine living in a world where innocent individuals, regardless of their status, meet death to pay for the crime of another, then we ought not to take such actions against an innocent individual. Otherwise, the result would only lead to a world, where the true criminals roam free while many innocent lives are jailed or executed. This effect could also create a presence of insecurity in society, since all innocent individuals would fear becoming the scapegoat for a committed crime. By further following a Kantian’s thought, putting an innocent life to death to appease a wider public implies that the innocent individual was used as a mean (falsely accusing and executing an innocent homeless) to an achieve an end (prevent the riot of an angry crowd demanding justice).
In a Kantian's view, if I want to make others happy, I should only act in ways that foster others’ benefits instead of simply manipulate them. This view, in a sense, resonates well with Mill’s aggregate happiness principle, as it states that we take on actions that only promote the greatest happiness for ourselves as well as others’. The paradox here is that the happiness of the whole is often not measured at the same level as the happiness of the individual. In light of this paradox, it cannot be said that the conviction and killing of an innocent life promotes that same individual’s happiness. An opposing view would say that unless the innocent individual desires death, then the Kantian would be seen as simply granting the individual’s request and achieving a greater end at the same time.

Find Another Essay On Moral Actions by Philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill

Immanuel Kant and the Moral Law

971 words - 4 pages Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century, widely known for his various achievements and works such as Critique of Pure Reason and Foundations of Metaphysics of Morals. Kant developed a theory of ethics that depends on reason rather than emotion called The Moral Law. Kant was not anti-religious but he wanted an ethical system that was not obscured by religion, emotion or personal interpretation. According to Kant, morality is

John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism Essay

1586 words - 7 pages A major problem in society John Stuart Mill highlights is that there is not a set standard for judging what makes something right or wrong. Clearing these principles is one of the fundamental steps for consensus on moral thinking. Mill believes that what makes something right or wrong is based on whether it is thought of as “good”. However, this only further raises the question on what is considered good. Mill purposes the goodness as a

Philosophers Nagel and Kant on Moral Luck

1554 words - 7 pages How can we determine what actions, if any, we're morally responsible for? At first the concept of the control principle was in practice until people came to realize that they didn’t actually practice this to the fullest degree; this lead to the creation of the idea of Moral Luck. Two philosophers with opposing viewpoints on the concept of Moral Luck were Nagel and Kant. I believe Kant has a good base for what he believes, but I don’t think

John Stuart Mill

1827 words - 7 pages Who is John Stuart Mill? John Stuart Mill was born on May 20, 1806, in London, England. He was mostly known for his radical views. For example, he preached sexual equality, divorce, universal suffrage, free speech, and proportional representation. He had many works of writings such as Principles of Political Economy, On Liberty, The Subjections of Women, and the Three Essays of Religion: Nature, the Utility of Religion, and Theism.  &nbsp

John Stuart Mill - Life and Economics

571 words - 2 pages most elastic in its demand for goods. By this, John Stuart Mill was talking about the ratio of percent change in one country to another – the percent change being the increase or decrease in value of a good (in a percentage). The last two parts of this book were; the influence of the progress on society on production and distribution2 – that is, the way the development of a country affects its production and distribution – and, the

Ethics: Ayn Rand and John Stuart Mill

1367 words - 6 pages Ethics is defined as the study of moral standards and how they affect conduct in a society or individual. With such a definition it is not wonder that the idea of what is ethically right or wrong can be interpreted differently depending on whose moral compass you use. Though there are many scholars to choose from I chose two very specific doctrines to evaluate for the purpose of this class. Ayn Rand and John Stuart Mill are two scholarly writers

Comparing Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill

4526 words - 18 pages originally issued in several languages, including an English version. According to Mark, the modern age is a dangerous age, an age in which we might be alienated from that individual independence in work and in mind which defines our humanity. Confronted by this crisis, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill offer the world diverging solutions: annihilate the existing world and march toward communism, or guard against the dangers of the existing world

John Stuart Mill: Representation's importance and pitfalls

1238 words - 5 pages function, local or general" (Chapter 3). For Mill, representation is essential to good government because is passes the "test" of good government; it has a high level of order and progress. For Mill, representation "promotes the good management of the affairs of society by means of the existing faculties, moral, intellectual, and active, of its various members" [order], and improves "those faculties" [progress] (Chapter 3).Representation, for Mill

John Stuart Mill Biographical Information

1400 words - 6 pages a few months, Mill’s depression went away, and his old beliefs had stayed for the most part. He thought that his father had “emotionally stunted” him. He came up with a new philosophy; one that would “overcome the limits imposed by culture and history, on any possible reform movement and would advance the roles of feeling and imagination.” (John Mill, 1) John Stuart Mill began to look at the positive parts of his father’s philosophies, and

Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2042 words - 8 pages moral life. In order to preserve voice, participation, and the morality of their society, Rousseau’s citizens would have no problem giving up some of the liberties that John Locke views as essential. All three philosophers have left an indelible mark on the concept of freedom in political societies. John Locke favors greater freedom for man in political society than Mill does. Rousseau favors more political freedom that personal freedom. Locke’s

On Liberty - John Stuart Mill

1126 words - 5 pages John Stuart Mill was a great philosopher of the nineteenth century and the author of 'On Liberty.' In this writing (written in 1850), Mills voiced his ideas on individual freedom, both social and political. His intended audience is educated, healthy and 'civilized' adults. He equates our personal freedoms with the pursuit of happiness, in particular, freedom of speech and expression. Mill defines the meaning of liberty as the relationship

Similar Essays

Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, And Aristotle:Morals And Ethical Codes

1160 words - 5 pages What is the appropriate action? It is a controversial question that is a focal point for moral and ethical codes. Morals and ethics is, of course, a subject that runs deep in the discussion of philosophy. People are faced with moral dilemmas everyday, which many times society decides without thoroughly exploring their options. Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle are philosophers that focus on the topic of ethics, yet all have

Utilitarianism, By John Stuart Mill Essay

2492 words - 10 pages principle of morality is and why it is so special. He explains that this “utility” concept is what he believes is the moral foundation and it is so central to our existence as human beings because it allows for achievement of happiness of people. Works Cited • Mill, John Stuart, and George Sher. Utilitarianism. 2nd ed. London: Hackett Publishing , 1895. Print. • Kant, Immanuel, and James W. Ellington. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals

Utilitarianism, By John Stuart Mill Essay

1368 words - 5 pages Explain why Mill distinguishes between higher and lower pleasures and assess whether he achieves his aim or not. In his essay, Utilitarianism Mill elaborates on Utilitarianism as a moral theory and responds to misconceptions about it. Utilitarianism, in Mill’s words, is the view that »actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.«1 In that way, Utilitarianism offers

The Moral Philosophy Of John Stuart Mill

1124 words - 4 pages inconsequential to Mill whether or not a person who performs a right action is motivated by the moral standard in judging said action's morality.John Stuart Mill, in his search for the true basis of morality, expounds what is viewed by many to be the most compelling and intuitive moral theory in existence. Its widespread popularity and acceptance is due in no small part to its solid base, the self-evident first principle of the intrinsic goodness of pleasure. This statement is the foundation of Mill's further philosophical thinking, and has a profound effect on his moral outlook as a whole.