This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Moral Obligations And Duties Essay

1881 words - 8 pages

In the Macalester student handbook, it is clear that there are consequences for cheating. For those who have witnessed or are aware of cheating incidents, policy states they are expected to report these actions, and witnesses to these events are strongly encouraged to report them. fails to report the incident. However, are students obligated to report cheating? Or is a duty of students to report this bad conduct? To answer these questions, I will first discuss how moral obligations and duties are defined. Next, I will compare them and discuss their differences. Finally, I will apply the examination of differences to determine whether it is a moral obligation or a duty to report ...view middle of the document...

Now that moral obligations and duties have been defined, it is important to identify the distinctions between them in order to properly determine if it is a moral obligation or a duty to report cheating.

DIFFERENCES

R. B. Brandt differentiates duties and moral obligations in his article The Concepts of Obligation and Duty. He separates moral obligations and duties using grammar, analyzing moral and nonmoral uses, and their paradigm uses. Brandt writes that duty does not allude to ability, which insinuates that duties are not dictated by one’s ability to complete them. One’s ability to complete or fail to complete an action does not determine whether an action is right or wrong. This focus on the doing the right thing shows that duty is not requirement but means to fulfill and do good. Obligation indicate that one “has” to do something, implying that an action is required, regardless of the abilities of the individual for whom the action is obligated. This lack of focus on doing the right thing emphasizes that it more important to do what you are supposed to do, ignoring one’s ability to meet the requirement and highlighting that there is a requirement that needs to be met.

From a grammatical standpoint, Brandt makes another distinction saying, “We ‘do’ or ‘perform’ our duties not our obligations. . .we seem to ‘meet’ obligations. An obligation thus sounds a bit like a payment due on a debt, which we are able to meet; whereas our duty is more like a job or chore which we can do or perform” (Brandt 378). Brandt’s points out that the way in which obligation is used suggests a connotation of responsibility to complete an action. This responsibility could be extended into a expectation. One is not only responsible, but expected to pay back the debt. This expectation indicates that it is a requirement to pay back the debt. The same applies to moral obligations. Because individuals are expected to meet their obligations, these obligations are requirements. Failure act responsibility or meet expectations an obligated can lead to punishment or consequences. In contrast, duties are more optional. Duties motivate people to do the right thing, regardless of whether they are required or not.. For example, many individuals recycle not because the have to, but because it is the right thing to do. Failure to meet a duty doesn’t mean punishment. Someone can not be punished for not recycling.

Brandt shifts from a grammatical analysis to an examination of the paradigm uses. He writes, “ . . . what one is obligated to do is always to achieve some positive goal. One’s obligation always concerns a state of affairs to be reached . . . It is a prescribed end” (Brandt 390.) Brandt provides an example of paying back debt. Paying back debt is an obligation because there is motivation to rid oneself from the loan and there is also a determined end. Duties have no end and do not inspire motivation to reach and end. A soldier’s claim of the duty to his country has...

Find Another Essay On Moral Obligations and Duties

When is it ever morally permissible to kill and eat animals?

1196 words - 5 pages to overcome a situation where our moral obligations have to be overridden making it morally permissible to kill and sometimes eat animals. Epictetus’ stoic philosophy argues that Providence gives nonhuman animals to rational human animals (to do what they wish) making it morally permissible for human beings to kill and eat animals in accordance with nature. The Rights View: In accordance with the “rights view” moral theory, since human

Morality and Law Essay

2474 words - 10 pages major facet of the already mentioned ideas of the maxims laid down by Immanuel Kant. Through these categorical imperatives we see that Immanuel Kant brings in the idea of the manner through which we should act and the duties and obligations that we as people have towards society. Through this idea of instilling duty and obligations on people and paving a way for people to act, it instills an idea of people having rights. As the moral theory of

Children, Debts, Obligations, and Sommers

1084 words - 4 pages children hold certain obligations towards their parents. In the beginning of her essay she states, "In what follows I shall be arguing for a strong notion of filial obligation, and more generally I shall be making a case for the special moral obligation" (Sommers 739). She then gives three examples, in which, the parents or parental figure have grown old and are neglected by the children. Much like the hypothetical situation explained in the

Political Communities and Cosmopolitanism

1904 words - 8 pages The intention of this essay is to put forth the idea of which membership in a political community does encompass prioritised moral obligations to its members. This essay will begin in the first section by exploring into the concept of political communities and the obligations which are attached to such an association. The second section will present the argument of which anti-cosmopolitans or communitarians believe that such prioritisation

Bioethics Paper

988 words - 4 pages neglects human rights and binding duties while downplaying the relevance of the person's motive, whereas Kant’s theory of duty, bases all rightness on duty and makes rights inviolable. Kant distinguishes between hypothetical and categorical imperatives, calling only the latter moral commands. 1. An imperative is any claim about what we should do. 2. Hypothetical imperatives tell what we ought to do in order to reach some desired end. 3. "You should

Democracy and Political Obligation

4040 words - 16 pages The public life of political servants is characterized by other duties and obligations than private life. Conflicts can even arise between a person's public and private duties. The central point of this paper is to examine whether this difference of duties can be regarded as an effect of different forms of obligation. Can we speak of a particular form of political obligation in the same way in which Kant distinguishes between ethical and legal

Society in relation to Stakeholder Theory

1170 words - 5 pages , Powers, and Gunnemann 61).Functional duties are normal activities of a business dictated by a moral minimum, where the survival is imperative. Negative injunctions and affirmative duties are distinguished as not inflicting harm and supererogatory actions respectively. Simon et al argues that it is hard for society to impose legitimate affirmative duties on corporations with regards to the welfare of society. Instead it is easier to impose

Logic and Moral Dilemmas

3487 words - 14 pages the moral rules. For example E.J.Lemmon [5,6] thought in that way. He distinguished such sources of our knowledge of what we are to do as duties, obligations, and moral principles. He claims that a man ought to do something, if it is his duty to do that thing. Likewise, a man ought to do it if he is under an obligation to do it. And also he ought to do it if it is right, in view of some moral principle to which he subscribes, that he should to do

Human Rights in the Age of Discovery

784 words - 3 pages opposition was moved to come out against the Spanish monarchy upon arriving at that conclusion. Trujillo makes a point that, to have the moral duties of a human being, one must have the ability of enjoying their human rights. He also says that "morality requires humanity, and humanity depends of the recognition and observance of dignity... (which) is achieved not only through our duties and obligations to others, but also through the obligations

The Intentions and Consequences of an Action

1336 words - 6 pages of moral duties: perfect and imperfect (Kant, G.M.M. Sec. 2, p. 30). In addition to these two types of duties, Kant separates them into four different categories: perfect duties in regards to the self, perfect duties toward others, imperfect duties of the self and imperfect duties that deal with others (Kant, G.M.M. Sec. 2, p. 30-31). For example, the perfect duties are generally more concerned with choosing not to act in ways that do not

Obligation is an Obnagation

817 words - 4 pages Obligations are duties—a commitment one has which is morally or legally bound—these obligations are usually towards their family, work, and future. Every person makes his or her own choice whether the choice is right or wrong. Morally everyone should fulfill his or her obligations in order to proceed in life. In the article “ I Don’t Know How to Love You” by Alysia Abbott and the short story “Girl” by Jamaica Kincaid are both about a mothers who

Similar Essays

Moral And Ethical Obligations To Animals

2304 words - 9 pages having issues comprehending what the NHRP is actually trying to achieve (Nonhumanrightsproject.org, 2014). At this point in time, the potential bodily rights of these nonhuman persons is hanging in the balance of the courts. To ensure we as a race are fulfilling our moral and ethical obligations we must minimise the suffering of any living being. Amending the guidelines and codes of practices to be a globally recognised set of strict regulations is

What Moral And Ethical Obligations Do Humans Have To Animals

1887 words - 8 pages conditions in which the animals live are cruel and abhorrent. This notion of cruelty invites debate surrounding the complex and multi-faceted issue of the moral and ethical obligations humans have in respect to other animals. The issue of battery hen farming is further confounded by economic, social, political, and food security issues. For these reasons the issue warrants further investigation. The main focus of the essay is to explore the moral

The Moral And Legal Obligations Of Battlefield Neutrality

1968 words - 8 pages The Moral and Legal Obligations of Battlefield Neutrality “If a body of enemy troops is repulsed, give to the wounded the same care as you would give your own men; treat them all the forbearance due to the one who is stricken…After the battle, restrain the fury of your troops; spare the vanquished…People should say of you: they fought courageously when they had to, but remained generous and humane throughout.” –General Guillaume Henri Dufour

Objections To Rossian Pluralism Make It A More Valuable Moral Theory

1413 words - 6 pages trade-offs. However, I will demonstrate that the problem of trade-offs is an issue that can be neglected as a valid objection to Rossian Pluralism because it is applicable to other theories as well and it is a factor that makes a moral theory more valuable than not. The prima facie duties that William David Ross has listed include duties of fidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, and non-maleficence. Duties of