This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Philosophies Of Augustine, Descartes, Arendt On Morality

1648 words - 7 pages

Philosophical musings on the nature of morality are often expressed by thinkers who focus on human nature. Among the factors which determine human behaviour, a moral analysis of the concepts of right and wrong is often prominent. In investigating human behaviour through the relationship between reflection and action, this morality is often observed. Therefore, in the course currently entitled Human Sciences 101: Reflection and Action, both phiolosophy and morality are key themes. However, the calendar description for the course is as follows, “What is the relationship between thinking and action? Do they pull us in different directions? Can they be integrated? This course investigates how our own dialogue with core texts, from antiquity (e.g., Homer, Plato, Christian Scriptures) to the present (e.g., Joyce, Arendt), offers ways of understanding the dilemmas and issues raised by these texts and present in our culture” (Waterloo 2013). The description lacks a mention of the philosophical concepts of morality within the course's content. One of the core texts of the course where morality can be seen is Saint Augustine's Confessions, where Augustine explores a theological philosophy. The theme of morality is also seen in René Descartes' Discourse on Method and Related Writings, where Descartes proposes a scientific moral philosophy. Hannah Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem also explores morality through a philosophical examination of the relationship between thinking and committing evil. Therefore, the writings of Augustine, Descartes and Arendt each exhibit a philosophical perspective on morality which can be tied to the course's central theme of reflection and action. [END OF INTRODUCTION]
[AUGUSTINE START] In Confessions, Saint Augustine articulates a theological philosophy of morality by contemplating the natures of good and evil in relation to God. However, before Augustine could explore concepts relating to God, he attempts to grasp an understanding of God as a being. This proves to be problematic since he could only picture God as “some kind of bodily substance” (Augustine 1961, 133), rather than a spiritual, incorporeal substance. At the same time, Augustine struggles with comprehending the nature of evil. He “was told that we do evil because we choose to do so of our own free will, and suffer it because [God's] justice rightly demands that we should” (Augustine 1961, 136). However, this answer to the origin of evil only raises a new question: Why would God's omnipotence permit humans to choose evil over Him? Augustine describes how he once “thought of spiritual things, too, as material bodies, each in its allotted place” (1961, 138). In thinking that everything is comprised of tangible matter, while believing that God created all matter, Augustine could find no answer to the question of why God would create evil matter at all.
Augustine's philosophy of morality begins forming after he reads the Platonists' books, which “remind [him] to...

Find Another Essay On Philosophies of Augustine, Descartes, Arendt on Morality


1803 words - 7 pages , i.e., monarchy and aristocracy. They disregarded democracy as the source of all that’s evil. They believed in the rule of one leader with supreme virtue. Both Plato and Aristotle placed grave importance on the significance of education in shaping an individual. Education, to them, was the moral and ethical development of an individual. Morality and its development was the prime concern of the state. They considered education to be a noble and

Descartes' Views on the Topic of Philosophy of Mind

1134 words - 5 pages Descartes' Views on the Topic of Philosophy of Mind Descartes has indeeed made some notable contributions towards the philosophy of mind. It is the aim of this essay to discuss these contributions. Descartes is well known for being an avid dualist. This is the view that the mind and body are understood to be seperate and distinct from each other, but in some way causally connected. Descartes was no exception and

Analysis of Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

1559 words - 6 pages Rene Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes set the groundwork for seventeenth century rationalism, the view opposed by the empiricist school of thought. As a rationalist, Descartes firmly believed in reason as the principal source of knowledge. He favoured deduction and intellect over the senses and because of this he did not find comfort in believing that his opinions, which he had developed in his youth, were credible. It

A summary of "Discourse on the Method" by Rene Descartes

758 words - 3 pages Discourse on the Method is Descartes' attempt to explain his method of reasoning through even the most difficult of problems. He illustrates the development of this method through brief autobiographical sketches interspersed with philosophical arguments. Part 1 contains "various considerations concerning the sciences." First, all people possess "good sense," the ability to distinguish truth from fiction. Therefore, it is not a lack of ability

Addressing the Problem of Evil in On Free Choice of the Will by Augustine

2268 words - 10 pages In “On Free Choice of the Will”, Augustine indicates the importance of his beliefs and opinions of human nature and of God. He thinks as greatly of God as possible and centralizes his thoughts of goodness with the concept of being/form (God); he also gives a description of how God’s rightness can be interpreted clearly through the evil doings of the world. One of the biggest and most difficult problems facing people is the problem

an essay with personal opinions on hume and descartes on the theory of ideas

613 words - 2 pages David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers with opposing views about the origination of ideas. Descartes believed there were three types of ideas which are, innate, adventitious and those from imagination. He stated since he exists and his idea of what a perfect being is, such as God, then God exists. Hume, on the other had, believed ideas came only from one thing, impressions. Both theories have their strengths and weaknesses but I like

The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy

1488 words - 6 pages The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy In order to embark on his quest for truth, Descartes first devises his four rules which should serve as a solid foundation for all else that he comes to understand. Those rules are here evaluated in terms of what they fail to take into consideration. The rules are examined individually and consecutively, and are therefore also reiterated in order to be

Criticism on the morality of "Romeo and Juliet"

1776 words - 7 pages A CRITICISM ON THE MORALITY OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE'SROMEO AND JULIETDoes Romeo and Juliet need an introduction? Of all Shakespeare's plays, it has been the most continuously popular since its first performance in the mid-1590's. It would seem, then, the most direct of Shakespeare's plays in its emotional impact. In this paper, the researcher examines the play Romeo and Juliet, its contents, characters, setting and theme being criticized.During

Descartes: The Father of Modern Philosophy on the Existence of God

1137 words - 5 pages Descartes' book Meditations is a work in which he attempts to achieve absolute certainty about three issues: the soul as "a thinking thing" distinct from or without a body, the belief that God exists, and the belief that the external world exists. I am interested in the impact that these ideas have on the question of a rational belief in God.Initially after reading portions of Descartes work, I am led to believe that thinkers build on what

What are the consequences of Nietzsche's discussion of religion on his understanding of morality?

831 words - 3 pages different perspective sheds some light on a particular view. Because of this, Nietzsche sees the world as fluid rather than fixed, but the words that we use to describe it cannot be fluid. This gives the false impression that the world we are describing with these words is also fixed, and it is from this that we have gained our conception of absolutes such as truth, morality and God. However, Nietzsche sees these as false convictions since the world

An analysis essay on the philosophical differences of Descartes and Locke - Santa Clara University - Phil 17 - essay

1213 words - 5 pages an idea or question of morality was innate, everyone would be able to understand it without having someone else explain it to them; as it is an idea (such as Descartes’ innate idea of God) that they would have no singular reason to question or doubt, as they are simply born with it. Earlier in his book, Locke discredits innate ideas on the basis that if such ideas were possible, that everyone would have access to them, whether they are children

Similar Essays

Comparsion Of John Stewary Mill And Emanuel Kants Philosophies On Morality

2288 words - 10 pages Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, Utilitarianism that is seemingly contradictory with the thoughts of

Reflections On Philosophies Of Education Essay

1761 words - 8 pages , in theory, the "might is right" government but in practice the predatory society had the momentum of history and economic motivation on its side.Rene Descartes (1596-1650) French mathematician and philosopher, and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) English statesman and philosopher, shared the mission of applying the power of knowledge to improving the human condition. Descartes and Bacon felt that the material then presented by the educational system

An Overview Of The Philosophies Of Hume, Kant, Aristotle, Augustine, And Epictetus

1160 words - 5 pages . If one does not accept of this agreement or disagreement, then it is neither true nor false and can never be an object of reason. In addition, Hume says morality is irrational. He adds that morality is under the practical division and influences one’s passions and actions. An example of this is when people are governed by their duties and impelled by others to obey their commands. Also morality is not derived from experience. For

Basic Explanation On Ordinary Mortality Touches Lord Of The Flies. Compare How Hobbes And Augustine Think The Condition Of War Arises And Defend One Author’s Account Of 'ordinary' Morality As An Ant

857 words - 3 pages functioning comes from the four internal virtues (courage, justice, temperance, and prudence) that we must exercise to achieve good human morality. Human morality, by and of its self, will not allow us humans to travel to our moral destination. It is only an exercise of the four virtues so that we as humans can achieve some sort of peace on our own through God's saving grace.To Augustine, humans seek an object of love they can't lose. The problem