This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Morality And Power Essay

938 words - 4 pages

     Thucydides’ written history of the Mytilenian Debate and the Melian Dialogue reflects the reality of a period where morality is dependent on the exercise of power and those who possess it. The main theme running through the course of these two debates is that those with the power to act as they wish inherently have the power to dictate morality. The arguments that decide the fate of the Mytilene are made not strictly on the basis of morality but on how their power allows them to exercise the moral course they choose. The Melian dialogue reveals how those in power can dictate morality in terms of self-interest. Both cases also demonstrate how morality is also a function of self-interest. The question of the relationship between power and morality also hinges on the definition of these two vague terms.
     Morality, in the broader sense of moral order, has been defined as “a set of rules which define what is right and wrong.” (Outka and Reeder, p.5) Who decides what is right and wrong often depends, as with Thucydides’ history, on who has the power in a given situation. Power can broadly be defined, as the capacity to achieve what one wants. (Dickerson and Flanagan, p.24) In the case of these two debates, the Athenians were the party who possessed the power. They had the coercive ability to decide the fates of both the Melians and the Mytilenians. This power was derived strictly from the military might their empire was able to build up. In both cases, power allowed them to dictate morality to the inferior parties.
     Thucydides’ history of the Mytilenian debate details the discussion of a council deciding on how to punish the citizens of Mytilene for a failed revolt. The two options on the table are to either slaughter all the inhabitants, as had been previously agreed upon, or to leave them without severe punishment. Cleon, the Athenian responsible of initially deciding to slaughter Mytilene, argued that it was necessary to take his brutal course of action for the safety of the empire. He stated succinctly that “leadership depends on superior strength and not on goodwill.” (Thucydides, p.213) He believed that killing the Mytilenians was a question of safety for the empire;
If you are going to give the same punishment to those who are forced to revolt by your enemies and those who do so of their own accord, can you not see that they will all revolt upon the slightest pretext, when success means freedom and failure brings no very dreadful consequences. (Thucydides, p.216)

In this statement, Cleon argues that Athens has a moral duty to put down this revolt in the harshest way. He makes it a moral argument because it is in the self-interest of Athens, and any state, to protect its citizens. It is their moral duty. The Mytilenians, in their own...

Find Another Essay On Morality And Power

Thrasymachus' Perspective on Human Nature Essay

1340 words - 5 pages Thrasymachus' Perspective on Human Nature Thrasymachus' perspective of human nature is that we all seek to maximize power, profit and possessions. He gives the argument that morality is not an objective truth but rather a creation of the stronger (ruling) party to serve its own advantage. Therefore definitions of "just" and "unjust", "right" and "wrong", "moral" and "immoral" are all dependent upon the decree of the ruling party

Plato Essay

1643 words - 7 pages intrinsically valuable and when morality is compared to immorality. First, let’s take a closer look at morality. Morality is simply the politics of the passions, and it is often classed as a respect for manners and customs. Morality is that action which is acceptable to others, and mainly the majority. Many have said morality is our prejudices learned, as we grow older. Power often controls our morality. Yet, moral happiness should be the road all would

What are the consequences of Nietzsche's discussion of religion on his understanding of morality?

831 words - 3 pages who have no power in this life will believe, because of religion, that they will have power in another life. We have invented religion as a way of explaining our sense of being defeated in life. Nietzsche here has explained and accounted for how religion has created this false order and it is clear to see that he has other ideas of what morality is without reference to Christianity.Within "Beyond Good and Evil" and his other works, Nietzsche

Is Christianity a Slave Morality?

1221 words - 5 pages favored being timid, turning the other cheek to violence, and held resentment towards the master without showing anger but holding internally. The master morality favored strength, will to power, and looked the enemy dead in the eyes and declared their anger. Christianity came after Judaism. Jesus was a Jew. The Jews were slaves in Egypt thanks to Joseph and were freed from slavery with the help of Moses. I think it would be safe to say Christianity

Nietzsche: Human, All Too Human

1165 words - 5 pages power, a realization of one being noble, and a superior status. According to Nietzsche, masters are considered to be unrestrained, audacious, open, and lacking in self-doubt. These men were considered the movers and shakers and who were exulting in the exercises of power and authority and society was deem these men of whatsoever they desired. On the other hand, the slave morality is a morality of excuses. The men who posses this morality are have a

Is human society a fundamentally amoral, dog-eat-dog? If so, then Macbeth is right, and human life itself is meaningless and tiresome?

661 words - 3 pages badly as he is. Macbeth's fictional world isn't a dog eat world though it is from Macbeth's point of view; but his world is a biased alteration of the real world as morality always prevailing was a theme of the play."Morality is as you find it" R. BurretteThe main reason for Macbeth's downfall was that he wasn't strong enough to prevent himself being corrupted by his own power. Like in reality once an individual has tasted power and given an

Democratic Morality

1302 words - 5 pages status humble those who are excluded. One may find exceptions to the rule in benevolent leadership for limited periods, but there is no basis in experience for a belief that those that are ruled can ensure their personal realization without direct or indirect participation in the power itself. Democratic morality will only become meaningful if it becomes part of the norms and the dominant spirit of a society. There must be acceptance of the

nietzche and hegel

956 words - 4 pages Nietzsche's master-slave morality describes the way in which moral norms shifted through the through eras, from pre-scocratic times to the modern age founded upon Christian and Jewish beliefs. During pre-socratic times, value was dominated and enacted by the master class, who saw themselves and what they did as good. Value was defined along their terms of good- what was good for the master class was itself good. This notion of value was designed

English Psychologist A

1262 words - 5 pages , than by ascertaining, on any side, the true interests of mankind." (Hume pg. 19) According to Hume's philosophy, morals are defined by their utility. For an action to be defined moral, it must serve some social utility that aids human flourishing. Nietzsche, on the contrary, offers a very different account of morality centralized on power and influence.Nietzsche claims morals have been defined throughout history by those considered the powerful

Origins of Morality

1608 words - 6 pages spiritual revenge, together with the priests who are also overpowered by the warrior caste. From this hatred and ressentiment, they start a slave revolt in morality with the emergence of a new philosophy that makes the poor, oppressed, and persecuted “good”, consequently, making those with power who had excessive lavish lifestyles “evil”. They said “let us be different from the evil, namely good! And he is good who does not outrage, who harms

The State of Man: An Analysis of the Inherently Good Nature of Man

1171 words - 5 pages Good and evil are two of the most ambiguous terms in the English language. There are definite themes of good and evil throughout Harper Lee’s “To Kill A Mockingbird”. Most define good as “morally righteous” and evil as “morally wrong or immoral”. These two definitions raise an important question. What is morality? Philosophically, morality can be described as a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all

Similar Essays

Power, Morality, And Terror Essay

1520 words - 6 pages Power, Morality, and Terror In the wake of events stemming from the bombing of the World Trade Center, citizens of the United States have slowly been coming to grips with many changes- new threats, new fears, and a new vision of the world and our place within it. As we re-adjust the lens through which we see our geopolitical landscape and begin to formulate a national security policy which can effectively respond to the terrorist threat, we

Morality Play, And The Abuse Of Power

1195 words - 5 pages The Abuse of Power in the book Morality Play Many centuries ago, the wise King Arthur once stated," Might does not make right." A thoughtful and compelling comment that serves humanity as a reminder that having power does not justify its abuse. However, even with this warning to future leaders, the abuse of power has been running rampant throughout history. Barry Unsworth's book Morality Play focuses on England in the late

An Analysis Of Joseph Nye’s Use Of “Soft Power” And Its Relationship With Morality In International Relations

3025 words - 12 pages An Analysis of Joseph Nye’s Use of “Soft Power” and its Relationship with Morality in International Relations Recently, the United States has lost a great deal of power in the international arena because of its invasion of Iraq and torture of prisoners of war. The United States holds an incredible edge in military capabilities over any other nation and the US benefits from the largest economy in the world. In a world where there is one

Morality And Religion Debate Essay

1152 words - 5 pages Holocaust. Dershowitz believes that there is a difference between morality and religion. When people are moral without religion, they are being virtuous on their own, not because they are afraid of God. He stated that religion should not consist of a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate, stated that religion sets the standard for what's moral. Keyes argued "power only ultimately respects another power