Morality Is Universal Essay

1628 words - 7 pages

Morality is Universal

Throughout history, humankind has looked back to the past, to seek the truth about morals, religion, and how they both impact and define civilization. Stories and myths from ancient Greece show overbearing resemblance to our own Bible as both shun the many temptations of our soul either by teaching the value of a characteristic or warning of the "ill fruits reaped". Dante Alighieri revealed in his Divine Comedy that "Pride, Envy, and Avarice are the three sparks, [the three universal deadly sins] that have set these hearts on fire" (Bartlett 80). This statement is quite true for these three enticements have existed evidently in belief systems and moral codes since the creation of fire. One of the most obvious portrayals of avarice or greed in Greek mythology is the tragic story of King Midas and his golden touch (Coolidge 90). Midas longed to be the wealthiest man in the world and asked the most foolish request of Dionysus -- to have the golden touch. Too late Midas realized his folly, for as he dined. The food and ale in his mouth quickly turned to hard metal. Midas shocked at the fate he had bestowed upon himself left the great hall in search of Dionysus, the god of festival, but came across his daughter. Unfortunately before heeding his warning, she gave her father a loving embrace and immediately turned to the yellowish element (MacPherson 49-50). Midas survived but paid the eternal price. Through this toil, he learned that no matter how precious gold is, once down to bare essentials it can not buy back love or life lost or even sustain life. The Christian Bible incorporates this myth’s moral interpretation as well. One of the most notorious events that teaches Christians of today the dangers and repercussions of greed is the story of Jacob and Esau. Because of the birth order, Esau was entitled to the inheritance in its entirety, leaving Jacob, once his father died, virtually destitute. Defying his brother, father, and family for the sake of avarice, Jacob used trickery to deceive his father and steal the inheritance (Genesis 25:13). In this instance, Jacob’s theft and departure results in a family torn to pieces. This lesson of greed turned disaster is a valued one that today’s society must incorporate in order to reach a higher level of being. Unfortunately, pleasant epithets such as "acquisitiveness" and "determined" that are viewed in the business world as favorable mask this foul character trait in our present culture. Today, there are no gods and goddesses to openly and immediately prosecute the cupidity and so this character trait spreads like wild fire from one cut-throat to the next. Instead, the greedy realize their blunder only at death when they fall from the glorious gates of Heaven to fiery depths of Hell, where they can covet only fire from their neighbor. Mythological and biblical text most often target arrogance of all moral lessons. The Bible clearly warns, "Pride goes before destruction, and a...

Find Another Essay On Morality is Universal

Title of Paper

992 words - 4 pages development, in 1958, American developmental psychologists Lawrence Kohlberg published a dissertation which revolutionized the field of moral development. Kohlberg’s work posited a Platonic model of morality that believed that morality is universal, and humans all innately subscribe to a universal moral ideal: this ideal he referred to as justice. Speaking against the “bag of virtues” perspective of morality, in his first volume of the Philosophy

differences between absolute and relative morality

1031 words - 4 pages Explain the differences between absolute and relative moralityAbsolute morality means any theory in which the rules are absolute: they are unchanging and universal and come in a variety of forms. Relative morality means any theory in which something is judged in relation to something else and is therefore open to change.Absolute laws or rules of morality will never change. More or less meaning they are objective. Objective means that I am not

Categorical Imperative vs. Utilitarianism

1410 words - 6 pages Kant: the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical ImperativeKantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of theCategorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions.This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim andconsiders whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rationalbeings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would will it tobe a universal law. Once it is clear that the

All's Fair In Love And War

2172 words - 9 pages a superior and legitimate authoritative body can impose a moral system upon all nations, realists strongly rely upon the fact that the world consists of a diverse and multicultural population. Realists posit that currently no universal moral code exists as people differ in their moral views both along and within national and cultural borders. Political Realists recognize that morality is notions of what is right or wrong. They also adhere to the

Ethical Relativism and Cultural Relativism

797 words - 3 pages In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in

Shafer-Landau and Korsgaard

1616 words - 7 pages desires for positive virtues are able to uphold morality without it being recognised as a set of categorical imperatives. One issue with Foots argument can be found in his assertion of Moral virtues. He claims that moral guidelines are not universal but lists of moral virtues that seem to be portrayed as timeless and universal. If this is true then one could argue that they demonstrate a very open type of categorical imperative that Foot tries to

Democratic Morality

1302 words - 5 pages on all matters where social action is substituted for individual action, liberty exists only through participation either in decision making or in control of leaders who make the decisions. Therefore, Redford refers to the third component of democratic morality as universal participation (Redford, 1969, p. 6). The first two ideas of democratic morality constitute its ultimate purpose: the freedom and opportunity of all men for


755 words - 3 pages invalid becasuse premis number one, which states that "different cultures have radically different moral codes" is wrong because the differences are not radical, and there are universal truths. One could point out that all societies have an inate tendency to care for their young and other young in general, or that murder is not accepted in any culture. One could also argue that using the prusit of truth as an example will show that morality is not

Fair Playing Field

879 words - 4 pages Fair playing Field This paper will refute Kant's duty oriented morality based on the fact that society is not a fair playing field for universal morality.Immanuel Kant determines the morality of an action based on universal acceptance and unconditional motivation. It is universally known that stealing is wrong because we would not want things stolen from us. Similar to the golden rule, one can judge a morality of an action based on justification

Answers and explains questions pertaining to ethics

977 words - 4 pages 2. There are a number of reasons why people should be generally moral. The main reason being is a good sense of morality will promote human flourishing and ameliorate human suffering more so than if people were not moral, or people were all strict ethical egoists. Without people acting morally the world would be an even more chaotic place, there would be no or very little regard for other humans as well as little regard for the

Philosophy Essay

981 words - 4 pages force people to act morally despite any exterior fears.It is better to base morality on personal feelings and individual situations as opposed to laws and commandments. Laws tend to be interpreted differently by different people, change over time, and can be negatively influenced by biased lawmakers whereas personal feelings are unbiased and are always relevant to the present. Additionally, it's difficult to make a universal standard due to the

Similar Essays

Is Morality Realitive Essay

615 words - 2 pages "It is obvious that morality is relative"Critically assess this claim.Some would argue that morality is relative. That certain acts cannot be deemed immoral as whether it is immoral or not depends on the circumstances of a situation, the culture and values of the people involved.Abortion is a good example of relative morality, is it right or wrong, this depends on the perspective of the person making the moral decision. Mackie argues that "there

Is Morality Realitive Essay

615 words - 2 pages "It is obvious that morality is relative"Critically assess this claim.Some would argue that morality is relative. That certain acts cannot be deemed immoral as whether it is immoral or not depends on the circumstances of a situation, the culture and values of the people involved.Abortion is a good example of relative morality, is it right or wrong, this depends on the perspective of the person making the moral decision. Mackie argues that "there

The Idea Of Morality Cannot Work Without The Existence Of God

1032 words - 4 pages The Idea of Morality Cannot Work Without the Existence of God Morality is the set of concepts about wha tis good or bad, right or wrong, in human charater or conduct. God demands that moral judgements are universal and based on religion. However, other schools of thought, e.g. the ideology of Anarchy, claim that if this 'morality made by god' is the case, then 'each person is his own god'. We must

Moral Law According To Kant Essay

553 words - 2 pages believe anyone's promises. In ethics, Kant tried to show that doing one's duty consisted in following only those principles that one would accept as applying equally to all.      Kant objects most of all to the principle that one's own happiness can be the ground of morality. He rejects this possibility because well-being is not always proportionate to virtuous behavior. By this I mean that one manÕs well being is not always universal to all