This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Morality Via Kant And Hegel Essay

1505 words - 6 pages

1. Introduction
Human beings have moral inclinations that affect our actions. Few would deny as a fact of human life a perpe-tual strive to do right and good concordant with one’s particular moral beliefs (while concomitantly judging others by them). For most, this strive is accompanied by a questioning of the very nature of the moral: Is there an impartial criterion that enables us to know objectively what one ought to do, or do our moral intuitions rest solely on subjective, arbitrary grounds? With the lure of divine command theory fading from the Enlightenment and onwards, modern moral philosophy can be seen as an attempt to uncover either the criterion or its nonexistence. An endeavor in which few can be said to have been as influential as Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and his most trenchant critic, G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831).
Kant’s deontological attempt to unearth this criterion rests on one of the most metaphysical and abstract explanations ever given for the common intuitions of morality (Scruton 2001, 73). With the metaphysical dual-ism claimed by his Transcendental Idealism as his cornerstone, Kant argued that Reason – to him a defining and immutable trait of human nature – allows for the derivation of formal and universally valid moral princip-les. His famous derivation of these, the Categorical Imperative, tantalizing promises an Archimedean point to morality: The moral standpoint from which one can always judge apodictically what is right independent of one’s vested empirical interests. Opposite the classical eudemonistic theories, Kant importantly rejected the feasibility of defining happiness in non-subjective terms, thereby denying the question of the good life its constitutive role in morality – then only a matter of “[…] justifiable normative judgments” (Habermas 1990, 196).
Hegel formulated much of his philosophy in contradistinction to Kant’s looming legacy and infamously charged that the Categorical Imperative is tantamount to Empty Formalism. As both he and Kant were purveyors of grand theories, his multifaceted argument cannot be pared down to disparate elements without simplification. Yet if so permitted, it can be presented to mainly occur on the following four deeply entangled fronts. One, Hegel objected to the ahistoricity presumed by Kant concerning human nature, freedom, and the reach of human knowledge. Kant had held that the universality of human nature was ascertainable on purely philosophical grounds, whereas Hegel believed that “[…] the very foundations of the human condition could change from one historical era to another.” (Singer 1983, 13). Two, due to the Categorical Imperative’s abstract universalism he deemed it oblivious to concrete application. Three, he questioned Kant’s account of autonomy and moral motivation qua the dichotomy that Kant posit between duty and inclinations. Four, qua the formalism of the Categorical Imperative, he found it capable only of tautological judgments.
Tied up with Hegel’s...

Find Another Essay On Morality via Kant and Hegel

Kant and Morality Essay

1706 words - 7 pages utilitarianism as an ethic, then people would internalize these ethics naturally as a moral binding. Mill argues that happiness is the root foundation of morality. Freedom from pain and having pleasure are the sole desirable things or ends (Mill 10). In any activity that a person does, he desires that the end will bring happiness. This can be compared with Aristotle’s view on happiness which terms the ends as happiness. This shows that according to Mill

The essay deals with Kant and how his view on rationailty determine's his view on morality, referring to his idea of duty

761 words - 3 pages For Kant, the best way to live is the morally good way. This is not because of morality's bestowal to happiness, but because of the intrinsic value and significance of morality.The basic principles of morality are principles of practical reason; and these basic principles of practical rationality are 'a priori': our wisdom of these principles is not based on empirical observation or experience. On the contrary, these principles are in some sense

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

696 words - 3 pages thoughts on Reality:Hegel believed that all real things in the world are ultimately one, so he is a monist (considers everything one). Hegel also stated that the study of history is "the thought that Reason rules the world." Hegel had a reoccurring idea that Reason, and Reason only rules the world.Hegel's Thoughts on Bodies :Hegel distinguishes between organic and inorganic bodies. Most of what he says agrees with Kant, however he points out that

Comparing Hegel and Kant's Views on Reason

537 words - 2 pages Comparing Hegel and Kant's Views on Reason That "the idea pays the ransom of existence and transience—not out of its own pocket, but with the passions of individuals" is an idea with categorizes what Hegel calls "the Cunning of Reason" (35). It is in this way that Hegel describes universal Reason, a force which ensures the end of history in its own self-consciousness. Like Kant, Hegel develops a teleological history which moves toward a

Eurocentrism of G. W. Hegel

1686 words - 7 pages ., From Ancient Africa to Ancient Greece, The Black Heritage Corporation, Geogia 1981.TEMPELS, P., Bantu Philosophy, trans. A. Rubbs, Presence Africane, Paris 1959.HORTON, J., West African Countries and Peoples, Edinburgh university Press, London 1969.MBITI, J. S. African Religions and Philosophy, East African Publishers, Nairobi 1969.APETORGBOR, T., conversation with Andrew Muendo, 10th October 2011.NEUGEBAUER, C., "Hegel and Kant. A Refutation of

Hegel’s Dialect: Explanations Through Thesis and Antithesis

1102 words - 5 pages Rousseau, Kant, and Spinoza. Hegel developed a theory that consisted of philosophical contradictions and tensions that interpret themselves as part of a compressive evolution of rational unity all derived between different text in which he called the absolute idea or the absolute knowledge. Hegel proclaimed that the main characteristic of this unity was that it was forever evolving through a manifestation as it contradicted itself as well as

Separating Morality from Law

1055 words - 4 pages The idea of separating morality from law is problematic. Regardless of anyone’s desire to separate the two, it is impossible. All law is moral or, as the case may be, immoral. The real question of the law is what those morals are. Immanuel Kant seemed unable to define a universal moral, which he indeed tried to define. Kant defined it in three parts. These morals he used to explain the best regime and the duties of citizens within that

Moral Law According To Kant

553 words - 2 pages . Most significantly, Kant renounces happiness as the principle of morality because it obliterates the specific difference between virtue and vices.      Universality is the form of a moral law whereby all rational beings are subject to the same condition as the basis of morality. Kant argues that there can be principles for action that do not admit of exceptions, and that this occurs through practical reason. In other words, the possibility for


958 words - 4 pages . Unlike the other forms, this form of are was not just stuck in this stage. The romantic stage could go back and take things from the other two stages, in this stage art is removed from religious practice. This stage is good and bad for art. It is good for art in the fact that now artists can be more creative and in this Hegel can agree with Kant, because they both believe art can be free from beauty, religion, and rules and structure. But it is

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

799 words - 4 pages Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Hegel was born in Stuttgart,Germany on August 27,1770.He was born as a son of government clerk whose name was George Ludwig Hegel.Hegel was the eldest of three children.He was brought up in a Protestant pietism ambience.Hegel was already studied about Latin before he began school by his mother.He was concerned about Greek roman classics,literatüre and philosophy.Christiane,his sister,and Hegel were very attached

Kant's Categorical Imperative

1218 words - 5 pages Kant?s Categorical Imperatives of the Fundamental Principle of Morality In section one of Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morality, Kant gives us five propositions that he holds to be our common understanding of morality. In the second section he outlines the Categorical Imperative of the fundamental principle of morality to show that it has a particular form and end to it. Kant uses this Categorical Imperative to show that the five examples of

Similar Essays

Kant And Hegel Essay

3093 words - 12 pages to the German philosophers the self was very indualvidualistic. This was you basic "˜I am' a single consciousness. This view was held by philosophers such a Descartes as can be clearly shown in his meditations. Kant then developed this idea to a "˜We are'. This takes the form of a communal human consciousness or a group mind. It is the difference between "˜the Human Mind' and the previous "˜My Human Mind". Later Hegel took

Analyzing The Political Thoughts Of Immanuel Kant And G.W.F. Hegel

1922 words - 8 pages Director Steve McQueen, in his 2013 film “12 Years a Slave” provides four examples of the philosophical arguments of both Immanuel Kant and G.W.F Hegel. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit argues two forms of consciousness. His categorization on the codependent relationship between lord and bondsman is complementary to Kant’s political thought on the categorical imperative. Kant argues in The Grounding of Metaphysics of Morals, that in the

Kant And Mac Intyre: What Determines Morality?

1960 words - 8 pages else then the conception of law in itself, which certainly is not only possible in a rational being, in so far as this conception, and not the expected effect, determines the will (Kant 167).There are undeniable rules of morality that dictate our actions. To be moral, these laws must be followed always, and not based on the consequences, but on the soul fact of whether or not it can be applicable to all. MacIntyre's works, on the other hand, talk

Kant And The Morality Of Anger

4129 words - 17 pages Kant and the Morality of Anger Introduction This essay does not comprise a defence of retributive punishment, neither does it imply a rejection of deterrent punishment. The writer suggests that one possible reason for the tendency to advocate punishment of offenders with ever increasing severity can be discovered in the concept of the 'morality of anger'. It is this explanation of the phenomenon that forms the principal burden of the