This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Mississippi History: Indian Removal Act, 13th Amendment, And Reverend George Lee

718 words - 3 pages

Mississippi History has become the state its now because of many events, government actions, cultural changes, and writers. Indian Act Removal Act, 13th Amendment, and Reverend George Lee played a big impact Mississippi current status. The Removals of Indians increased the Europeans power and lessened the Indian population. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery. Reverend George Lee was shot down for urging blacks to vote. All these contributed to Mississippi History.

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. The act authorized him to negotiate with the Native Americans in the Southern Non- Native Americans supported the act heavily. Christian missionaries opposed this act was future President Abraham Lincoln, future New Jersey Theodore Frelinghuysen and Congressman Davy Crockett spoke against the legislation. It later was passed by Congress. Due to the Indian Removal Act the current Native American population is very low. --The Removal Act of 1830, section I, in The American Indian and the United States, A Documentary History, ed. Wilcomb E. Washburn, vol. 3 (New York: Random House, 1973) 2169"That in the making of any such exchange or exchanges, it shall and may be lawful for the President solemnly to assure the tribe or nation with which the exchange is made, that the United States will forever secure and guaranty to them, and their heirs or successors, the country so exchanged with them and if they prefer it, that the United States will cause a patent or grant to be made and executed to them for the same: Provided always, Those lands shall revert to the United States, if the Indians become extinct, or abandon the same." (http://www.columbia.edu/~lmg21/BC3180/removal.html).

The President and his fellow republicans knew that the emancipation proclamation would be viewed as a temporary war measure and not outlaw slavery after the Civil War, so they passed a constitutional amendment to do so. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery, and was passed on January 31, 1865. It declared, "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."(http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/13thamendment.html)....

Find Another Essay On Mississippi History: Indian Removal Act, 13th Amendment, and Reverend George Lee

The Indian Removal Act Essay

762 words - 3 pages land and made to move west of the Mississippi River as other tribes had been. (Foner, 2012) Conclusion By 1840, the entire eastern coast of the United States were inhabited by whites. The Indian Removal Act had served its purpose. The white people moved further south and were more widespread than ever. They viewed the American Indians as American history, not as people that had been forced from their land by the American Government by going

Andrew Jackson and The Indian Removal Act

1591 words - 6 pages the authority to do exactly what he wanted in the first place, to get rid of the Indians, “It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with the Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi” (Indian Removal Act). If the Indians signed the treaties it mean that they traded their land east of the Mississippi for land to the west of the Mississippi and a little bit of money. The original plan was for the act to be peaceful and optional

The Indian Removal Act and Louisiana Purchase

702 words - 3 pages The Indian Removal Act and the Louisiana Purchase was a very important time in the U.S. History and many years to come. In the late 1700s and early 1800s, two major events took place that were turning points for the U.S., The Louisiana Purchase and the Indian Removal Act, these events made an impact socially, economically, and politically. First of all, The United States was out in search for rich soil to plant many fields of cotton

Native American Perspective on Indian Removal Act

958 words - 4 pages is it supposed that the wandering savage has a stronger attachment to his home than the settled, civilized Christian?”(94). Here, Andrew Jackson was brisk to call us ‘wondering savage’ and question our motives when he knew not a thing about us or our culture. Jackson was only able to see the situation from his own perspective. Jackson was not able to see the damaging consequences of the Indian removal act because of his narrow view. "You never

AP UNITED STATES HISTORY, INDIAN REMOVAL ACT, WAS IT JUSTIFIABLE TO GET SO MANY INDIANS KILLED? - US HISTORY - RESEARCH PAPER

691 words - 3 pages , Muskogee, Chickasaws, Cherokees, and the Seminoles. In the 1830, the Removal Act went into effect. The Removal Act gave President Andrew Jackson the power to remove Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi river by a negotiate removal treaties. The treaties, made the Indians give up their land for exchange of land in the west. There were a few tribes that agreed to sign the treaties. The others that did not sign the treaty were forced into

The Indian Removal Act of 1830: Corrupt from the Outset

1805 words - 8 pages popularity among voters in the growing and rural staters of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi can be attributed to his strong stance in favor of Indian Removal. When The Indian Removal Act went to Congress, the issue was highly contentious. The Senate vote was split on party lines, indicating the political nature of the bill, rather than its supposed humanitarian goals. The House vote too was split, however had many Jacksonians defecting and

The Impact of the Indian Removal Act on Eastern Native American Tribes

2289 words - 9 pages authority to move consenting eastern Native American tribes west of the Mississippi River. It has been debated whether the Indian Removal Act benefitted or harmed the welfare of Native Americans, and it can be argued that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 had an extremely negative impact on the eastern Native American tribes that relocated west of the Mississippi River. President Jackson abused the rights provided to Native Americans under the act, which

The End Of A Way of Live; the Indian Removal Act of 1830

961 words - 4 pages The defining moment when all the native American Indians were now no longer eligible to stay in their homes the act known as the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This policy was the decision of not only the new North American people but that of the seventh president Andrew Jackson. This White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) president was the last barrier standing between the Native American Lands and New Americans, who would receive land when the

Study notes for Indian removal for united states history class

689 words - 3 pages )First president to take political advantage of increasing electoral power of westerners and their desire to eliminate Indians: Indian Treaties and Removal Act of 1830(i)Offered voluntary and fair exchange of lands so Indians would not be bothered anymore(ii)Supreme Court found removal act unconstitutional(d)Invented allotment (won’t “work” until 1880s) (Zinn 128)(2)US claims “Plenary Power” over tribes(a)Cherokee Nation v

Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal 1980 DBQ

1444 words - 6 pages and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.” Andrew Jackson put in place the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This act forced Natives off their homelands and onto the lands west of the Mississippi River. They encountered a journey, called the Trail of Tears, where they traveled by foot to what would be their new homes, which transformed the lives of thousands of Native Americans. The President’s intentions were to

Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Policy of 1830

935 words - 4 pages There are many theories and sorted opinions as to why Andrew Jackson implemented the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Andrew Jackson's motives for enforcing the policy, and the actions he performed when he carried it out, can be interpreted in various ways depending on the analyzer's perspective. Robert V. Remini, for one, believes that Andrew Jackson forced the Indians out of their lands solely for humanitarian reasons. He states, "[Andrew Jackson

Similar Essays

History: The Indian Removal Act Essay

1260 words - 5 pages ” (Ellis 6). The white Americans were hungry for land and gold. They also did not like the Native Americans. They thought that they were ruthless. Because of this, they wanted the Indians to move away. Using the Indian Removal Act, President Jackson finally was able to get rid of the Native tribes. The Indian Removal was an important part of our nation’s history.   Works Cited Agnew, Brad. Fort Gibson: Terminal on the Trail of Tears. Norman

The Indian Removal Act Essay

3619 words - 14 pages peaceful assimilation could successfully be achieved among the Indians living east of the Mississippi. If the United States stuck to a more broadminded scheme or idea, the relationship toward the Native Americans and eventually other Indians that they would encounter further west, may not have been as tragic as they were.The history of the Indian Removal Act begins during Jackson's first State of the Union Address which was delivered in December of

The Indian Removal Act Essay

678 words - 3 pages relocated, many with force, and thousands died during the process. Those that benefited most from the Indian Removal Act were the State of Georgia, the Country as a whole and Indians. Georgia Twenty-five million acres of land east of the Mississippi that had been occupied by Indians became available due to the Indian Removal Act. The State of Georgia had a particularly contentious relationship with the Cherokee Indians occupying land within

The Indian Removal Act Essay

859 words - 4 pages unnecessary and shameful times in U.S. history. The Beneficiaries of the Indian Removal Act Long before becoming president, Jackson was an active supporter of Indian removal. Between 1814 and 1818, Jackson was in charge of the military forces that waged war with the Creek and Seminole Indians. Consequently, the Creek Indians lost 22 million acres in Georgia and Alabama, and the Spanish owned Florida, where the Seminole Indians lived, was back in