This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nafta Essay

2011 words - 8 pages

INTRODUCTION

The North American Free Trade Agreement was initially started with a pact between the United States and Canada in early 1989. Soon there after a pact between the United States, Canada, and Mexico combined to make up the second-largest free trade zone in the world. The largest being the European Economic Area. The pact between the United States, Canada, and Mexico called the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) started on January 1, 1994 with much opposition here in the United States. Many environmental groups, labor unions, and parts of the United States government had strong feelings both for and against the implementation of NAFTA. This will be the area of discussion for this paper. We will discuss the pros and cons of NAFTA.

EMPLOYMENT

Employment is one of the hottest debated topics of NAFTA. There are numerous documented cases of Americans losing their jobs due to the agreement. Manufacturers such as Zenith Television, JVC, and Thompson Consumer Electronics have all closed down American plants and opened new ones in Mexico since NAFTA's inception in 1994. With an estimate of over 350,000 jobs lost in the first three years alone, we can see how this is a delicate subject for those who oppose NAFTA. This along with more and more articles being published about jobs being lost due to NAFTA has led to a very negative public perception of NAFTA. What most people do not understand is that as countries engage in trade and as resources and labor shift from one industry to another some jobs disappear and others are created. For instance, the United States is a leader of importing advanced computer components for some of the world's most advanced computers made here in the USA. Importing low-tech circuit boards to produce higher-tech finished products allows companies to direct labor, capital, and other resources toward the higher-end advanced processes involved in production. Free trade therefore maximizes a company's ability to produce better products by leaving the production of minor components to countries that do not have high-end manufacturing capabilities. This division of labor has paid off in many high tech industries here in the United States. For example the US produces more technology for the worldwide Internet network and the hardware to access it than any other country. We also lead the world in accessing the Internet. The pure volume differences are amazing (Chart 1). With this said critics still claim that NAFTA is hurting both the United States and Mexico. Critics claim that the only people who benefit from NAFTA is the multinational companies operating in Mexico. These companies use the cheap labor and the relaxed laws to manufacture or produce their products at extremely low overhead and then send these same items to the United States and other areas for top shelf price. These companies do this without doing much for vast majority of poor citizens in Mexico. This takes us into our second...

Find Another Essay On NAFTA

NAFTA Essay

3660 words - 15 pages Good Essay Excellent! NAFTA The North America market is one of the richest in the world. Measured in terms of GDP, it is the equivalent of Western Europe. But with a somewhat smaller population, GDP per capita in North America, Canada, Mexico and the U.S., is around 12 percent higher than in Western Europe. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which came into effect January 1, 1994, sets out the schedule for tariff elimination for

Nafta paper

1164 words - 5 pages WHY THE PRO-NAFTA HYSTERIA? November 1993 I'm puzzled. I'd like to know why so many free-marketeers, so many free-market think-tanks and pundits, are not simply pro-Nafta, but are fervently, frantically, almost hysterically pro-Nafta. Look, I can understand, though not agree with, mild approval. An old libertarian friend of mine, for example, told me that he was mildly pro-Nafta but not really interested in the entire topic. That seems sensible

Maquiladoras & NAFTA

2053 words - 8 pages MAQUILADORAS AND THE NAFTA'S IMPACT: Introduction In this paper I will discuss the history and practices of the Maquiladora industry. I will discuss its background, its problems, the benefits it offers to United States companies, and the impact the NAFTA has and will have on the industry. In addition, I will make a suggestion on a possible strategy the Maquiladoras can adopt in order to address the challenges brought on by the NAFTA, to

Nafta Vs. Outsourcing

1218 words - 5 pages NAFTA vs Outsourcing         NAFTA is an acronym for North American Free Trade Agreement. It was started January 1, 1994. NAFTA was implemented to remove most barriers of trade in Mexico, United States, and Canada. Its goal was to help the counties grow faster economically, create more jobs, and help environmental concerns. Many people have opposing feelings on how well the NAFTA is really doing for each country. Most evidence

NAFTA: Good or Bad

841 words - 3 pages The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became effective in Canada, Mexico, and the United States on January 1, 1994. This agreement removed the tariffs and other trade barriers on goods produced and sold in North America. NAFTA was built upon a prior 1989 trade agreement between the U.S. and Canada that was responsible for tariff reductions between the nations. NAFTA forms the world's second largest free trade area. The largest free

NAFTA Vs The EU

1500 words - 6 pages [Author’s Name][Professor’s Name][Course Title][Date]NAFTA Vs The EUIntroductionThere are now numerous expectations concerning NAFTA that obviously foresee incredible beyond an effortless free trade area (FTA). Furthermore, there are systematic exercises in a comparative viewpoint with the European Union (EU) that bestow the advantage of the doubt on the thought of a North American Community. If we analyze than we come to know that the NAFTA is

NAFTA and Globalization

586 words - 2 pages providing jobs and easy access to goods, but with this help there is also the price of destroying values and exploiting workers. They attempt to Americanize these people and enforce our values upon them. With the rise of industrialization, the question of free trade has arisen. Free trade is the elimination of taxes, tariffs and quotas over international borders. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), consisting of Mexico, the USA and

NAFTA and Maquiladoras

2310 words - 9 pages NAFTA and Maquiladoras The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which became effective on January 1, 1994, is a comprehensive, rules-based agreement designed to promote “free-trade” among the United States, Mexico and Canada (NAFTA Forum,1998). Although the agreement was made between three countries, it was largely the inclusion of Mexico around which most of the oppositional debate was centered (Mayer, 1998). Canada is a modern

NAFTA Regional Integration

1405 words - 6 pages In March of 1994, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was signed by leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. This agreement is about tariffs and cooperation of trade among the three countries in creating an open environment to trade without restraint. The three countries ultimately receive many benefits and advantages from NAFTA, however, there are also disadvantages of this agreement. NAFTA continues to have a major impact on

NAFTA in Marketing

1282 words - 6 pages II. Please discuss, analyze, explain, and clarify the reasons you would sell new products to Mexico, if you were an American or a Canadian seller. Please see Chapter 9 in your textbook, especially pp. 263 – 265. How does the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) affect your decisions regarding offering the four P’s of marketing (product, place, promotion, and price) of selling new computers or automobiles in the traditionally closed

nafta vs eu

2487 words - 10 pages freely as possible. The most common trade agreements are concluded in order to reduce tariffs, quotas and other trade restrictions. Various trade agreements are classified on the basis of number and type of signatories i.e. bilateral and multi-lateral , by sophistication i.e. (EU) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) , All agreements concluded outside of the WTO framework are called preferential . These are also known as regional trade

Similar Essays

Nafta Essay

1118 words - 4 pages NAFTA         On January 1st, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect, creating the world’s largest free trade area. Among the main objectives is the liberalization of trade between Canada, Mexico and the United States, to stimulate economic growth and give the NAFTA countries equal access to each other’s markets. Some of the promised benefits were 200,000 new U.S. jobs from NAFTA per year, higher wages in

Nafta Essay

1118 words - 4 pages NAFTA         On January 1st, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect, creating the world’s largest free trade area. Among the main objectives is the liberalization of trade between Canada, Mexico and the United States, to stimulate economic growth and give the NAFTA countries equal access to each other’s markets. Some of the promised benefits were 200,000 new U.S. jobs from NAFTA per year, higher wages in

Nafta Essay

1083 words - 4 pages Between the Canada, Mexico, and a Hard PlaceUnderstanding NAFTA and its EffectsTony BerensHonors English 10, Hour 2Kathryn TabkeMarch 21, 2008Introduction:The year of 1994 gave birth to a big screen legend, the Lion King, announced the election of George W. Bush as the governor of Texas, and saw a cancellation of the World Series. In the same year, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was put into effect, an event in the close past

Nafta Essay

986 words - 4 pages N.A.F.T.A. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) took effect January 1, 1994. It is a trade agreement between all three of countries of North America, which are The United States, Canada, and Mexico. The Canadian Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney, the Mexican President, Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and former U.S. President George H. Bush spearheaded the agreement. Relationships between the countries were already on good terms