This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

'napoleon On His Achievements, 1816': How Far Can One Rely On Written Sources Left By Napoleon?

793 words - 3 pages

Are these written sources open to doubt and careful scrutiny? Could it be that Napoleon was constantly and consciously concerned about his own image, and how posterity would view him in later years? By analysing this source, we hope to gain a broader perspective of Napoleon by placing it in context and evaluating its significance.

The source in question is the memoir dictated to Count Las Cases by Napoleon, written in 1816 on the island of St. Helena where Napoleon was exiled. It can be said that this is a 'hybrid' source, having the characteristic of being a primary and secondary source, such as Stendal's A Life of Napoleon (Block 2, p.38). This is a primary source in respect that Las Cases was present, writing while Napoleon was reminiscing over his past record and passing the time. Also Napoleon was there during the time he was speaking about, it is his past he was talking about. The source is also a secondary source due to Las Cases not being present during the period that Napoleon was describing, the Napoleonic Period, but of course he is just writing what he is told to write.

The memoir is useful in the respect that it is more or less an accurate record of Napoleons' past. When placing reliance on it, one should continue with caution because on one hand it is an account of his record, but one the other hand it was probably glossed by interpretations of himself. Napoleon had a habit of censoring everything that was going to be read by the public so that it would glamorise his appearance. Napoleon believed that by dictating this memoir it might help him to return to Europe, respectively England, to be placed '... under the protection of its laws, ...' (Block 2 p.29). On July 13th, 1815 Napoleon wrote a letter to Prince Regent just after the Hundred Days (March 20th-June 22nd , 1815) failure stating 'I have ended my political career' (Block 2, p.29). He wrote the letter in such wonderful, beautiful words 'and I come, like Temistocles' (Block 2, p.29), but the letter when unanswered. Napoleon stayed hopeful even up till the early 1819's that a new government would be established in Britain and grant him extradition to their country.

The first thing that comes to mind when thinking of this sources reliance is that it is one-sided. Napoleon does not admit any faults,...

Find Another Essay On 'Napoleon on his achievements, 1816': How far can one rely on written sources left by Napoleon?

Napoleon Bonaparte and his regin - Grade 10 Canadian History - Essay

4298 words - 18 pages in Russia was one of the most important, if not the most important, reason for his fall from power.” The defeat of Napoleon in Russia would give the rest of Europe the confidence to rebel against him. On December 31, 1810 Tsar Alexander I broke from the Continental system and began trading with Great Britain. The break from the Continental system was supported by the Tsar’s government and court because of their hatred of the French alliance. In

Napoleon Bonaparte and his Wish for a European System

846 words - 4 pages Towards the end of his life Napoleon Bonaparte said, “"I wished to found a European system, a European Code of Laws, a European judiciary: there would be but one people in Europe," and while he never quite achieved this vision, his attempts to do so would irrevocably transform the European political landscape. Driven by the reforming ideals of the Enlightenment, Napoleon overhauled entrenched traditional hierarchies in the areas of Europe he

Napoleon Bonaparte: A Brief History and the Good He Left Behind

1282 words - 6 pages positive ways such as education, art, and literature but was “anti-progressive” when it came to the rights of his people. Napoleon, born on August 15th, 1769 on the tiny island of Corsica, was the second born of eight children to a poor lawyer who had little connection to royalty (Dugdale). Napoleon’s family was considered radical by many and as a boy Napoleon fully embraced his Corsican heritage. Because of his mother’s adulterous relationship with

How far did the achievements of Alexander II, between 1855-1881, justify his claim to be the "Tsar Liberator"?

545 words - 2 pages getting interested at first must have been difficult. It also says a lot that after his idea first was turned down, he still brought it up later. He also showed signs of being able to let go of some of the power by ordering the Mir to handle the redemption payments, so who knows what could have happened if he hadn't been assassinated. I think that he wasn't a real Tsar Liberator, but he could easily have become one in the future.

We usually think that stories written by one author are related to one another. By making close reference to 'Twenty-One Stories' discuss how far this statement is true

806 words - 3 pages ending. Some stories have more than one twist like, 'The Hint of an Explanation', where the first climax is reached when David swallows the Host, second being '[disclosing] the collar of a priest.' Despite the flashforwards and the symbolism that Greene uses, the endings are still unpredictable.Mentioning symbolism, it is another technique favoured by Greene and his stories. Various images are presented, such as, the train in 'The Hint of an

Napoleon Bonaparte as One of the Greatest Military Leaders of all Time

1928 words - 8 pages Napoleon Bonaparte as One of the Greatest Military Leaders of all Time Napoleon Bonaparte is considered one of the greatest military leaders of all time. His victories were decisive, powerful and brought greatness to a suffering France. His military power reigned supreme for over fifteen years until the drive that got him to where he was brought him to ruin. The question that I am plagued by is; How was Napoleon able

This Essay is about Napoleon and two of his great battles

1022 words - 4 pages 17 and thus prevent his withdrawal from Quatre-Bras; Ney also erred in ordering D'Erlon's corps to turn back from Ligny on June 16, thus depriving Napoleon of the chance to destroy Blücher's army. Finally, Napoleon himself erred in massing only 124,000 men before Charleroi when he might easily have marshaled more by drawing on reserve troops left in secondary positions.

Considering the entirety of his career, was Napoleon Bonaparte good for France?

1512 words - 6 pages . However Napoleon wanted to fix the past with the Catholic Church and move on. Another one his greatest achievements was the Concordat with the Pope in 1801. This resolved the split of France resulting from the Civil Constitution of the Clergy in 1790 and healed tensions with the Catholic community. In 1790, France led by a majority of deist, reclaimed the church lands and placed the church under the power of the state. Reclaiming the lands helped

The Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and the reasoning for his failure

2504 words - 10 pages from this turbulent time as a revolutionary. Many have gone on to describe the French Emperor as an aberration. Nevertheless, Napoleon Bonaparte was produced by the French class system. The makings of a improvised upbringing and a time of indulgence of self-profit. Hence, it was only inevitable that a Napoleon Bonaparte would be unleashed on the world. The embodiment of blind ambition and survival skill that would one day be utilized to rule his

Hero: Explaining why Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the greatest French heroes

727 words - 3 pages Napoleon Bonaparte must be considered a hero in French history. Through his liberal ways of coming to power and controlling France, Napoleon was able to create unity and stability, both political and economic, in one of the most powerful nations in Europe at the time. Napoleon was not only an excellent leader, but also a dominant war strategist. He was able to conquer enemies of France and expand France’s territory. By giving people rights

'A short story tells us only one thing and that intensely' How far do you agree with his assertion

912 words - 4 pages back to Pritchett's claim, '...the short story tells us only one thing, and that, intensely'. I have shown that some short stories do conform to this, 'A Very Short Story ' being one of them as its purpose is to show how the war both created and lost love. However his theory cannot be applied to all short stories as I have clearly shown that 'The Selfish Giant' conveys more than one message that is that things are not always what they seem and that by treating people in the way you expect to be treated can be rewarding.

Similar Essays

Napoleon Bonaparte And His Military Tactics

614 words - 2 pages meeting an army, he met the all-powerful weather of Russia. His army was decimated. Napoleon's lust for power had caused his downfall. Overall, Napoleon was one of the greatest men ever to rule a great empire. Both a military and political genius, he conquered most of Europe in only five years. He also introduced the ideas of meritocracy and equality for all before the law. Although Napoleon had a great lust of power that eventually brought his downfall, overall he was one of the greatest conquerors. He was only struck down by two obstacles: the Russian weather and lust for power.

How Far Did Napoleon Bonaparte Maintain The Revolutionary Ideals Of Liberty And Equality In France?

2528 words - 10 pages Aïsha Atherly November 2006European HistoryHow far did Napoleon Bonaparte maintain the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality in France?Prior to the French Revolution, the system of government was based on Absolute Monarchy which meant that the monarch claimed total authority of the state. They were answerable to no one and their word was law. At that time, the social structure in France was in need of desperate reform. It was divided

Analysis Of Napoleon As An Individual In History; Particular Attention Is Paid To Napoleon's Role As Emperor And The Abilities That Allowed Him To Accomplish His Fantastic Achievements,

1660 words - 7 pages ." Nevertheless, he was still a typical man of the eighteenth century, a rationalist, a philosophe. Far from relying on intuition, he placed his trust in reason, in knowledge, and in methodical effort..." (Memoirs, 92)However, many French exhibited common characteristics of the Enlightenment; what set Napoleon apart was his self-driven need to lead, conquer and especially his incredible ability to project an image of himself and his endeavors which

Why Napoleon Can Come To Power A Second Time?

849 words - 4 pages did not use any war to win this restoration. Although Napoleon was beaten by War of the Sixth coalition, Napoleon still has a great prestige among the people. When Napoleon restoration, he successive wins a few games, sparked the honor of the French people, to consolidate his position in France. If someone doubts that why Napoleon can come to power a second time, he brings honor to the whole French people is the first reason. Second, Napoleon