Napster Case Study

1777 words - 7 pages

Outline
I. Introduction
Napster allowed the free download of the various music files which enraged the music companies because it resulted in losses to them. The legal complications had implications for the music industry.
II. Body
a. The decision makers such as music companies, MP3 software companies, retailers, artists, and consumers expressed their views pertaining to the functioning of Napster.
b. The decision makers wanted to achieve their objectives. They also suffered from their various limitations.
c. There was a need for finding an alternative business model in order to avoid the demise of Napster.
III. Conclusion
The legal complications have compelled the Napster and other interested parties to find a solution to the legal problems that emerged due to the cases filed by the music companies against Napster. Control system plan could assure the music companies that their demands would be fulfilled.

Napster: Catalyst for a new industry or Just another Dot.com?
The Napster website has been able to attract large number of internet users who are allowed unlimited downloading of their favorite music albums in the forms of MP3 files. Earlier the music enthusiasts had to depend on the CDs marketed by the larger music companies. The artists also had to depend on the support given by the big five music companies for the publicity to their artistic works. The Napster software solved the problems of the music enthusiasts and the artists. However, the free downloading of the MP3 files affected the interest of the big five music companies as they claimed that their copy rights were being violated by the Napster website.
The legal complications were the main cause for the problems for the Napster. The music companies approached the courts demanding justice as they had invested huge amount of money for producing the music works. Their interest was being affected by the music downloads through the Napster website. The courts gave decision in favor of the music companies. This created a problem for Napster to allow downloading of an authorized music. The main decision makers were Napster, music companies, artists, retailers, the Recording Industry Association of America, and the consumers. They had to decide regarding the new practice of using MP3 files downloaded from the internet. The Napster had to respond to the court decisions which had challenged its way of functioning. Napster is the central place of indexing of the music albums which could be downloaded free of cost by the music lovers. However, the court gave the verdict against this practice suggesting that Napster needed to find an alternative business model. Finding an alternative business model became the major problem for the Napster. The problem for the big five music companies was the nature of their relationship with the Napster. They believed that Napster dealing had allowed the violation of their copy rights leading to the loss of millions of dollars to them.
However, some music...

Find Another Essay On Napster Case Study

Napster Essay

534 words - 2 pages Napster         Napster is a computer program where you can download music from the Internet. It's like a big community of people sharing music with each other. It costs nothing and you just search for the songs of your choice. I personally believe that people should be able to download music off Napster because it's just like the VCR, radio, and tape and it's a good way to promote music when it is used as intended

NAPSTER Essay

587 words - 2 pages As we are coming to the end of the twentieth century, this era is marked with computers, more advanced machines, more efficient and quicker ways of transportation, and overall achievements. While third world countries such as Africa are pondering how they will manage to put food on the table that night or try to stop continuous starvation, famine and hunger problems have plagued their continent for ages. Hunger, starvation, and famine, are

Napster

732 words - 3 pages industry for failing to see the potential of music sharing on the Internet. Henley makes a great point stating, "Lawsuits should not be used to destroy a viable and useful independent Internet distribution system." This case is not about any diminution in the value of Plaintiffs' copyrights; none has occurred or is reasonably foreseeable as the result of Napster. This case is about whether Plaintiffs can use their control over music copyrights to

Napster

1430 words - 6 pages . Therefore, Fanning's brothers are not the ones, who own all the songs in the cyberspace. However, several music industries and artist tried to shut down Napster. The copyright protection of music distribution in Napster's case is a much better solution than just banning the Fanning's software. Everybody can be a member of Napster by download its software at www.napster.com. After swapping and downloading the music files from other members of Napster

Napster, From Freeware To Business Model

2725 words - 11 pages , saying it isn't accurate because it doesn't accurately measure the fact that online sales have eaten into the local music purchases.         Other survey's support Napsters case and oppose that of the R.I.A.A.'s.         According to the "Pulse Finder on-campus market study". More than half of college student's (58%) have used Napster to download online music, 79% will buy music CD's. (Results based upon 1,200 students

Napster: From Illegal Weapon to Killer Application

836 words - 3 pages -sharing shifted the entertainment market from a commodity base to a service base by eliminating cost to the customer. This paper will discuss the major issues in this case study, who the key stakeholders are and how they have changed since Napster’s beginning, what the stakes were for the different constituencies associated with Napster’s first and second incarnation, why Napster was unable to succeed in the marketplace, and what the appropriate

Cyber Theft: Rise and Fall of Napster

1853 words - 7 pages hammer that is too small for the job it will not fix the problem. If you use a large hammer on a small problem it will crush it and make things worse. In the case of Napster type file sharing, law enforcement is a large hammer. Law enforcement agencies actively investigating and arresting file sharing perpetrators will not make the file sharing problem worse but may make society less safe.For example, a study by the Utah Commission on Criminal and

Napster Alternatives

970 words - 4 pages and downloading copyrighted songs for free is protected by law as long as Napster members themselves aren't making money from the recordings." (Barry par 3) So therefore Napster is nothing illegal, and neither are their users as long as no one is making money off the music. Just as Napster became popular and familiar to almost everyone with a computer, the company lost its court case. This meant that Napster had to block all copyrighted music

Napster Ethics.

991 words - 4 pages , we may want to look at it from the consumers point of view. The consumers are the ones Napster and the artist need to please because the music-listing consumers are the ones who purchase the product, which in this case the product is, music. I will say if Napster took the time to do some research and looked into the legalities of downloading the artist work, they may not have the legal problems they are having today. Napster is kind of like

Napster: The Copyright Battle

1388 words - 6 pages . In this paper, I will discuss legal implications of peer-to-peer file sharing. The most famous case was the Napster lawsuits. I was interested because I got a cease and desist letter spring 2000. I stopped but I never quite understood what the difference was between file-sharing and recording music off the radio, which I later learned was illegal also. This paper will explore if the current copyright laws provide the protection necessary for

Napster Problem or Solution

2364 words - 9 pages the case is still going on. In early August, the courts decided that Napster must shut down its server, effectively cutting off all of its users. This was handed down in the form of an injunction. Shortly after, the decision was appealed and the case continued. Napster went back online, and the court case is continued. Recently Bertelsmann, owner of BMG Records, dropped its part of the suit and settled out of court with Napster. Some

Similar Essays

Napster Essay 1780 Words

1780 words - 7 pages Introduction The Napster case study differs greatly from the Ryanair case study in many aspects. During the time of this case study Napster was a free to use file sharing program. Because of its controversial nature and the fact that it was free to use we must focus on areas such as the products lifecycle and objectives of Napster as well as its effects on the music industry. What is Napster? Napster is a program that makes it extremely easy

The Napster Debate Essay

653 words - 3 pages The debate rages on about whether Napster is pirating the music industry and violating copyright laws or if Napster is just a means of exchanging music as is the case with copying CD's or recording music off the radio. Several giant companies in the entertainment industry have brought suit against Napster saying that Napster is infringing on copyright laws that their music is protected under. A judge has already issued a temporary

Napster Essay 1939 Words

1939 words - 8 pages partnerships with other industry leaders in foreign markets. As mentioned, they are partners with a number of very innovative companies in the far eastern countries such as Japan. There is almost no room for differentiation in the digital music industry. This forces Napster to focus on being more users friendly and cheaper. But as it was mentioned in the case, because of free peer-to-peer file sharing suppliers and competition from the likes of Yahoo

Napster Essay 981 Words

981 words - 4 pages his software. Although the Napster seems to portray its service as the "functional equivalent" of storing its users' CDs, in actuality it is replaying for the subscriber a converted version of the recording it copied. On its face, this makes out a presumptive case of infringement under the Copyright Act of 1976. In the case the defendant, Napster, argued that such coping is protected by the affirmative defense of "Fair Use"; under such a defense, a