Napster: The Copyright Battle Essay

1388 words - 6 pages

Once upon a time a website provided free music through peer-to-peer file sharing. This was a new technology for the public for a several reasons. The price of home computers had declines dramatically and many people could now afford one. Because of the affordability, many people who had never used a computer suddenly found themselves enmeshed in the new media. Not only could people do their e-mail, do paperwork, play games and use all the different applications they now could also share their files with others. Of course, they wanted to share one of our most valued pleasures, our love of music. The public was not aware that this type of file sharing was illegal because it was not clear on the website disclaimer. Most people did not understand United States copyright laws or the concept of Fair Use. It was the golden age of the internet and everyone was happy with his or her new toy. In this paper, I will discuss legal implications of peer-to-peer file sharing. The most famous case was the Napster lawsuits. I was interested because I got a cease and desist letter spring 2000. I stopped but I never quite understood what the difference was between file-sharing and recording music off the radio, which I later learned was illegal also. This paper will explore if the current copyright laws provide the protection necessary for intellectual property. If not, does it need to be revised? Can the Fair Use Doctrine and the new technology co-exist in the same world?
According to Wikipedia (2011), “Napster was an online music peer-to-peer file sharing service created by Shawn Fanning while he was attending Northeastern University in Boston. The service, named after Fanning's hairstyle-based nickname, operated between June 1999 and July 2001. Its technology allowed people to easily share their MP3 files with other participants, bypassing the established market for such songs and thus leading to massive copyright violations of music and film media as well as other intellectual property". This actually was a promising idea. There are many independent musicians, writers and various other artist that cannot afford to promote their work and develop a following. This was virtually a free way to advertise their product without trying to get a contract with a company to distribute and promote their work. As long as the artist had given permission for the use of the work, there was not a problem. The copyright laws of the United States provides for the artist to benefit from his/her intellectual property for a set period. Then the work goes into the public domain. However, this was not the case with Napster. The first problem was that they were allowing distribution of copyrighted work without permission or compensation to the artist. Second, it appears that they knowingly promoted their product once they were informed that copyright infringement was being practice with the assistance of their site.
According to Jeff Tyson, there were several reasons why the...

Find Another Essay On Napster: The Copyright Battle

Copyrights Essay

2576 words - 10 pages . copyright law is on the minds and tongue of most people.In a lawsuit filed recently, the Recording Industry Association of America charges Napster with violating federal and state laws through contributory and vicarious copyright infringement," because it has created a forum that lets on-line users trade unauthorized music files directly from their personal computers." An underlying assumption of the technology and the service is that people determine

Napster Essay

1939 words - 8 pages technology Napster had to deal with copyright infringement charges brought about by the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America). Despite the fact that Napster emerged from this battle they still suffer from being tagged as the company that was caught in legal trouble. For this reason, many people who have limited knowledge in online music downloading will steer clear of using Napster. The first think for Napster to take in consideration


534 words - 2 pages that the people misuse Napster by putting music onto cd's. This problem is not a new one. People have been copying music on audio as well as video tapes for a long time. Napster is just another source to obtain music. According to Courtney Love "stealing our copyright provisions in the dead of night when no-one is looking is piracy. It's not piracy when kids swap music over the Internet using Napster. There were more than one billion

The Napster Debate

653 words - 3 pages The debate rages on about whether Napster is pirating the music industry and violating copyright laws or if Napster is just a means of exchanging music as is the case with copying CD's or recording music off the radio. Several giant companies in the entertainment industry have brought suit against Napster saying that Napster is infringing on copyright laws that their music is protected under. A judge has already issued a temporary

Downloading songs from the Internet: is it robbery or free expression? A specific look at Napster Inc

822 words - 3 pages instant messages, chat rooms, and Hot List user bookmarks. Napster does not condone copyright infringement, but leaves no opportunity in the software to stop this from happening. Napster also does not provide artists with royalties for their music. People can now download music for free in their own homes and artists can release their music themselves. This could mean the end of record labels and other associated companies, causing artists and

Copyright Laws and regulations issues

1986 words - 8 pages continue to be hacked" (Scheschuk 60). The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) accuses Napster of "contributory infringement and vicarious infringement," not of direct copyright violation. Because of this, The Staple Article Of Commerce Doctrine defends Napster of contributory infringement because Napster provides other non-infringing uses such as sampling, space shifting, and the authorized distribution of music. The Audio Home Recording

Napster Alternatives

970 words - 4 pages (RIAA). RIAA claims that Napster has committed copyright infringement of artists' music by allowing its users to share music without charging to use the service. "On December 8th, 1999 the RIAA filed a lawsuit against Napster for copyright infringement and is asking for $100 million in damages. The suit also represented 18 recording labels" (Meehan 7). There are two distinct opposing viewpoints on Napster. "Napster is about facilitating piracy

Is File-Sharing via Internet Illegal?

1649 words - 7 pages today has heard of Napster, the program invented by wunderkind Shawn Fanning that allows for the millions of net users to share music each other.  This technology has come under heavy fire recently, especially from the recording industry, which claims that Napster knowingly allows and even encourages the violation of copyright law, depriving both the artist and the industry of the fruits of their labor.  Supporters counter that the technology

Napster, P2P software, and the Sharing of Music in the Digital Age.

2092 words - 8 pages , Metallica and Dr. Dre as well as various other artists filed lawsuits accusing Napster of copyright infringement. In their legal battle with the RIAA, Napster’s lawyers based their case on three past rulings: Sony Betamax, the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act, and the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act. In the Sony Betamax case, the Motion Picture Association of America filed a lawsuit against Sony claiming that its new video recording technology

Napster- What is it?

881 words - 4 pages the cost per CD is spent on the making of the CD and the paying of the royalties the rest is swallowed by the greedy record companies for them and their share holders. So as you can imagine when Napster became famous the record companies weren't happy, so they took Napster to court suing them for breech of copyright laws. When actually Napster weren't in breach of any laws as they were not distributing any copyrighted material themselves, actually

The Effects of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998

1432 words - 6 pages Napster get to take advantage of Napster software for free. The users can download whatever music they want and burn it on to a C.D. for their own personal enjoyment at no cost. That is one reason why Napster was so popular at its prime. “Under the rules of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, it is the Internet service provider’s duties to remove a user from its service if it receives a complaint about them allegedly violating a

Similar Essays

The Legal Issue With Napster And The Music Industry

1488 words - 6 pages the copyright laws to permit Napster to exist. As long as a user of Napster is using the program for personal use and does not gain proceeds from it the program is not being used illegally. Napster cites the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act, which allows anyone to copy music for "noncommercial use"(Kahn 50). This act basically states that anyone may record music for personal use, but not for a profit of any kind. The act also makes no mention of

Napster Essay

1780 words - 7 pages to find and download music in MP3 format. It is a widely know fact that no laws were breached in the writing of the program that allows for the transfer of files across the Internet via peer to peer connection although the bulk of the files transferred through Napster are songs that are protected under United States copyright law. The people who use Napster and download MP3's have not paid for the legal use of this copyrighted material, and these

Untitled Essay

765 words - 3 pages the question, are programs like Napster illegal or does the program actually have some validity.There are several people against the use of programs like Napster. The band Metallica filed the first federal suit against Napster. The band is suing the company for copyright infringement and racketeering. Lars Ulrich, the band drummer says; "Napster hijacked our music without asking. They never sought out permission. Out catalog of music simply

Napster, From Freeware To Business Model

2725 words - 11 pages Napster citing that the music-sharing network encourages copyright infringement by allowing people to swap songs for free. Also debating that Napster harms the industry by slowing CD sales.         The R.I.A.A. has asked judge Marilyn Hall Patal to ban Napster from posting songs by Major Labels. The R.I.A.A. represents music labels BERTELSMANN'S BMG, EMI, Sony, time Warner's Warner music and Seagrams universal music who all filed lawsuits