Nation State And Transnational Entities Essay

2066 words - 8 pages

There is a distinct difference between a nation, state, and nation-state. Modern Nation-State developed over the 20th century to compensate for the inadequacy portrayed by pluralistic empires and extreme nationalism. It is as a result of states seeking to expand their fixed territory that various wars emerged. Countries in Europe after experiencing the full effect of such wars opted to integrate thus forming the EU which is a transnational entity. In order to enjoy the full benefits of globalization it is expected in future transnational entity will play a major role than individual modern nation-state. Nevertheless, currently modern nation-states, still want to maintain the distinct characteristics of modern nation-states while still being members of transnational entity.
Characteristic of Modern National State
With exception of Antarctica, every other square mile of land surface on this planet is owned by a certain nation-state (Opello & Rosow, 2004). This is the first significant characteristic of a modern nation-state in today’s global order. Modern nation-state is a form of political-military rule with sovereignty power over its defined territory. Within this territory the state is suppose to exercise its jurisdiction free from interference and influence from other states and entities. Apart from outside interference, individuals and/or group within the territory of a modern nation-state are prohibited from using coercion over the population without authority from the state. Only the government of the modern state can legitimately use physical coercion over its population (Opello & Rosow, 2004; Gepin, 2010).
The effectively Government effectively run the modern state through a system of bureaucracy; public offices are assigned certain important roles. The civil servant and government employees have to act in accordance with the state jurisdiction (Opello & Rosow, 2004). Even the highest form of authority, the ruler, has no autonomous power in a modern nation-state. The ruler’s role is only to serve and protect the interest of the state, he or she cannot claim or exercise authority that depicts him/her as the owner of the state. Actually the ruler is a representative of the people, supposedly assigned to that position through a rational process of fair and sincere periodic election. Every adult in the population is supposed to choose his/her preferred leader from a list of eligible candidates (Gepin, 2010). The role of population in modern nation-state therefore can not be overstated. Actually, the peaceful existence of such a state largely depends on the sense of nationalism and loyalty of its population (Opello & Rosow, 2004).
Nation, State, and Nation-State
To a layman, there is no difference between a state and a nation; in fact even experts in this matter sometime used the terms synonymously. A state, nation, and nation-state differ from each other in a couple of ways. For starters, a nation is not necessarily...

Find Another Essay On Nation-State and Transnational Entities

Russia's way to Nation- and State-Building

5314 words - 21 pages NATION- AND STATE-BUILDING IN RUSSIA(882-1914)Supervisor: Sjoerd WillenVictor Cebotari ID 6026184Pigeonhole 958Date: 14-12-2010Bloody Diversity: Country FileFinal Version5085 wordsTABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction...................................................................................... 1Plurality of politics in Kievan Rus'................................................... 3Emergence of Muscovy in the 16th century

Globalisation of The Economy and The Nation State

9788 words - 39 pages just as much, if not more, anxiety than the realignments in the labour markets. It has, for example, been claimed that capital mobility renders the tax basis increasingly footloose and thereby seriously reduces the nation states' ability to conduct redistribution policies. (Kurzer, 1993, for example, adopts this view. Claims about dire consequences of globalisation for the nation state are, however, nothing new. Garrett, 1998a, summarises the

What is the impact of globalization on the sovereignty and autonomy of the nation-state?

1527 words - 6 pages groups, across national boundaries. This has facilitated the transnationalization of politics and the growth of new centres of authority above, below and alongside the nation state, e.g. the UK government may be subject to the actions of other bodies such as the EU, the UN, the WHO, the NATO, the Scottish and Welsh Assemblies and multi-national corporations. Alongside global polity is a developing system of a transnational civil society, which


1213 words - 5 pages Corporations on the performance of domestic firms. Indirect effects of Greenfield investments can be significant since there are many domestic firms than Transnational Corporations in the business sector in many countries. Example of indirect effect is spillovers.Transnational corporations usually have limited private economic goals while nation states have a broader range of economic and non-economic objectives (Saee, 87). Transnational corporations


2258 words - 10 pages be placed in the light of a bigger phenomenon called globalization. Globalization makes the world figuratively smaller and more compressed in terms of time and space. According to Inda and Rosaldo (2008), globalization creates interconnection and relations between places and people that go beyond the territorial borders of a nation state. This transnational and global element makes migrants people “Who inhabit imagined communities of belonging

Characteristics of the Modern Nation-State

1503 words - 6 pages This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics. Some of the characteristics that make up a modern

Globalization, Transnationality and Cultural Diversity

1855 words - 8 pages consider states as politically sovereign entities with unified political and economic systems within defined borders and citizens similar according to legal and cultural practices. This belief assumes nation-states more or less homogenous based on culture and ethics, so it defines culture as a series of internally evolved characteristics with little or no outside influence. It neglects the transnational dimension of cultures in a global

Origin vs. Settlement

1231 words - 5 pages The United States is a country which gathers people from different places. Those people who cross over from another country to America the transnational people. There are some critiques which argue that the transnational people will only keep their origins and return to their home country. If they are involved in politics, it will only benefit their original countries. However, I think those transnational people are trying to find their

Pink Panthers

1989 words - 8 pages hand globalization is intended to be a positive force around the world. However, on the other hand, this phenomenon creates greater opportunities for transnational criminal organizations. Given that they operate at global level and are facilitated by global occurrences, they must also be policed in a manner that deals with transnational law, rather than within the borders of each nation. One of the key issues with trying ot regulate and police


1836 words - 8 pages and TNCs Like the variance in the roles many states take on, the interactions of states and TNCs can differ greatly. While it depends significantly on the form of capitalism the state adheres to, the relationship most states have with TNCs seems to be generally synergistic. TNCs are dependent on countries, and the states within, for their very existence, as they are national legal entities that are formed under the laws of a particular nation

Transnational Postcolonial Feminist Theorizing

2355 words - 9 pages themselves in opposition in transnational conferences where activists and academics, as well as other women representing diverse interests, from formal political participation within the state to indigenous movements against the state, attempt to come to common understandings. Narratives abound about the limits of these gatherings aiming to represent diverse women's interests and create coalitions between them, which often end up representing the

Similar Essays

The Characteristics Of The Nation State And Transnational Entities

1285 words - 5 pages Nation-states deal certain characteristics of self-rule, organized government, territory, and population. Self-rule implies that nation-states rule themselves. They are free and not colonies of some other country. For example, the U.S. was a colony of Great Britain until the American Revolution. As a consequence of the American Revolution, the United States formed a nation-state. Organized government is the manner in which nation-states rule

Treaty Of Westalphia And The Nation State

2008 words - 8 pages national interests (Moeller 1986, p78).A State is defined, inter alia, as a politically organized body of people under a single government. This definition is institutionally oriented. A geographically oriented definition states that a "State" is a territory occupied by a nation. It can be seen that the term "State" can be defined in conjunction and reference to a range of different things. Thus in understanding this term and its complexities in

Comparing A Nation And A State

1614 words - 6 pages Comparing a Nation and a State The world is organized by man-made boundaries that divide land into sovereign states, (excluding Antarctica). Early states formed through empires, conquest, and colonialism, were held together by religious based rule. The Treaty of Westphalia lessened the powers of religious figures the Catholic Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor, which ended religious wars in Europe in 1648 . This transformation marks the

State And Nation Building In Arica

2724 words - 11 pages African countries are independent and sovereign; however, most of the African countries are going under stress. This is largely because most of the African states are not nation-states, where African leaders neglect nation-building and rather focus on state-building. They seek to provide human security and other needs necessary to build the state. However, by state-building, it is an act which is at the expense of others religious and ethnic