This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

National Security Vs. Civil Liberties. Essay

533 words - 2 pages

The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed to repeat history if we fail to learn from it, an examination into the circumstances of the Japanese American internment in 1942 may inform the ways to most effectively deal with the security concerns faced by Americans today.
There is a paradox in American theories of democracy and freedom. As the United States has fought abroad in the name of freedom, we have simultaneously restricted the personal freedoms of people in the country. When President Franklin D. Roosevelt engaged in battle in World War II, it was not only to retaliate against the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor but to bring down the Nazi regime that was murdering people in Europe. At the same time, Roosevelt had nearly 120,000 Japanese Americans, the majority of whom were American citizens or legal permanent residents, rounded up into internment camps, violating their civil rights to be treated with fairness and equality, without discrimination and the Fifth Amendment liberty of due process.
In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal...

Find Another Essay On National Security vs. Civil Liberties.

Civil Liberty vs. Security Essay

2179 words - 9 pages . And these freedoms and protections apply to all citizens, and should not be taken away for the sake of national security. In any case, taking away these liberties does not help to increase national security, but helps the government to have more control over its people and gain more power. If the government can use the excuse of national security as a way for people to hand over their civil liberties, it slowly sets the precedent and more and more

National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

3061 words - 12 pages authentication for airport maintenance workers, armed air marshals traveling on flights, and teaching flight attendants are all examples of suggested security measures that have no effect on individual privacy or liberties. (Schneier 773) This is simply one way that security can be achieved without hindering privacy. It is still necessary to check I.D. and do background checks on suspicious persons; however, it is not necessary to constantly

National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

790 words - 3 pages were plaguing American ships in the early eighteenth century, we will have to find an acceptable way to bring our strength to bear against these terrorists.   On all these issues, the university students of today-not just the law students-are the policymakers of tomorrow. They might as well join the fray now. It will be their civil liberties at stake-as well as their universities, office towers, and 767s that could be on future target

Indiviual Privacy vs National Security

1499 words - 6 pages ‘Angry Birds’-- were used as a cover up from the National Security Agency (NSA) to observe and record citizen’s actions. Yet in a fast paced life, humans don’t stop and think about these occurrences and continue on living their lives. Connecting to Restak, he stated that technology has enveloped humanity into a restricted time limit to our surroundings as technology is at our central focus. Because the brain’s attention span is short to focus on

Individual Rights Vs. National Security

878 words - 4 pages I negate the resolution, "Resolved: When the United States is engaged in military conflict, national security ought to supercede conflicting claims of individual rights. My value for the round is Human Dignity, or what can be defined as a respect for the individual and his or her rights and virtues. John Stuart Mill states that "Everyone who receive the protection of society owes a return for the benefit... but not to the point that it violates

The Demands Of National Security Vs. Individual Rights

716 words - 3 pages No form of government can survive... when the life of the nation is at stake." Because I agree with Clinton Rossiter, I affirm the resolution that When the United States is engaged in military conflict, the demands of national security ought to supersede conflicting claims of individual rights.Definitions from Encarta World English DictionaryEngaged in Military Conflict means fighting open warfare.Demands of national security means protection

American Civil Liberties: Do Americans Have Enough Protections for Civil Liberties, or Not?

1742 words - 7 pages violated. In conclusion although some civil liberties in the past years have gained protections others have lost them, meaning that without a level of biasness it cannot be determined whether Americans need more protections for civil liberties, or less. References Cole, D., & Dempsey, J. X. (2006). Terrorism and the constitution: sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security. New York: New Press. Friedman, L. S. (2010). What Is the

American civil liberties are defined as civil rights designed with the purpose of limiting government intervention in citizen’s affairs (Civil Lib

1113 words - 5 pages American citizens to have to live without the civil liberties they are assured that they will receive. Also in an attempt to infiltrate terrorist organizations, interrogation tactics have become brutal and grotesque. Despite the victim’s criminal status, basic rights the law guarantees such people are being defiled. The government has taken action in an attempt to improve national security, but many of those actions do not correspond with civil

loose construction

896 words - 4 pages Constructionism." Shmoop.com. Shmoop University, Inc., 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 21 Feb. 2014. . Troy, Michael. "U.S. History/Strict vs. Loose Construction." U.S. History: Strict vs. Loose Construction, strict constructionists, us air force. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Feb. 2014. . Williams, Frank J. . "Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties in Wartime." The Heritage Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Feb. 2014. .

The War on Terrorism is an Attack on American Civil Liberties

832 words - 3 pages privacy, and racial profiling. Works Cited * Ashcroft, John. "The War on Terrorism Has Not Eroded Civil Liberties."   Civil Liberties: Opposing Viewpoints.  Ed. Auriana Ojeda.  New York: Greenhaven Press, 2004.   * * Campbell, Geoffrey.  A Vulnerable America: An Overview of National Security.  Farmington Hills, MI: Lucent Books, 2004. * * Cassak, Lance, and Milton Hewmann.  Good cop, Bad cop: Racial Profiling and Competing Views of

We Must Regain Our Lost Civil Liberties

1676 words - 7 pages or shouldn't be allowed for arresting terrorists. However, the question remains as to how these devices are going to be used, and how personally are those who use them held accountable. The purpose of this paper is to confirm that the proposed monitoring and archiving of users’ information on social networking sites would represent yet another erosion of our civil liberties for only a minor gain to our national security. The USA

Similar Essays

Civil Liberties Vs National Security Essay

683 words - 3 pages someone's phone line, but eventually, they will want to put spy cameras in people's residences, and video record their private lives at home. This law can only lead to one bad thing after another. People's freedoms and privacies should not be sacrificed in the names of "safety" and "prevention."The Espionage Act of 1917 is a perfect example of when Americans' liberties were taken away in the name of national security. After the US entered WW1

The Usa Patriot Act Of 2001: Need For National Security Vs. Protection Of Civil Liberties

1436 words - 6 pages signed in to law by former President George W. Bush in 2001, has been at the focus of political, media, and private scrutiny since its conception. While its proponents argue the need for government immersion to combat the probability of future and/or current terrorist activity and nation security concerns, adversaries question the scale of impedance on individual civil liberties. Specific subjects of controversy being addressed include the use

Cointelpro National Security Vs. Civil Liberty Essay

1455 words - 6 pages the Soviet Union it was being used to infiltrate and destroy certain groups and individuals on America's own soil. COINTELPRO targeted selective radical groups. Theses groups were viewed as powerful enough to make changes happen. These groups were by viewed by the F.B.I as threats to national security. Some of the groups attacked were socialist groups, a prominent one being the Socialist Worker Party (SWP). Also targeted were several African

The Patriot Act Vs Civil Liberties

1191 words - 5 pages tolerated. “The sad truth is that most Americans have already lost the battle when it comes to keeping personal information absolutely private.”( Lee, M.Dilascio, Tracey M.4). Work Cited Lee, M.DiLascio, Tracey M. "Counterpoint: The Patriot Act Is Necessary For National Security." Points Of View: Homeland Security & Civil Liberties (2013): 3. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 9 Feb. 2014. Belanger, CraigNewton, Heather. "Point: The