This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

National Security Vs. The Right To Privacy

790 words - 3 pages

When the Challenger space shuttle blew up. Students gathered in the student lounge for hours, watching in disbelief. In a way, it was more existential than September 11. We watched the same ten seconds of the shuttle explosion over and over again, without there being a trace of the Shuttle anywhere in the world. That day was a technological disaster, a mechanical disaster that Americans, in our inimical fashion, could quickly fix.

What students watched on September 11, 2001 was a social and political disaster. Watching the events unfold was a lot less existential and a lot more practical because it is a disaster that will have a far greater impact on their world-and they, in turn, can affect that impact.


In the next months and years, we as a society will rethink everything from privacy to business organizations to architecture. Businesses will look at Morgan Stanley's experience-occupying much of the World Trade Center-and think again about the virtues of further decentralization of operations. Just as architecture in the 1970s seemed to respond to the turmoil of the 1960s (consider the fortress-like administration building at the University of Michigan or the FBI building in Washington), we may see architecture change in the future. Aside from a defiant impulse to rebuild the World Trade Center itself, perhaps we will want smaller buildings-that are easier to evacuate and not as self-promotingly visible. Perhaps we will insist, despite what our engineers tell us, that big buildings be built stronger. Consider that when an admittedly lighter, slower plane (a B-25 bomber traveling at about 200 mph) crashed into the Empire State Building in 1945, that majestic skyscraper sustained relatively little damage.


But most of our rethinking will concern law-how we will balance understandable demands for improved security with our right to privacy, our freedom to travel, our free speech, our policy of welcoming immigrants, and our commitment to a tolerant society. Once we learn how the terrorists learned to fly these Boeing planes, should we place new restrictions on pilot training? Access to flight simulators? First Amendment experts may rightly be concerned about such restrictions-we may have, in effect, a replay of the debates about publishing how to build a bomb.


As to privacy, expect a rash of proposals to improve security which will have varying degrees of impact on people's anonymity....

Find Another Essay On National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

Encryption: Privacy versus National Security Essay

2531 words - 10 pages key values.[1]  Although triple DES is widely used, it has not been adopted as an official standard, and eventually computing power will be sufficient to crack it as well.  So, the search for a new standard of encryption is currently underway.  The government is looking for a standard that will allow it to provide national security, and researchers as well as the computing public want the highest-level possible of privacy and security

National Security Agency, Privacy and Security for American Citizens

882 words - 4 pages (FISA) was enacted for the purposes of outlining protocol for collection of foreign intelligence using electronic surveillance of communications or persons (Brazen, p 2). In 2007, the Act was amended to include the Protect America Act, stating that the National Security Agency had the right to monitor electronic communications between people on U.S. soil, if believed to be a threat, without court supervision (Nakashima and Warrick). The Protect

The Right to Privacy

1236 words - 5 pages      In this report I am going to talk about the rights people have to privacy and about the laws that go with privacy. Privacy is the thought that information that is confidential that is disclosed in a private place will not be available to third parties when the information would cause embarrassment or emotional distress to a person.      The right of privacy is limited to people who are in

The Right to Privacy

1297 words - 6 pages helped establish the “exclusionary rule” which aided in protecting our individual liberties against a government that tried to take them away. The government has the right to protect the security of our nation, but should not take it to the point where it is impeding on our daily lives and rights. One such way that the government impedes on our daily lives, and our privacy is through the Patriot Act which was passed in 2001 to combat the

The Right to Privacy

1031 words - 5 pages privacy is not written word for word in any one amendment. It is through the collective wording of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments that we, as Americans, are given the most important right to ensuring the existence to freedom. The first major Supreme Court case to address the issue of the right to privacy was Lochner v. New York which was ruled in 1905. This case was brought to the courts to rule on the

The Right to Privacy

1856 words - 7 pages Individuals are born with certain liberty and freedom. Some freedom are being protected by the Bill of Rights, like freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly, and some are not. Privacy is one of the rights that was not mention in the Constitution. The definition of the right to privacy is the right to be left alone without government’s intrusion. Throughout history the Supreme Court has been ruling in favor of the right to privacy like in

The Right to Privacy

1170 words - 5 pages The Right to Privacy by Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy examines different privacy cases throughout history that has set precedents in today’s courts. The first section focuses on ‘Privacy v. Law Enforcement’ and examines three different cases dealing with three different aspects of privacy when it comes to law enforcement. Strip search, drug interdiction, and school search are the three types cases that Alderman and Kennedy decide to shed

The Public's Right to know vs The Individual's Right to Privacy

1899 words - 8 pages The Oscar Pistorius murder trial has brought to light the ever-present tensions between an individual’s right to privacy, especially when they are a public figure and the media’s right to freedom of expression especially when the information is in the public interest. South Africa as a country with a history of discrimination always strives to uphold all the rights of its citizens so in a case such as Pistorius’ where there are two rights in

Security vs Privacy

771 words - 4 pages Do you now that the government spies on you? Is it okay for you for them to spy on or not? Since the 9/11 incident in 2001, the U.S has greatly the security throughout the whole nation this is known as the Patriot Act. There’s been a debate whether the U.S government has the right to spy on us like listening to our private conversation on our phone. In Bruce Schneier’s article “The Eternal Value of Privacy” from Wired magazine, talks about the

Privacy vs. Security

2632 words - 11 pages Privacy vs. Security Introduction Pictures seen in homes across America and throughout the world of American symbols in flames and crashing a quarter mile to the ground changed the world forever. The world's last and only superpower had been attacked in a way only conceivable in a Hollywood script. However, the physical destruction that resulted was not necessarily the biggest loss that the United States faced. The emotional destruction

Privacy Vs Security

875 words - 4 pages secret to hide and without privacy your secrets and personal information could go to the wrong hands. Another piece of evidence that showcases the strengths of Schneier's writing is in paragraph 7 where he comments, "a Constitution that it never occurred to them to call out privacy as an explicit right. This makes Schneier's the clear winner between these two articles because he uses logical reasoning to the readers that privacy is a basic

Similar Essays

National Security Vs. The Right To Privacy

3061 words - 12 pages terrorist attacks on the United States, issues about privacy now focus on national security needs to protect against further violence at the hands of individuals among us” (23). This statement is a clear depiction of how the United States should continue working towards security. It is imperative that we continue to focus our efforts on stopping terrorism before it begins; however, it must be done in ways that are not encroaching on our personal

Indiviual Privacy Vs National Security Essay

1499 words - 6 pages day without knowing they are being watched. Yet, how can this be possible of allowing this type of surveillance in today’s society? Due to this hidden surveillance, many people find this as an act of violation of one’s privacy while others declare it is for the benefit of a nation’s security against rivalry countries. “The degree to which a government is repressive does not turn on the methods by which it acquires information about its citizens, or

National Identity Cards And Citizens' Right To Privacy

785 words - 3 pages The article, “National Identity Cards Strange Liberty, Banish Privacy” by Charles Levendosky, implies that Identity Cards give us a false sense of security. The system would not prevent terrorists from using fake documents to get a national identity card and all citizens’ private information would be shared with government agencies and commercial organizations, therefore all personal information can be easily accessed through a computer system

Individual Privacy Versus National Security Essay

1871 words - 7 pages extent possible from the data subject; maintain records that are accurate, complete, timely, and relevant; and establish administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect the security of records. The Privacy Act poses little if any limit on government collection and use of personal data for national security purposes. The Privacy Act also prohibits disclosure, even to other government agencies, of personally identifiable information in