Government Surveillance Vs Privacy Essay

1620 words - 6 pages

The 21st century has brought with it a myriad of technological advancements all designed to make the lives of the developed world much easier, faster, and more fun. These new technologies are not coming without their own set of costs, though. One of the greatest prices people may be paying for their technology is the high cost of the loss of privacy that may come with many of these devices. Jim Hightower, an author for is very worried about what the new technological age will mean for privacy. In his article, “Watch Out -- the Drones Are Coming Home to Roost” ( Jim Hightower proclaims the dangers that an increased number of domestic drones will have on American privacy in an effort to urge the reader to take action against the U.S. government’s unmanned domestic drone policy that Hightower claims is being used to spy on U.S. citizens domestically.

The drones that Hightower is so worried about are, by definition, unmanned air vehicles that are piloted by trained personnel hundreds of miles away, are outfitted with cameras, and can strike using missiles at any time. Hightower employs a broad range of rhetorical figures throughout his article to decry the use of these drones domestically as an unnecessary infringement on U.S. privacy. Early in the article, Hightower employs a metaphor to put into context that the drones are merely “Orwellian Gnats” that the government is putting into our skies without answering any of the public’s questions about them. The metaphor is referring to the Orwell novel 1984 which describes a dystopia in which the government has become out of control and used technology and brain-washing to control a massive amount of people. This metaphor gives the reader the context for viewing these drones. Instead of seeing them merely as devices that can aid in the fight against crime, terrorism, or drugs, with this metaphor the reader can see the drones as part of a government that is focused on controlling and surveying its people rather than protecting them. Another rhetorical figure that Hightower employs is the synecdoche relating the imposition of domestic drones as a part of a greater scheme to provide complete surveillance on American citizens and completely erode privacy. Hightower’s main concern is not just that domestic drones will begin spying on Americans, but that these drones will become just one of many weapons used against American citizens in order to keep them in completely control. Hightower comments that with these drones, “We are on a fast track to becoming a society under routine, pervasive surveillance.” According to Hightower, these drones are becoming part of a much larger, more insidious plot to delve into the privacy of American citizens. This synecdoche much more greatly increases the impact that drones would have on the lives of American citizens. Instead of...

Find Another Essay On Government Surveillance vs Privacy

Government Surveillance Creates an Orwellian Society

876 words - 4 pages tissue paper. The government’s love of surveillance is quickly understood by the lack of privacy - from telescreens and cameras to computers and phones - that the government fervently takes in year after year. The central issue that is now being raised is how far should the government be permitted to go in restricting privacy? The powers of America have internalized and the country had spiraled into a dystopian nightmarish in Oceania in the book

Should Privacy Exist? Essay

1214 words - 5 pages Should Privacy Exist? Charles Platt discusses privacy of the individual and the possibility of an entire world under surveillance in his essay Nowhere to Hide: Lack of Privacy is the Ultimate Equalizer. He explains the different levels of privacy needed in different cultures, and he describes why he feels that invasion of privacy might lead to large institutions interfering in his life. Platt points out cases where privacy became an issue

Privacy V.S Security

819 words - 4 pages wins” by Chris Cillizza you will see which article has the best logical argument on whether or not, the privacy article or the surveillance article was best stated . In the article “The Eternal Value of Privacy” by schneier his claim towards privacy is “Privacy is an inherit human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect.” This expresses the author’s emotion towards his way of seeing how all humans

is privacy in the 21st century possible?

1191 words - 5 pages authorities catch lots of dangerous criminals through information online like emails, photos, and social media sites like Facebook some critics still feel it is an invasion of privacy. Also as our technology advances by leaps, and bounds so does the way Government uses new high tech tools to surveillance law-abiding citizens. Though our Fourth Amendment states to protect the American people from unreasonable searches and seizures. Almost everything is

Government Surveillance in the Digital Age

2344 words - 9 pages . Furthermore, they encourage all citizens to report any deviant behavior, whether it is from someone of a lower or upper class. In essence, that is the same spirit behind legalizing intrusions into people's privacy since those who make and support the laws are encouraging the arrest of anyone with suspicious behavior. However, a much more extreme example of inappropriate government surveillance is that in 1984, where there are telescreens in all possible

Public Video Surveillance

1432 words - 6 pages government buildings. COASTAL SURVEILLANCE is to detect illegal immigrants and drug importers. ROAD SAFETY is to monitor busy street and roads and the flow of traffic. IDENIFICATION is for drivers of autos, law enforcers, and government officials, Immigration just to name a few. PERFORMANCE includes surveillance over jobs to improve performance and also because of Health and Safety issues. LEGAL ISSUES Surveillance in public places does not

Protecting the Privacy of Individuals on the Internet

2641 words - 11 pages of privacy laws. There is no obvious right to privacy in the Constitution of the United States, but privacy is implied in a few of the provision in the Bill of Rights18. For example, American citizens have the right to “privacy from government surveillance into an area where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy and also in matters relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing and education”19

The People, the Nation, and the NSA

1593 words - 6 pages compile this data across America. They excuse this collection of data as a safeguard to the nation’s security. However, with the collection of personal data becoming increasingly controversial and questionable, it leaves one to wonder what exactly the government wants with the information (NSA Surveillance Programs). Following the information leaked by Edward Snowden, a twenty-three year old Central Intelligence Agency computer technician

The Growing Threat of Corporate Surveillance

1676 words - 7 pages In 1948, George Orwell wrote about a society in which individual privacy was nonexistent. In this society, which he imagined would become a reality in the 1980s, surveillance was foremost. Everything one did was under surveillance by “Big Brother”, an unseen figure who was always watching you. Surveillance in this society was imposed and malicious. Although this type of society has never fully become a reality in the Western world, changes in

We Must Regain Our Lost Civil Liberties

1676 words - 7 pages such tools as well as lower criteria for attaining the authority to use them “represents a broad expansion of power without building in a necessary privacy protection” (The USA PATRIOT Act: Myth vs. Reality, n.d.). The Patriot Act was signed into law on October 26, 2001, 45 days after the terrorist attacks on September 11th. The debate over what the Patriot Act actually allows law enforcement officials to do, however, creates focus on the

Protect the Nation or Yourself?

2125 words - 9 pages the ones watching, and they report back to the government. By making someone feel better about their privacy, the people watching telephone records only see the numbers not the names, but the government looks at the names that matches the numbers. The scope of surveillance is very broad because of crime rate. People of America in the past had more privacy. By having the government watching comes with benefits other than safety. When on the

Similar Essays

Government Surveillance Vs Personal Privacy Essay

3663 words - 15 pages privacy wiretapping from government entities such as the NSA, Patriot Act and the reduction of the Fourth Amendment. The NSA, National Security Agency, is the largest manager of United States intelligence in the country, which was given power in reaction to the rising terrorist threat to the nation. The NSA is handed the task of monitoring, collecting, and decoding information and data from foreign intelligences, which includes the surveillance of

Government Surveillance Vs Privacy Essay

1431 words - 6 pages Is the American government trustworthy? Edward Joseph Snowden (2013) released to the United States press* selected information about the surveillance of ordinary citizens by the U.S.A.’s National Security Agency (N.S.A.), and its interconnection to phone and social media companies. The motion picture Citizenfour (2014), shows the original taping of those revelations. Snowden said that some people do nothing about this tracking because they have

Privacy: The Government Vs The American People

2301 words - 9 pages because of the repetitive use the words “terrorist”, “bomb”, “9/11” and “NSA”. Next time you’re Skyping your mother on her cruise to the Bahamas, consider giving a friendly wave to the NSA agent who may be watching you. As long as the government is insistently monitoring all internet activities, and apparently our televisions as well, there will continue to an increase in civil unrest at the fact that their privacy is blatantly being invaded

Privacy And The American Government Essay

1889 words - 8 pages good people working at a store. There isn’t anything specifically stating our right to privacy. The government has not given us any sense that they want us to have privacy. The only true documentation that dances around the subject is the Bill of Rights. There have been cases where there might have been more rights of privacy granted to us. Some court cases and acts include The Wiretap Act, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and