This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

National Identity Cards And Citizens' Right To Privacy

785 words - 3 pages

The article, “National Identity Cards Strange Liberty, Banish Privacy” by Charles Levendosky, implies that Identity Cards give us a false sense of security. The system would not prevent terrorists from using fake documents to get a national identity card and all citizens’ private information would be shared with government agencies and commercial organizations, therefore all personal information can be easily accessed through a computer system. This would result in a surveillance society with many obstacles due to human errors and leaving citizens with no privacy and freedom to be themselves.

I agree with the author and I am against national ID cards primarily because they would violate citizens' right to privacy. It is acceptable to issue identity cards for specific purposes, like a driving license which is necessary and voluntary. Discrimination is also a problem when religious affiliation or ethnic background is required on ID cards which had been the case in Greece or in Malaysia where only Islam’s were required to disclose this information. Ethnic background, religion and political party should have no affiliation with the government. The same privacy is vital to victims of domestic violence, witnesses in criminal investigations and trials, and others, may not want their identity or locations to be widely known.

There are so many potential privacy violations with a national ID card program but the most important issue to address is how secure it the system and how do we identify all the failures of the system. The system will undoubtedly be exploited by people who can get legitimate cards in fraudulent names. For example, as stated in the article by Charles Levendosky, “And according to a (2001) story in the Orange County Register, 127 California Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) employees were disciplined over (previous) five years for facilitating ID fraud.” Also two of the 9/11 terrorists had valid Virginia driver's licenses in fake names. Not to mention, as stated in the article by Charles Levendosky, “the basic documents which are used to apply for this identity card would be birth certificates and Social Security cards. These documents are easily forged.” There also needs to be a security system if the card gets lost. Human errors and sloppy ID checks at airports and government...

Find Another Essay On National Identity Cards and Citizens' Right to Privacy

The 'typical Australian' and indeed, Australian national identity, does not cover the diversity of Australian citizens and many groups, including women, are excluded

1422 words - 6 pages Liberal/National Coalition). Whilst white women were not images associated with Government for a long time, in comparison, Aboriginal women (and men) were only given the right to vote in 1967 and it wasn't until last year that the first Aboriginal woman, Carol Martin, was elected to an Australian Parliament (Western Australia State Government). This example shows that even within a group of repressed people, women, there may be other sub-groups who

The Right to Privacy Essay

1236 words - 5 pages      In this report I am going to talk about the rights people have to privacy and about the laws that go with privacy. Privacy is the thought that information that is confidential that is disclosed in a private place will not be available to third parties when the information would cause embarrassment or emotional distress to a person.      The right of privacy is limited to people who are in

A Right to Privacy

856 words - 4 pages situation. Therefore, anyone who cares about this problem must contact their representative with their opinion on this matter. Furthermore, citizens must be educated and informed about their rights, and the duty of the government to protect them. An individual’s right to privacy is a fundamental right, and therefore, must be protected fiercely. As Marlon Brando once said: “ Privacy is not something that I’m merely entitled to, it’s an absolute

The Right to Privacy

1297 words - 6 pages Since the founding of the United States, our outlook on the way it treats its citizens has not changed very tremendously. Apart from the abolishment of slavery, and various other corrupt practices which were fixed, well for the most part. The concept of birthrights and unalienable rights is not very farfetched, yet our government continuously attempts to impede these rights in an attempt that should not be tested. The right to privacy is a very

Our Right to Privacy

693 words - 3 pages Most people in society think they don't have anything to hide. Everyone has the Right to privacy in technology, medical, personal life and many more areas. Its all has been an issue, sense as far back as anyone can remember. Most people in society don’t realize that it’s a much bigger issue than what it sounds to be. As many of you may not know but the 14th amendment has been involved in may cases that had to do with the Right to Privacy. The

The Right to Privacy

1031 words - 5 pages privacy is not written word for word in any one amendment. It is through the collective wording of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments that we, as Americans, are given the most important right to ensuring the existence to freedom. The first major Supreme Court case to address the issue of the right to privacy was Lochner v. New York which was ruled in 1905. This case was brought to the courts to rule on the

The Right to Privacy

1856 words - 7 pages Individuals are born with certain liberty and freedom. Some freedom are being protected by the Bill of Rights, like freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly, and some are not. Privacy is one of the rights that was not mention in the Constitution. The definition of the right to privacy is the right to be left alone without government’s intrusion. Throughout history the Supreme Court has been ruling in favor of the right to privacy like in

Celebrities' Right to PRivacy

1106 words - 5 pages celebrities life’s from our life every day there either around the camera or hiding from it. Many say that celebrates know right from wrong, just as they know left from right. So why shouldn’t they know lights and a camera go with being famous? Celebrities should not have any privacy due to the fact that there famous! They know there giving up a part of them when they become famous, but on the other hand some people think yes they are famous yes

The Right to Privacy

1170 words - 5 pages The Right to Privacy by Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy examines different privacy cases throughout history that has set precedents in today’s courts. The first section focuses on ‘Privacy v. Law Enforcement’ and examines three different cases dealing with three different aspects of privacy when it comes to law enforcement. Strip search, drug interdiction, and school search are the three types cases that Alderman and Kennedy decide to shed

England Swings into it's own Grave: England Swings, right into its own Grave. An analysis of the depiction of British National Identity in the 1973 Vincent Price horror classic "Theatre of Blood"

4953 words - 20 pages was worst about mass culture”2. As is the case with the majority of cultural phenomena, “The British Invasion” of the 1960s waned, and among its causalities was a sense of national ownership over identity. With the break-up of the Beatles, a decreasing interest in British Films, and limited initiatives on the part of the government to fund cultural industry, it seemed like their was little value to the term “British” in

Interaction of Free Speech and Right to Privacy

2096 words - 9 pages How do free speech and privacy rights interact with each other in a country? Where does the boundary lie between free speech and privacy? The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states that: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the

Similar Essays

National Identity Cards Essay

708 words - 3 pages country. Third, in addition to the fact that national ID card will not stop terrorism and illegal immigrants, it will definitely create a form of discrimination and harassment in this country. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 required employers to verify the identity of potential employees and their eligibility to work in the U.S. The Act also imposed sanction for failing to comply with the verification requirements

National Security Vs. The Right To Privacy

3061 words - 12 pages berate innocent citizens. We have all experienced some type of frustration while going through the airport. While some of it is necessary to guarantee that we arrive safely; more often that not, it feels like an invasion of privacy, and results in poor attitudes and unpleasant travel. During a recent trip to Los Angeles, a friend recounted his experience with airport security. As he stood in line at the security check-point, the airport personnel

National Security Vs. The Right To Privacy

790 words - 3 pages rethinking will concern law-how we will balance understandable demands for improved security with our right to privacy, our freedom to travel, our free speech, our policy of welcoming immigrants, and our commitment to a tolerant society. Once we learn how the terrorists learned to fly these Boeing planes, should we place new restrictions on pilot training? Access to flight simulators? First Amendment experts may rightly be concerned about such

National Security Agency, Privacy And Security For American Citizens

882 words - 4 pages (FISA) was enacted for the purposes of outlining protocol for collection of foreign intelligence using electronic surveillance of communications or persons (Brazen, p 2). In 2007, the Act was amended to include the Protect America Act, stating that the National Security Agency had the right to monitor electronic communications between people on U.S. soil, if believed to be a threat, without court supervision (Nakashima and Warrick). The Protect