Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should Be Banned In All Public Places

1104 words - 4 pages

The effects of second-hand smoke have been well-known for decades; in fact, the Surgeon General warned the public about its dangers in 1972 (Schick & Glantz, 2005). Do people knowingly have the right to put others’ health at risk? No, they do not. Exposure to cigarette smoke is a public health risk. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places, nationwide.
There has been no attempt to impose a national smoking ban by the U.S. government. All current bans are in place because of state and local legislation. Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights lists the various state and local smoking laws that have emerged since the 1980s, and the regulations vary greatly (2010). This is extremely confusing. Some states have strict smoking bans in all public places, some states have regulations that vary from city to city, and some states have no public smoking bans at all. Some states have so many regulations it is hard to keep track of them all. For example, Kansas passed a state-wide smoking ban in 2010, but that ban still exempts tobacconists, private clubs, and casinos. Prior to the state-wide ban, it had numerous local bans; some included all restaurants and bars, but others exempted restaurants and bars that did not allow patrons under 18 (Koranda & Mann, 2010).
While almost half of the states have passed statewide bans, the exemptions often make the bans useless. For example, Missouri’s Health and Welfare statutes note that people can only smoke in “designated smoking areas” in public places, but a restaurant can have up to 30% of its space designated as a smoking area, and no separate ventilation is required (2010, Section 191.767). The areas not considered “public spaces” include “bars, taverns, restaurants that seat less than fifty people, bowling alleys and billiard parlors” and “any enclosed arena, stadium, or other facility which may be used for sporting events and which has a seating capacity of more than fifteen thousand persons” (2010, Section 191.769). A parent wanting to take a child bowling or an asthmatic wishing to attend a professional hockey game would be out of luck in Missouri since those areas are not subject to public smoking bans. Lenient states like Missouri may be impeding national legislation for a federal smoking ban. These states may be scared of smoking bans because of the fears of local business owners. What they may not realize, though, is that a national smoking ban would eliminate many of these fears.
Currently, the lack of a federal law means that states or regions wishing to impose bans have to worry about the impact on businesses. In 2007, Minnesota imposed a very strict state-wide smoking ban (Zdechlik, 2007).This is good, right? The problem is that the neighboring states did not have smoking bans at the time. Some bar owners feared that the bans would hurt their businesses (Erickson, n.d.). While any ban is better than none, a nation-wide ban is most effective for everyone.
Another concern of local...

Find Another Essay On Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

Smoking Should NOT Be Banned in Public Places

737 words - 3 pages deny service to these patrons. In modern society, the government knows better than to discriminate against minorities, senior citizens, or the physically handicapped; it does not hesitate, however, to discriminate against smokers. Personal choice is a simple principle that is highly valued in American society. Banning smoking in all public restaurants violates this principle and jeopardizes our freedom. Smoking should not be banned in all

Why Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Places - English - Essay

1338 words - 6 pages Why Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places During the past few decades, it has come to light that smoking kills. We have all been equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, but have you ever considered the effects it has on other people and the environment? Smoking should be banned in all public places because secondhand smoke has serious negative health consequences, litter reduction of cigarette butts can lead to a

Ban Smoking In Public Places

587 words - 2 pages also breathe in main stream smoke, which the smoker breathes out. The pressure is now on the smoker as they are now the minority. Non smokers want to travel to work and enjoy leisure activities in a smoke free environment and it is their right. Why should I have to go out and have my health damaged and my clothes ruined or made smelly by other people with a bad and dangerous habit. Libraries and most public places have a no smoking policy

Smoking Must Be Banned from All Public Places

753 words - 4 pages second-hand smoking. There should be a nationwide ban for public smoking, except for in designated smoking areas. That does not eliminate second-hand smoke, but it does minimize the area to which it effects. Works Cited Nordqvist, Christian. "Why Is Smoking Bad For You?." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 3 Mar. 2011. Web.3 Aug. 2013. http

Should Smoking Be Banned From Public Places? What Are The Effects Of Smoking? Do We Have The Right To Ban Smoking In Public Places, Taking Into Consideration The Morals And Ethics

1260 words - 6 pages premature killer in some countries. In Spain, for every 1,000 deaths, 1 is from drugs, 2 are from AIDS, 20 are from motor accidents and 135 are from smoking. 1 in 4 people who smoke die because of it and 50 people in 1 day die because of smoke-related diseases. Estimates show that tobacco will become the biggest killer by 2030. By then, cigarettes will be killing 10 million people a year if the current trend continues and 70% of them will be attributed by people in developing countries. In all, I think that smoking should be banned in public places because I can't see why something that could save so many lives by changing a simple rule is permitted.

Smoking in Public Spaces Should be Banned

2100 words - 8 pages ? Retrieved March 5, 2003 from http://www.nightimeuk.com/polls/smoking.php Rockwell, Llewellynn H. (2001, August 24). Research Fails to Justify Smoking Ban in Restaurants? The United Pro Choice Smokers Rights Newsletter. Issue #134. Should Smoking be Banned in Public Places? (2002, Nov. 11). Retrieved March 5, 2003 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/2409327.stm Shrestha, Hom L. (2001, July 15). Smoking Second Hand. The Weekly Magazine of the Kathmandu Post. Siepmann, James P. (1999, Nov) Smoking Does Not Cause Lung Cancer. Journal of Theoretics.

Smoking should be banned from all Public Areas

1287 words - 6 pages Do you smell that? That foul scent mixed into the air. It’s killing you slowly inside, each time you take a breath of this putrid, polluted, dirty scent. You smell it too, the trillions of chemicals racing into your lungs. Now look around yourself, and you’ll see someone smoking on the bench beside you. Smoking is the number one avoidable causes of death. Therefore, smoking should be banned from all public areas. The ban from smoking in public

Ban on Smoking-Why Smoking should be Banned!

887 words - 4 pages treat. Cigarette smoking is also highly addictive, which makes it continuously prevalent in society. Addiction makes it very difficult for those who start smoking cigarettes to stop, and is a constant worry and annoyance to those around the smoker. Being exposed to cigarette smoke can cause many of the same illnesses that smokers suffer from, which can result in the death of those who don't smoke. Consequently, cigarettes should be banned because

Smoking In Public Places - The Smoking Ban Backlash

1678 words - 7 pages smoke with a cocktail at a bar. In May of 2003, Boston joined 90 other communities that banned smoking in Massachusetts, prohibiting smoking in all public establishments. There are certain exceptions to the smoking ban such as lodge halls, nursing homes, and businesses that obtain most of their revenue in the sales of cigars and cigarettes. The ban has benefited the non-smoking customers of the Boston area, but many heated debates have ensued

Nationwide Indoor Smoking Ban

1019 words - 5 pages various hospitals will also go down. This will allow the available health resources to be redirected to treating other inevitable complications (Phend 1). In conclusion, banning indoor smoking is likely to bring many benefits to everyone, including the reduction in smoking related heart attacks and other health complications. For that reason, people should agree with the nationwide indoor smoking ban. People who are opposed to nationwide indoor

Smoking Should Be Banned

1012 words - 5 pages Agreement in 1998 the TV adds for cigarette companies were banned. Smoking is a detrimental practice, which even though is carried out by individuals of their own accord, affects the surroundings and thus should be banned. Ever since people started smoking researchers had been searching for its adverse effects to the human body. Fritz Lickint, in 1929 presented formal statistical evidence that cigarette smoking leads to lung cancer. This

Similar Essays

Smoking Should Be Banned In All Public Places

1315 words - 5 pages Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet. Tobacco is the substance that is in these cigarettes. These tobacco products are promoted through tobacco ads that are found almost everywhere you turn. They

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places

875 words - 4 pages cigarette butt that does not go out. Secondly, smoking is not good for the environment. When the cigarette is burnt, it will produce much carbon monoxide. When it combines with ozone, which is produced by a chemical reaction in the air between pollution and sunlight, and other chemical, such as nitrogen dioxide and so. It will produce much poisoned gas, which affects environment seriously. In fact, smoking not only kills the smoker, hazards innocent non-smokers, but also ruins the natural ecosystem and environment. Therefore, it is no doubt that smoking should be banned in public places in order to protect all people and environment.

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places?

755 words - 4 pages assembly passed a bill that would ban smoking at all public parks and benches” this, they hope will build a beneficial for environment for everyone in the the community, even the smokers. Smoking ban creates area of shame for smokers, is an article by Jeffrey Gentry, a journalist and reporter for The News Journal. Gentry writes “if you’re a smoker in Rehoboth Beach… smoking also will be banned there Thursday” In Rehoboth Beach the resorts towns ban

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places In Ontario?

1182 words - 5 pages the bodies major functions. In conclusion, theOntario government should ban smoking in public places because it harms peopleshealth. Citizens should be aware that cigarettes pose only pose as a threat to the health ofboth smokers and nonsmokers. Since cigarettes are the leading cause of preventabledeath, people can try to avoid all the harm smoking can do, and in due course, death.People's lifestyles can be affected negatively because of smoking