This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Native American Perspective On Indian Removal Act

958 words - 4 pages

In May 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act which forced Native American tribes to move west. Some Indians left swiftly, while others were forced to to leave by the United States Army. Some were even taken away in chains. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, strongly reinforced this act. In the Second State of the Union Address, Jackson advocated his Indian Policy. There was controversy as to whether the removal of the Native Americans was justified under the administration of President Andrew Jackson. In my personal opinion, as a Native American, the removal of the tribes was not in any way justified.

The removal of the Native Americans was an egocentric move on Jackson’s part. Jackson was only able to see how our removal would benefit the government but was not concerned at all about our values and culture. “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the Indians” (91). This statement, included in the State of the Union Address, exhibits how Jackson was quick to place blame on the Indians. He was basically saying that if there were any disputes between the general and state governments, it would be because of the Indian’s choice to not leave the land. Jackson was attempting to hold the Indians accountable for a matter that they had no say in. It is evident that Jackson could have are less about the Indian’s home land, where we were birthed and raised our kids. It is clear that the sentimental value of the land did not concern Jackson at all. Jackson felt that he offered us an equitable exchange, but his family was not the one being forcefully removed from their birthland to go to an unfamiliar land. “What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive republic, studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms, embellished with all the improvements which art can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than twelve million happy people, and filled with all the blessings of liberty, civilization, and religion” (93). Jackson felt the removal of the Cherokees from our land was justified because the government was paying for everything. Money can not compensate for the blood that was shed by our ancestors.

When some Indian tribes did not leave the land, federal troops came to Georgia to remove the tribes forcibly. Cherokees resisted leaving their land until the bitter finish. Cherokees were marched by gunpoint which was known as the infamous Trail of Tears. Many died due to the horrid conditions, including my great grandmother. Any sensible person would have considered the consequences of these actions. Jackson tried to make the trade seem peaceful and reasonable, but there is nothing sane about...

Find Another Essay On Native American Perspective on Indian Removal Act

The Indian Removal Act Essay

762 words - 3 pages Indian Removal Act In 1830, the Jackson administration instated the Indian Removal Act. This act removed the Native Americans from their ancestral lands to make way for an increase of additional American immigrants. This act forced many Native American tribes from their homes including five larger tribes, Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creek, and Seminole. These tribes had populations were estimated to be around 65,000 people strong that

History: The Indian Removal Act Essay

1260 words - 5 pages ” (Ellis 6). The white Americans were hungry for land and gold. They also did not like the Native Americans. They thought that they were ruthless. Because of this, they wanted the Indians to move away. Using the Indian Removal Act, President Jackson finally was able to get rid of the Native tribes. The Indian Removal was an important part of our nation’s history.   Works Cited Agnew, Brad. Fort Gibson: Terminal on the Trail of Tears. Norman

Andrew Jackson and The Indian Removal Act

1591 words - 6 pages president. Jackson’s opponents saw him to be unconstitutional in his politics because of the Second Bank of the United States, but specifically because of the Indian Removal Act. In the 1800’s America was expanding promptly, it was growing into the south which was the home to many Native American tribes. The tribes that were settled there were the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw, and the Seminole nations (Indian Removal Act). Many Americans

The Indian Removal Act and Louisiana Purchase

702 words - 3 pages . The Indian Removal Act was a harsh and cruel way of life. Even though the Native Americans went through many hardships and struggle they are still strong and thriving as they would before. Today there are indian reservations where many remaining American natives live protected and safe.(according to the History textbook). This is some and many reasons why I decided to do my essay about the Indian Removal Act and the Louisiana Purchase because it means alot to this country and a lot to me.

The Indian Removal Act of 1830: Corrupt from the Outset

1805 words - 8 pages Native American advancement and development, Jackson and his allies would continue to hold the view that inherent racial superiority granted whites access to Indian land. Northerners however protested the obviously thinly veiled land grab; Senator Theodore Frelinghuysen would embody this view when he said, “Do the obligations of justice change with the color of skin?” (Watson 109) Southern proponents of Indian removal were quick to respond

The End Of A Way of Live; the Indian Removal Act of 1830

961 words - 4 pages The defining moment when all the native American Indians were now no longer eligible to stay in their homes the act known as the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This policy was the decision of not only the new North American people but that of the seventh president Andrew Jackson. This White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) president was the last barrier standing between the Native American Lands and New Americans, who would receive land when the

Mississippi History: Indian Removal Act, 13th Amendment, and Reverend George Lee

718 words - 3 pages Mississippi History. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. The act authorized him to negotiate with the Native Americans in the Southern Non- Native Americans supported the act heavily. Christian missionaries opposed this act was future President Abraham Lincoln, future New Jersey Theodore Frelinghuysen and Congressman Davy Crockett spoke against the legislation. It later was passed by


691 words - 3 pages ; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Therefore, if that’s a religion, Americans should not interfere with Indian’s land. Based on all the evidence shown above, the Indian Removal Act was unjustifiable, Jackson’s false promises and Indians being victims of racism. It all was unjust, Indians did not deserve that kind of treatment, that was their land and they were there before

Sports Mascots Honor the Native American Indian

1990 words - 8 pages overwhelming number of people claim that although American Indian mascots may not be intended in a slanderous manner, they represent an unwanted stereotype.  In her article on this subject, Shadow Hawk, an undergraduate in Native American studies at an undisclosed university, states that these mascots depict American Indians as "a downtrodden, beaten people, unable to care for themselves and living in a static culture" (Hawk).  She offers little

The Holocaust and Native American Removal: Acts of Rebellion, Social Issues, and Methods of Removal

883 words - 4 pages their oppressed and the prison-like waiting areas before deportation. They are different in the groups targeted, their leaders, and their views on inter-racial and cultural beliefs. The Holocaust and Indian Removal are very similar in their rebellions. These actions were planned, often by groups among the oppressed. For example, a group of Native Americans called the Red Sticks rebelled and attacked Fort Mims in 1813. They were successful in the

American Indian Religious Freedom Act Of 1978

2873 words - 11 pages lobby for a bill to be passed that would protect Native religious rights. In response, Senator James Abourezk unveiled his American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 into the Senate on December 15, 1977.Corroborations from Indians as well as Hawaiians upon religious suppression generated Senate support for the bill to be passed. In the Senate hearings, Justice Department spokesman Larry Simms presented two elements of concern from the

Similar Essays

The Impact Of The Indian Removal Act On Eastern Native American Tribes

2289 words - 9 pages authority to move consenting eastern Native American tribes west of the Mississippi River. It has been debated whether the Indian Removal Act benefitted or harmed the welfare of Native Americans, and it can be argued that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 had an extremely negative impact on the eastern Native American tribes that relocated west of the Mississippi River. President Jackson abused the rights provided to Native Americans under the act, which

The Indian Removal Act Essay

859 words - 4 pages Congress 'On Indian Removal' (1830). Retrieved from Our Documents: Weiser, K. (2014, February 7). Native American legends: Indian removal act of 1830. Retrieved from Legends of America:

The Indian Removal Act Essay

678 words - 3 pages The Indian Removal Act Within a year of taking office, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act on May 28, 1830. A longtime supporter of removing Indians from the lands they occupied, Jackson’s Indian Removal Act gave him the authority to negotiate directly with Native American Indian tribes to exchange their land with land west of the Mississippi River. Within ten years of the signing of the Act more than 70,000 Indians were

The Indian Removal Act Essay

3619 words - 14 pages and without blankets on their way to the Bayonet Point where they were imprisoned. With no home or personal possessions, they were forced to live and were treated like animals. In relation to the Indian Removal Act of 1830, human rights of Native Americans were violated. They were not treated as human beings and their cause had been devalued because of their race and lifestyles. Jackson mentions them as 'savages'(Document E) in his first annual