This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nature Vs. Nurture Debate Essay

1139 words - 5 pages

Nature vs. Nurture
There is an issue that has been conferred upon by philosophers in the past and still so by scientists today. This issue is whether heredity or environment plays a greater role in the determining or shaping of an individual's behavior. It is known as the nature versus nurture debate.
Numerous generations before us have deliberated on the reasons behind the development of human behavior. There have been many theories formulated to explain why humans behave the way they do. The surviving theories for behavior derive from physiological and sociological explanations. However, the two explanations have not always been compatible with each other. The famous nature vs. nurture debate over human behavior resulted from conflicting views between proponents of the physiological (nature) and sociological (nurture) explanations. Throughout history, research has swayed popularity back and forth between the theories. Yet, theorists have broken down the line separating nature and nurture. As of today, people utilize both explanations to explore human behavior.
Way before our time, early philosophers endeavored to understand the human behavior. As early as 350 BC, such philosophers as Plato and Aristotle tried to understand behavior. The question of nature or nurture as the primary drive can be traced to these times. Plato believed behavior and knowledge was due to innate factors. Author Fiona Cowie states, "The claim that the character of our mental furniture is to a large extent internally rather than environmentally determined found its first substantive defense in the works of Plato..." (Cowie, 1999). Plato theorized that all knowledge is present at birth. Plato also believed that the environment played a part in human processes, but he thought it had an unique role. He believed the environment did not teach people anything new, but its purpose was to remind people of information they already knew (Cowie, 1999). Although Plato's views are not supported today, he laid the groundwork for other researchers to follow.
Alternatively, philosopher Aristotle theorized a different idea about human behavior. He presented the idea that humans are born into the world with a "blank slate" and people's behavior and thoughts are due to experience (Ashcraft, 1998). Unlike Plato, Aristotle hypothesized that humans were not born with knowledge, but they acquire it through experience (Ashcraft, 1998). Aristotle's idea of the tabula rasa is not believed today. Nevertheless, his belief that the environment was a vital factor in behavior influenced many empiricists throughout history.
During the late 1700s, the nature vs. nurture debate began to heat up between philosophers. Internalists (nature) and empiricists (nurture) wrote literature back and forth trying to prove their beliefs and disprove the other theories. Two philosophers, G.W. Leibniz and John Locke, were the main representatives of their respected explanations. Leibniz promoted the externalism point...

Find Another Essay On Nature vs. Nurture Debate

Nature vs. Nurture; The Great Debate by: Dane Sanderson

615 words - 2 pages , would it be because somewhere in his genetic makeup he should naturally be afraid? Or, is it from learning from his peers to be afraid? Nature vs. nurture is a theory among others today, and among the controversy shows some truth. bibliography: http://google.com-Marie Baxter

The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Learning More about Alcoholism

3398 words - 14 pages The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Learning More about Alcoholism INTRODUCTION: Alcoholism can affect anyone. It has enormous costs as it pertains to societies, families, and individuals. It is not prejudicial towards any race, color, sex, religion, or economic level. Although we do have ideas as to what alcoholism is, what we do not know is the exact cause(s) of this problem. Researchers are continually seeking answers to the long

The Nature Versus Nurture Debate

859 words - 3 pages versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development.” - (Kendra Cherry). So far the evidence collected from years of research and data suggests a resolution of equal importance between the two factors as fifty/fifty. In the debate of nature v nurture there are people who take the position that all or most

The Nature VS. Nurture debate. A view on various pros and cons. With Bibliography

1832 words - 7 pages humans behave the way they do. The surviving theories for behavior derive from physiological and sociological explanations. However, the two explanations have not always been compatible with each other. The famous nature vs. nurture debate over human behavior resulted from conflicting views between proponents of the physiological (nature) and sociological (nurture) explanations. Throughout history, research has swayed popularity back and forth

Psychological debate of Nature versus Nurture

620 words - 2 pages , they are more likely to growing up differently because of the different influences on them.Other more mundane factor, such as crime, can also be part of the nature vs. nurture debate. Some children who are bullies in preschool will most likely continue to bully later in life. This is an example of how children possess temperaments that determines their behavior. When children are young, they haven't fully developed their sense of logic or morality

Nature versus Nurture Debate in Violence, Environment and Other Aspects

779 words - 4 pages Scientists and biologist have argued the Nature versus Nurture debate for decades. This debate is about the degree to which our environment and heredity, affects our behavior and developmental stages. According to this debate, nature can be described as, the behavior of a person is occurring because of their genetic makeup. Since the behavior of a person is due to their genetic makeup, then, it (nature) should also influence a person’s growth

nature versus nurture debate

629 words - 3 pages B.S. in WILDLIFE ECOLOGY (total credit requirement = 121-123) Name: ID #: Concentration/Minor ___________________________________________ First Year Fall Semester First Year Spring Semester BIO 100 Basic Biology/Lab 4 BIO 200 Biology of Organisms/Lab 4 ENG 101 College Composition 3 CMJ 103 Fund. of Public Communication 3 MAT 122 or Pre-Calculus or ECO 100 or Introduction to Economics or MAT 126 Calculus 4 ECO 120 Principles of Microeconomics 3

The Formula for Fruition: The Age Old Debate of Nature Versus Nurture by Kendra Cherry

1887 words - 8 pages that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our experience.” (Cherry) . Over time, with more research, it seems to be that nature and nurture work together to form who a person is, but when it comes to intelligence, scientists still debate which of the two may be a more powerful determinant. When I realized just how many aspects of life “nature vs. nurture” applies to, I decided to narrow my search down to how it affects your

nature vs nurture

1303 words - 5 pages ://psychology.about.com/od/nindex/g/nature-nurture.htmDodge, K. A. (2009, December). The Nature-Nurture Debate and Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790282/FERRY, V. P. (2012). Are You Born Funny?? - SiOWfa12: Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/afr3/blogs/siowfa12/2012/10/are-you-born-funny.htmlGladwell, M. (2014). Quotes About Nature Vs Nurture (9 quotes

Nature vs Nurture

581 words - 2 pages Nature vs Nurture The issues pitting nature against nurture are exceptionally significant for the gamut of discoveries that attribute an increasing proportion of traits and behaviours to one's genetic makeup. The resulting variety of physical shortcomings and limitations in each person has, for centuries, been countered by endeavours to improve or interfere where necessary, and every individual is consequently the product of a delicate

Nature Vs Nurture

773 words - 4 pages When it comes to the debate of Nature vs. Nurture I consider myself to be the middle man. I feel that our behavior, physical development and our identity is not only the result of our genealogical makeup but our interactions, and decisions that we encounter on a daily basis as well as our family structure. First I would like to give a brief summary of the two topics. The nature side of the debate expresses that our decisions and end results are

Similar Essays

The Nature Vs. Nurture Debate Essay

1757 words - 7 pages The Nature vs. Nurture Debate No change in circumstances can repair a defect of character. Ralph Waldo Emerson One of the great controversial debates in Psychology is determining if characteristics and behavior are primarily due to genetics or the environment. We can now readily accept that genes determine our eye color, height, blood type, and other biological factors. Do these same genes that determine anatomy also determine our

The Nature Nurture Debate Essay

1695 words - 7 pages How the Pendulum Swings: The Nature-Nurture Debate One of the most intriguing science-and-culture debates of the twentieth century is that of the origin of behavior. The issue that has its roots in biology and psychology is popularly framed as the "nature versus nurture" debate. At different points in time, consensus has swung from one to the other as the supposed cause of our actions. These changes are not only the result of an

Nature Versus Nurture Debate Essay

1052 words - 4 pages Genes or life experiences? What determines who you truly are? The nature versus nurture debate is one of the most popular debates throughout history. It questions whether genetics are the thing that decide who you are, or whether it is the life experiences that influence your characteristics and qualities. Did you gain that good humour from your mother? Or is it simply there due to the influences in the environment you grew up in? A rather vast

The Nature/Nurture Debate Essay

794 words - 3 pages genes and the environment steps in. As with all of these 'nature-nurture' discussions, this 50-50 percentage is not concrete. There's no way to tease apart the contributions of heredity vs. environment for any given trait. First, there's no way something can be affected by just "heredity" or just "environment" -- you must consider a third, unique source of variance, the dynamic interaction of heredity X environment. Second, for each