This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nature Vs. Nurture In The Novel Frankenstein

2205 words - 9 pages

Does one enter the world evil or does one become malicious gradually because of life experiences? Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is a fiction story about the scientist Victor Frankenstein and his destructive creation of a monster that ruins his life. The monster that Victor creates is born good but corrupted by the world. As the world, in fear, continually rejects the monster, he quickly transitions from a being who was good to an evil one. Reading the novel, the science of human behavior comes into question. In the novel Frankenstein, the author Mary Shelley uses the monster’s constant rejection from society to show that a person’s traits are effected more by his environment than by his nature.
The idea of nature vs. nurture comes into play in the novel. The monster’s environment nurtured him into a malicious being from an originally good one. According to the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, “Nature, which may be defined in terms of inheritance, biological background, and genetic makeup, must be taken into account, along with nurture, which may be defined in terms of experience and learning.” The debate is whether a persons innate qualities or their personal experiences make up individual differences. We are aware that physical characteristics are genetic, but many physiologists differ on the idea if who we are is entirely hereditary. There is a term, “tabula rasa, meaning a blank slate” that comes from the empiricists approach to psychology, it is the idea that we are born with a blank slate and our experiences shape them. When the monster is first created we see that he started with a blank, good slate, not knowing anything about the world. As he increases his knowledge, he begins to realize how much of an outcast he really is, as something different and evil.
****if need add paragraph on article
The creature is born kind. It is nurture, or lack thereof, that made him malicious. The monster is first seen as good because he loves humanity and even helps people in some cases. **** help girl As the creature discovered more about the world, he had difficulty understanding the evil of it. If the monster had been treated kindly by humans than the story could have gone a little differently. In an article on Nature versus nurture there is an example, “certain individuals might have the genetic potential to be anywhere from 5 feet 6 inches to 5 feet 11 inches tall, but their experience (for example, exercise, nutrition) determines the height within that range to which they eventually grow.” (*****)If you took this example and compared it to the creatures experiences, you would find that it is possible that he could have lived a simple, nice life. Due to his hideous features, his rejection cause him to become revengeful. He did not “grow” to be who he could have been because his encounters changed him.
How can someone become good with no one to teach or support them? The monster was a good being and after being outcast...

Find Another Essay On Nature Vs. Nurture In the Novel Frankenstein

What makes a monster nature vs nurture in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein

840 words - 4 pages For nearly 2 centuries Mary Shelleys Frankenstein has been considered by many to be the ultimate human vs monster conflict. However what makes someone a “monster”? Appearance? Character traits? Since the creature was born as an outsider humans neglected him and he becomes malicious. In the beginning an overly ambitious victor creates an imperfect creature. Since he is neglected by his creator as he is born an outsider he faces societies shunning

Nature vs. Nurture (Genesis and Mary Shelleys Frankenstein)

1835 words - 7 pages everyone is born evil and that through the right kind of nurture evil does not have to be present in ones life.The book of Genesis argues that everyone is bound to be evil from youth, but Mary Shelley argues the idea that not everyone is inherently evil with the story of Frankenstein. Through the lives of Victor, The Creation and Justine Moritz it is explicitly shown that evil comes from life experiences rather then naturally. Mary Shelley creates this theme of nature vs. nurture in order to show that being an evil person is not mandatory and we can escape evil by surrounding ourselves with good people and circumstances.

Nature and Nurture in Frankenstein and Rappaccini's Daughter

2549 words - 10 pages Nature and Nurture in Frankenstein and Rappaccini's Daughter             One of the most popular disputes in the history of philosophy regards whether nurture of a human being plays a more important role in the formation of its character than the genetic heritage that it bears. As a natural result, the dispute echoes in many literary works, not always directly, but sometimes taking the form of a pretext or a motif in a larger context

Nature vs. Nurture in Sport

1423 words - 6 pages What makes a good athlete? What separates a person on the 1st line up from a bench warmer? Where does athleticism come from? Is it from our genes, or is it a product of the environment we live in? These are the types of questions that arise in the nature vs. nurture debate pertaining about athletic ability. In 1582, British educator, Richard Mulcaster wrote that
''Nature makes the boy toward, nurture sees him forward,'' he gave the world
a

The Nature vs. Nurture Debate

1757 words - 7 pages The Nature vs. Nurture Debate No change in circumstances can repair a defect of character. Ralph Waldo Emerson One of the great controversial debates in Psychology is determining if characteristics and behavior are primarily due to genetics or the environment. We can now readily accept that genes determine our eye color, height, blood type, and other biological factors. Do these same genes that determine anatomy also determine our

Nature vs. Nurture in "Cry ,the beloved Country"

740 words - 3 pages Psychologists often battle on the idea of 'Nature vs. Nurture', or the idea that people's character are decided by either genetic inheritance or their surroundings. In Cry, the Beloved Country, two brothers, John and Stephen Kumalo, are shown to have distinctly different values, although they are of the same family. Alan Paton, through his juxtaposition of John Kumalo and Stephen Kumalo, provides a correlation between a person's environment

The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Learning More about Alcoholism

3398 words - 14 pages The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Learning More about Alcoholism INTRODUCTION: Alcoholism can affect anyone. It has enormous costs as it pertains to societies, families, and individuals. It is not prejudicial towards any race, color, sex, religion, or economic level. Although we do have ideas as to what alcoholism is, what we do not know is the exact cause(s) of this problem. Researchers are continually seeking answers to the long

Nature vs. Nurture in Gender Identity

960 words - 4 pages Matt Pelfini Jonathan Weller San Francisco Stories 13 February 2014 Nature vs Nurture The idea of nature vs nurture when it comes to gender identity is a controversial and highly debated topic. However I feel that one side is supported by science and research, while the other is supported by unproven theories. We are all born with unique DNA, and this DNA is what makes us, us. While our society or environment can influence our views or thoughts

Nature vs. Nurture: Virtues in our Society

1155 words - 5 pages Stephen L. Carter proposes that integrity and honesty among other virtues and morals were unintentionally taught to our society via religious scriptures, nonacademic lessons in public schools, and child rearing methods used by parents are in the “curriculum” of “character education”. Despite the differences of virtues in areas such as sectionalism, prejudice, and racism, "nurture" or rearing of a society with virtues such as honesty and

The Role of Nature vs Nurture

631 words - 3 pages The Role of Nature vs Nurture "We used to think our fate was in our stars. Now, we know, in large part, that our fate is in our genes." ---James Watson While social research has been steady and ongoing, our biological knowledge has advanced disproportionately in recent times. As we discover more about the role of genes in pre-determining who we are, the nature versus nurture debate seems headed for a tilt of the biological over the

Nature vs. Nurture: Leaning Towards the Nurture Theory

2205 words - 9 pages of the two teams put in charge of mapping out the human genome in the Human Genome Project (Davies, 2001). The Human Genome Project discovered that there are roughly three million differences in the genes of two different people. However, only 10,000 of these contribute to any noticeable dissimilarities. Kevin Davie, author of Nature vs. Nurture Revisited, pointed out one personality trait out of many that has not been linked to genetics, the

Similar Essays

Nature Vs. Nurture In Frankenstein Essay

956 words - 4 pages ure vs. Nurture in Frankenstein Andrew Lustig proposed a great question to the readers of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, “How far should we go in out efforts to alter nature, including human nature? As stewards of God’s creation what are our responsibilities?” (Lustig 1) This question results in theme of nature vs. nurture in the novel. The nature vs. nurture debate is an important topic in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein. The two central

Nature Vs Nurture In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

2025 words - 8 pages Philosophers and scientists alike have debated for centuries whether a person’s character is the result of nature or nurture. In the writings of Thomas Hobbes, it is expressed that humans are endowed with character from birth, and that they are innately evil in nature. John Locke’s response to this theory is that everyone is born with a tabula rasa, or blank slate, and then develops character after a series of formative experiences. The idea

Nature Vs. Nurture In Mary Shelly's Frankenstein

1845 words - 7 pages Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a comparison of Nature vs. Nurture. Some critics argue that the Being is a monster from birth, while others claim that it cannot be limited to such a narrow category. The argument lies in the education of the Being. He is not a born killer, but is created by the rejection of society. The Being is born an innocent creature with ability to appreciate the sublime, but after learning about human emotions, he is

Nature Vs. Nurture In Frankenstein By Mary Shelley

1066 words - 5 pages Nature (our genes) and nurture (our environment) affect our individual differences in behavior and personality. In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley addresses the conflict of nature vs. nurture. Victor Frankenstein creates a "child" whom he abandons upon birth. This brings up questions such as, was the creature genetically inclined to be evil, or did the hostility he encountered turn him evil? Are one's surroundings determined by who they