This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nature Vs. Nurture: John Locke On Innate Ideas

1705 words - 7 pages

In book one of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke argues against innate ideas using three arguments. The intention of this paper will be to discuss John Locke’s views on ideas while introducing and explaining his three arguments against innate ideas in detail touching on his idea of tabula rasa. Furthermore, it will briefly discuss alternative views on innate ideas as both conflicting and similar.
John Locke’s writings came at a time when there was a philosophical debate going on between the empiricists and the rationalists. The rationalists believed that true knowledge came through certainty and rationalist philosophers such as Descartes believed in the existence of ideas and knowledge at birth. Meanwhile, the empiricists believed that the senses were pivotal to one’s ability to become cognizant of knowledge of the world. They believed that everything originates with and in experience. Being that he was an empiricists, this was the belief of John Locke.
Locke’s Argument against Innate Ideas
In his essay, Locke gives three propositions for rejecting innate objects. John Locke argued that there are no ideas that are innate ideas in the minds of human beings. He rested his reasoning on three ideas or propositions.They are as follows:
1. There is no universal assent;
2. If innate ideas are through reason, then they are deduced; and
3. If self-evidence is equal to innateness, the consequence of innate ideas end with something absurd (Ariew).
With the first of proposition, that there is no universal assent, Locke believed that in order for there to be an existence of innate ideas, there would have to be those ideas that everyone in the world would have to agree on or assent to. These ideas would be in the mind of everyone throughout the world but this is not the case. He claims that “there is no idea that all men have, and no principle that everyone accepts” (Engel, 230). Locke would continue by saying that children and idiots are the exception to this because they do not have any of these concepts formed and therefore cannot be born with them. The rationalists would retort by stating that they [children and idiots] are in fact born with ideas but that they just have not become aware of it because they are not yet at the age in which they are able to reason which is where Locke’s second proposition comes in (Engel, 230).
The second of Locke’s propositions for rejecting innate ideas is that if innate ideas are through reason, then they are deduced. This is the belief that it is not possible for there to be ideas in the mind that one is not aware of. Rationalists argued that once children grew up and developed mentally, they would be able to understand the innate ideas. For Locke, the idea that they have to be able to reason to understand and ideas that are supposed to be innate shows and strengthens his argument. This would, however, have to be based on the notion that innate ideas were conscious ideas. On the other...

Find Another Essay On Nature vs. Nurture: John Locke on Innate Ideas

nature vs nurture Essay

751 words - 4 pages One of the oldest controversy in psychology is nature vs. nurture. The whole debate boils down to genetic inheritance or environmental factors when it comes to human development. Philosopher Plato believed that certain behaviors are inborn or in others words occur naturally regardless of environmental factors. Then there are other philosopher such as John Locke who believe that the mind begins as a blank slate. So everything we come in

Nature Vs. Nurture Controversy Essay

598 words - 2 pages experiences that happen around us then genes that we are born with. One of the first people to argue this debate was British philosopher John Locke. His belief was that the human infant is born without knowledge or skills and that experience, in the form of human learning, etches messages on the blank tablet of the infant's unformed mind. Locke believed that humans develop by the stimulation that people receive as they are nurtured by experience

nature vs nurture

1303 words - 5 pages siblings. John B. Watson proved that children's behavior or reaction could be conditioned. Showing that it's based on the environment and the influence it has on children and not genetics.In reflection to these articles, my hypothesis is that nurture has the greatest impact on a child. All of the articles were about nature versus nurture, your physical features can be identified as identical to your parents, like having the same eye color as your father

Nature vs Nurture

581 words - 2 pages Nature vs Nurture The issues pitting nature against nurture are exceptionally significant for the gamut of discoveries that attribute an increasing proportion of traits and behaviours to one's genetic makeup. The resulting variety of physical shortcomings and limitations in each person has, for centuries, been countered by endeavours to improve or interfere where necessary, and every individual is consequently the product of a delicate

Nature vs. Nurture

1389 words - 6 pages There is a gift, something inborn, that separates those with simply just skill and those with exceptional talent. One of the popular debates concerning "nature vs. nurture" is that of which whether or not people are born with natural artistic talent or is it something that has to be developed. This paper will prove that exceptional talent that stands out from all others is that of which one is born with. Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by

Nature vs. Nurture Essay

2089 words - 8 pages Nature vs. Nurture      Throughout the history of human existence, there have always been questions that have plagued man for centuries. Some of these questions are “what is the meaning of life” and “which came first, the chicken or the egg”. Within the past 400 years a new question has surfaced which takes our minds to much further levels. The question asked is whether nature or nurture has more of an impact on the growing development of

Nature vs. Nurture

1007 words - 5 pages “Some findings, assuming they can be repeated, will not satisfy gay groups who want homosexuality to be seen as purely a genetic trait. Nor will they please commentators who see homosexuality as a choice made by "sinful" people. What they do show is human sexual behavior in all its splendid complexity.” (inspire.in.gov) Nature vs. Nurture is the debate on whether or not an individual is born homosexual or is homosexual based on who they are

Nature Vs Nurture

1531 words - 7 pages When we born, we all are like a blank slate (Uzgalis). Then, why are we the way we are? The answer will lead us to consider the decades of debate, nature vs nurture. Nature vs nurture debate discusses the importance of an individual's innate traits compared to his personal experiences in shaping his behavior and personality. Nature is heredity or genes that we get from our parents and nurture is our environment. We cannot ignore; we share the

Nature Vs Nurture

773 words - 4 pages When it comes to the debate of Nature vs. Nurture I consider myself to be the middle man. I feel that our behavior, physical development and our identity is not only the result of our genealogical makeup but our interactions, and decisions that we encounter on a daily basis as well as our family structure. First I would like to give a brief summary of the two topics. The nature side of the debate expresses that our decisions and end results are

Nature Vs Nurture

1513 words - 6 pages our nurture. They claim that we are all born with a clean slate and that we are all equal. I believe that there is some mixture of the two. Some characteristics come from our nature aspect and some from our nurture.         Our innate characteristics are our genetics. Which are from our gene pool, solely from our parents. Having nothing to do, whatsoever, with our natural environment. Obviously, this is including our physical traits

Nature vs. Nurture

657 words - 3 pages seems to be part of the controversy over the subject. Also, these questions play a factor in how to change and adapt behavior. Different techniques would be more effective depending on the cause of a particular behavior or characteristic. When analyzing the causes of behavior problems in children the question of nature vs. nurture is a legitimate question. One recent study conducted by the University of Virginia and several others including one in

Similar Essays

Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And John Locke: Human Nature

1546 words - 6 pages out war. In contrast to Hobbes’ pessimistic outlook, Locke places trust in the goodness of human nature. “This equality of men by nature . . . [obligates] mutual love amongst men, on which he builds the duties they owe one another . . . the great maxims of justice and charity” (Locke 8). While Hobbesian equality turns men against each another in the pursuit of similar desires, Locke’s state of equality encourages charity. Locke believes human

Nature Vs. Nurture Debate Essay

1139 words - 5 pages philosophers. Internalists (nature) and empiricists (nurture) wrote literature back and forth trying to prove their beliefs and disprove the other theories. Two philosophers, G.W. Leibniz and John Locke, were the main representatives of their respected explanations. Leibniz promoted the externalism point of view. Cowie states, "...Leibniz's position on this issue is, of course, that the tabula is far from rasa: 'The soul inherently contains the sources

Nature Vs. Nurture Essay

823 words - 4 pages open to examination that is more philosophical. While humans have always explored their own nature and have certainly done much since the onset of Greek philosophy, modern positions on the issue of nature and nurture can be traced to the works of two English philosophers, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Locke was the founder of the school known as empiricism, holding that knowledge can be gained only through the use of the senses, as opposed to

Nature Vs. Nurture Essay

1252 words - 5 pages Nature vs Nurture      For the past five weeks we have studied three different but influential people in our perspective on human nature class. They are Freud, Plato and Tzu. The main discussion between all of them is nature versus nurture. I will discuss the difference between nature and nurture and then I’ll apply to each of these philosophers and how they react to it.      When looked up in the dictionary the term nature means the