This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nature Vs. Nurture: Parents Or Environment

663 words - 3 pages

Whether raised by parents properly or heavily influenced by the environment, many people debate whether an individual is mostly influenced by genetics or influenced by their environment. A person’s environment can have multiple influences, but the genes passed down by parents play a huge role in developing how their offspring will turn out to be. Being unable to properly test whether certain characteristics of a person come from genetics or the influences of the environment makes this theory very difficult to understand, thus making the topic of nature vs. nurture extremely controversial. The debates always show that nature and nurture contrast but then there may be evidence that suggest that the two are linked and a person is actually an enigma characterized by the mixture of predisposed genetics and environmental influences. The idea that nature and nurture are joined is great to oppose nativists, people on the nature side, and empiricists, people sided ...view middle of the document...

Possible audiences might include nativists and empiricists. I conclude that because they are on opposite sides of the spectrum and the article serves as a way to arbitrate the different opinions people have. I feel like this article had some biases, his sources were sketchy and he was very vague on some parts of the article where he talks about schizophrenia. The evidence somewhat support what he was trying to mention but he went on a tangent and menially focused on nature via nurture.

With a classic subtopic of Nature vs. Nurture, Shanawaz describes language and how we learn to speak. The author is trying to persuade that we acquire a lot of our language by our environment as well as our genetics but the environment has a greater impact. The intended audiences once again are empiricists and nativists because the article has a special focus on those groups explaining rationale on why both of those groups can be correct regarding how a human develops language. The author emphasizes the big overarching debate of nature and nurture in the linguistic section including LAD (language acquisition device) and UG (Universal Grammar). I don’t think that there was any bias because it seemed that the author listed solid facts that are credible. The evidence does support the main points because he stated a lot of facts and use resources of psychologists like Chomsky.

McLeod explains the information really well in this article and it is a very simple red. He focuses on the debate at its simplest form. And the author is trying to provide basic information about nature and nurture to the audience and the audience can be anyone who is generally interested in psychology or anyone who wants an informational read. The author intends to clearly and simply explain the great debate that has created a lot of controversy. The author doesn’t really emphasize a lot, he keeps it simple and consistent. I believe that there are no biases because he mentioned specific facts and cited psychologists. Omissions were present but that’s probably because it’s a general broad topic and it does not go into specific cases of nature vs. nurture. I believe that the evidence does support his main points because the evidence were facts from reliable psychologists.

Find Another Essay On Nature vs. Nurture: Parents or Environment

Nature vs Nurture: Genetics vs Environment

999 words - 4 pages as nurture which leads me to believe that nurture may be a bit more important Conclusion Clearly it can be seen that both genetic factors and the environment can influence the intelligence in humans through the studies. In other words, every person in this world has their own unique personality and behavior. I guess the question to ask is if everyone decisions are guided by either hereditary propensity or their past experiences nature or nurture

Nature vs Nurture: Genes vs Environment

1117 words - 4 pages In trying to understand human behavior, professionals for centuries have looked at the nature vs. nurture theory. While it is known that the physical traits such of eye or hair color have to do with nature, some strongly believe that genes play a part in the way we behave such as in personality and intelligence and others believe that we behave a certain way solely due to our environment. Professor Jerome Kagan, from Harvard opened up a brand

Genes vs. Environment (This essay is about nature vs. nurture)

1233 words - 5 pages I generally regard myself as a disorganized person. I believe this is an innate trait for me. As far as I can remember, I've always been disorganized. But throughout my life, I developed some ways to cope with it, especially after having some negative experiences. So what was the main factor that made me disorganized person? I strongly believe that it was a combination of both nature and nurture, but if I had to choose one, I would have to say

Nature versus Nurture Debate in Violence, Environment and Other Aspects

779 words - 4 pages Scientists and biologist have argued the Nature versus Nurture debate for decades. This debate is about the degree to which our environment and heredity, affects our behavior and developmental stages. According to this debate, nature can be described as, the behavior of a person is occurring because of their genetic makeup. Since the behavior of a person is due to their genetic makeup, then, it (nature) should also influence a person’s growth

"Men vs. Men Women: Nature or Nurture"

541 words - 2 pages It's amazing how men ad women can be considered the same but yet be so very different. On the outside they may look alike- two eyes, two ears, a nose, mouth, hands, and so on, but they could not be more different. So the saying goes, "men are from Mars and women are from Venus". The question is why though? Is it because of nature or because of nurture?One difference is that men are extremely more aggressive than women due to higher testosterone

nature vs nurture

1303 words - 5 pages and the hair color as your mom. Nonetheless, a child's personality and talents may not be the same as the parents. The environment that a child grows up in has long lasting influence on the way they behave and respond to the things around them. A child develops in the context of family, friends, community, society and public policies.ReferencesCherry, K. (2014). Nature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Retrieved from http

Nature vs. Nurture Essay

1252 words - 5 pages Nature vs Nurture      For the past five weeks we have studied three different but influential people in our perspective on human nature class. They are Freud, Plato and Tzu. The main discussion between all of them is nature versus nurture. I will discuss the difference between nature and nurture and then I’ll apply to each of these philosophers and how they react to it.      When looked up in the dictionary the term nature means the

nature vs nurture

751 words - 4 pages affects who you are is how you were brought up by your parents. Another example of environmental factor that helps influence behavior is the way you speak, you learn tone, speak, and sound from the people around you as a child. (Knowlton, 2005) Studies. The first study I found on Nature vs. Nurture was the Swedish Twin study of child and adolescent development otherwise known as TCHAD. It was a longitudinal study about how genes and environment can

Nature vs. Nurture Debate

1139 words - 5 pages Nature vs. Nurture There is an issue that has been conferred upon by philosophers in the past and still so by scientists today. This issue is whether heredity or environment plays a greater role in the determining or shaping of an individual's behavior. It is known as the nature versus nurture debate. Numerous generations before us have deliberated on the reasons behind the development of human behavior. There have been many theories formulated

Nature vs. Nurture

1007 words - 5 pages influenced by and the environment they are in or surrounded by. The ‘nature’ side of the nature vs. nurture debate is based on if an individual is born homosexual. The ‘nurture’ side of nature vs. nurture is if an individual is taught, influenced, or is affected someway by the environment and/or place they live in and who they live with. Either way, the individual is still homosexual. How a child acts are the tendencies significantly swayed by genes

Nature Vs Nurture

773 words - 4 pages , do you? No. This is because your physical appearance, although it can be medically altered, is created when your parents DNA are combined together, which is why you can see characteristics from both parents when you do look in the mirror (nature). Now although you may see those characteristics, there is also a side of you that may only be the result of prior actions (nurture). Some of these characteristics may include having muscles or having a

Similar Essays

Nature Vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More?

993 words - 4 pages What makes us who we are? Does the answer lie in our genes, our environment, or in the way we are raised? For years, there has been an on-going debate between nature and nurture. T.H. White, author of The Once and Future King, explores the debate through many of the book’s characters. The issue clearly appears in the relationship of Queen Morgause and her sons, the Orkney brothers. The debate caused people to pick a side, to pick nature over

Nature Vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More?

1286 words - 5 pages individuals to higher risks of contracting some disease. A good example of such diseases is Alzheimer’s disease. In conclusion and with respect to Bryner’s (2006) article, talents, addiction and diseases among others do not entirely depend on genes rather on the environment. It is thus sufficient to assert that environmental factors enhance genes influence on behavior and diseases. In Andrew (1998) in “Nature vs nurture: Are leaders born or made? A

Nature Vs Nurture: Genes Vs Environment

1099 words - 4 pages different than what my upbringing would dictate. I believe, firmly, that we cannot blame our genetic makeup or our parents for our problems as adults and our lifestyle choices are just that, choices. I don’t think that the nature vs. nurture argument can ever be settled in one clear way over the other because they do not dictate our life. We can overcome factors of either of them, by choice and will. Works Cited Bryner, J. (2006) Nature Vs

Nature Vs Nurture: Genes Vs Environment

1473 words - 6 pages person who has two obese parents can grow to be healthy and slender as healthy food is available for him or her. Both nature and nurture plays a very significant role in the psychological and overall development of a child. Physical appearances and traits such as the colour of the hair or the height of an individual are normally acquired from generation to generation through genes. So much so, environment can change the physique of a person in many