Nature Vs. Nurture: Virtues In Our Society

1155 words - 5 pages

Stephen L. Carter proposes that integrity and honesty among other virtues and morals were unintentionally taught to our society via religious scriptures, nonacademic lessons in public schools, and child rearing methods used by parents are in the “curriculum” of “character education”. Despite the differences of virtues in areas such as sectionalism, prejudice, and racism, "nurture" or rearing of a society with virtues such as honesty and integrity is best understood as "monkey-see monkey-do"-the “source of growth in children's cognitive, language, and social skills” (Kessenich, Maureen, et al. "Developmental Theory.").
In various religious scriptures there is a list of virtues and morals one is required to live by. For instance in Christianity, the Bible encompasses the “Ten Commandments” which by definition are “the divine rules of conduct given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai” ( For thousands of years the Ten Commandments were used as a list of such morals and virtues teaching each succeeding generation the importance of honesty, and integrity among others. They are such one example of a religion teaching principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character.
One can say, "Character education is as old as education itself." There is some truth into that statement as teaching character extends into prehistory itself. In Western philosophy, early Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle believed that happiness requires virtue; hence a person who wanted to be happy needed “virtuous amounts of character”. Socrates identifies happiness with pleasure and explains “various virtues as instrumental means to pleasure.” Plato on the other hand expands on Socrates’ theory, by teaching a path to pleasure and by extension virtues “understand what contributes to our overall good and have our spirited and appetitive desires educated properly and guided by the rational part of the soul.” He then goes on to explain that a person young in life should explore various virtuous pleasures and must then wait to later in life why he loves what he loves. The most influential philosopher of early Western civilizations-Aristotle believed in balance, and “moderation in all things.” His teaching recognizes the need to value developing one’s rational powers, and then using this recognition to identify which actions are appropriate in various circumstances. Such ideals heavily influenced the philosophy of politics, literature and education (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
In Eastern philosophy views the nature of man as quiet and calm until tarnished with material desires. When one gives into the desires of “wants” and not the initial “needs” to survive he loses his true self and the prominent principal is destroyed. These ideals seed the main points of Confucianism and Taoism as two of the great religious/philosophical systems in China. An ancient Eastern philosopher, Confucius taught that one...

Find Another Essay On Nature vs. Nurture: Virtues in our Society

Nature vs. Nurture in Gender Identity

960 words - 4 pages Matt Pelfini Jonathan Weller San Francisco Stories 13 February 2014 Nature vs Nurture The idea of nature vs nurture when it comes to gender identity is a controversial and highly debated topic. However I feel that one side is supported by science and research, while the other is supported by unproven theories. We are all born with unique DNA, and this DNA is what makes us, us. While our society or environment can influence our views or thoughts

Nature Vs. Nurture In the Novel Frankenstein

2205 words - 9 pages . Reading the novel, the science of human behavior comes into question. In the novel Frankenstein, the author Mary Shelley uses the monster’s constant rejection from society to show that a person’s traits are effected more by his environment than by his nature. The idea of nature vs. nurture comes into play in the novel. The monster’s environment nurtured him into a malicious being from an originally good one. According to the International

Nature vs Nurture in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

2025 words - 8 pages Philosophers and scientists alike have debated for centuries whether a person’s character is the result of nature or nurture. In the writings of Thomas Hobbes, it is expressed that humans are endowed with character from birth, and that they are innately evil in nature. John Locke’s response to this theory is that everyone is born with a tabula rasa, or blank slate, and then develops character after a series of formative experiences. The idea

Nature vs. Nurture in Mary Shelly's Frankenstein

1845 words - 7 pages Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a comparison of Nature vs. Nurture. Some critics argue that the Being is a monster from birth, while others claim that it cannot be limited to such a narrow category. The argument lies in the education of the Being. He is not a born killer, but is created by the rejection of society. The Being is born an innocent creature with ability to appreciate the sublime, but after learning about human emotions, he is

Nature vs. Nurture Essay

1252 words - 5 pages Nature vs Nurture      For the past five weeks we have studied three different but influential people in our perspective on human nature class. They are Freud, Plato and Tzu. The main discussion between all of them is nature versus nurture. I will discuss the difference between nature and nurture and then I’ll apply to each of these philosophers and how they react to it.      When looked up in the dictionary the term nature means the

nature vs nurture

1303 words - 5 pages and the hair color as your mom. Nonetheless, a child's personality and talents may not be the same as the parents. The environment that a child grows up in has long lasting influence on the way they behave and respond to the things around them. A child develops in the context of family, friends, community, society and public policies.ReferencesCherry, K. (2014). Nature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Retrieved from http

Nature vs. Nurture Debate

1139 words - 5 pages nature vs. nurture debate, which would linger in the fields of philosophy and psychology for decades. A key point should be made that even though the literalists and empiricists felt strongly about their theories, the explanations were not entirely opposite of each other. Cowie explains, "...rhetoric aside, both empiricists and nativists are both internalist and externalists about the origin of what is in our minds" (Cowie, 1999). Even Leibniz

Nature vs. Nurture Essay

2089 words - 8 pages people. It is a fact that a combination of nature and nurture play important roles in how humans behave socially. However, I believe that nature has a more domineering role in the development of how people behave in society with regards to sexual orientation, crimes and violence and mental disorders. Height, hair color, eye color and sex are just a few examples of ways our DNA has shaped us. But could it be possible that our DNA also effects the way

Nature Vs Nurture

773 words - 4 pages , p. 144). Although we cannot rule out DNA when we try to form our identities most people will argue that many teens do not just automatically know who they want to be. They begin to form themselves and create their own person by referring to the actions and identities of the people surrounding them, which leads me to the topic of family structure? Family structure plays a very important role when it is included in the nature vs. nurture debate

Nature vs. Nurture

1007 words - 5 pages . The influence of genes increase as we age which could lead to someone not only being born gay, but being influenced by their environment on whether or not they are homosexual. ( Personality tends to be more influenced by environment than by genes in babyhood which also comes back to the ‘nature side’ of the “Nature vs. Nurture” debate. ( When we are influenced by our environment in nature, we are influenced by family

Nature vs. Nurture

657 words - 3 pages Over recent years the nature vs. nurture debate has been extensively discussed and researched. Should human characteristics such as intelligence, personality, behavior and ability be attributed to our genetics or our environment? One problem with this is how to pin a trait down to either an inherited or learned characteristic, or perhaps it’s both. Are we to blame for our behavior or is inevitable due to our genetics? This question and others

Similar Essays

Nature Vs. Nurture: Does Our Genes Effect Our Personalities?

947 words - 4 pages traits, or are they based solely on how we are raised, and in the experiences we go through? The role of genetics in personality is at the center of the timeless nature vs. nurture debate. When it comes to personality the question is, have our genes determined our fate of who we will be long before we live out our lives, or does our environment, the way we are raised, and the experiences we go through, the most important influence in becoming

Is The Nature Of Crime In Our Society Accurately Presented By The Media? Discuss

1656 words - 7 pages Untitled Is the nature of crime in our society accurately presented by the media? Discuss. Introduction A considerable amount of literature consistently argues that the way crime is portrayed in the media significantly differs from what official records and research tell us, that is to say, that the media is said to misrepresent the crime problem. Five main arguments are presented demonstrating that the media distorts the crime

Nature Vs. Nurture In Frankenstein Essay

956 words - 4 pages ure vs. Nurture in Frankenstein Andrew Lustig proposed a great question to the readers of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, “How far should we go in out efforts to alter nature, including human nature? As stewards of God’s creation what are our responsibilities?” (Lustig 1) This question results in theme of nature vs. nurture in the novel. The nature vs. nurture debate is an important topic in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein. The two central

Nature Vs. Nurture In Sport Essay

1423 words - 6 pages What makes a good athlete? What separates a person on the 1st line up from a bench warmer? Where does athleticism come from? Is it from our genes, or is it a product of the environment we live in? These are the types of questions that arise in the nature vs. nurture debate pertaining about athletic ability. In 1582, British educator, Richard Mulcaster wrote that
''Nature makes the boy toward, nurture sees him forward,'' he gave the world