After reading Suzanne Britt’s “Neat People vs. Sloppy People” and Bruce Catton’s “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts,” there are many comparisons that can be made. Although they seem to be very different, these essays are a lot alike. First, both essays compare two different “types” of people, although Catton’s “Grant and Lee” uses specific people as representatives of the “types” he compares, while Britt does not use specific people, only referring to the more general groups of either neat people or sloppy people. Second, both essays are organized in the side by side pattern, making all the points about one side or group, and then making all the points about the second side. Either before or after talking separately about each side, they are tied together in the introduction and the conclusion where the comparisons are pointed out. Lastly, both authors use emotion and vivid imagery to make the reader feel a certain way as they read ...view middle of the document...
In “Neat People vs. Sloppy People,” Britt is more general, not using specific people to represent either neat people or sloppy people. Even though Catton uses two specific people as representatives for his two sides and Britt does not, both essays make comparisons about two different “types” of people.
The second thing these essays have in common is the way in which they are written and organized. Both essays are written in the side by side pattern, where the author talks about one group or side for a few paragraphs, and then talks about the other side for a while. The comparisons are mostly made in the introduction and the conclusion, instead of being compared point by point. In “Neat People,” Britt writes about sloppy people for the first half of the essay, and then writes about neat people for the second half. Her only obvious comparisons are in her introduction. Catton’s “Grant and Lee” is almost exactly the same. First, Catton makes his introduction, in which he makes a quick comparison, and then he moves on to write about Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant separately.
Lastly, these two essays are both written using emotion and vivid imagery to make the reader “feel” something. In “Neat People,” Britt talks about things like sloppy people having a “heavenly vision” and neat people being “vicious” and “incredibly wasteful.” She uses emotionally charged writing to make the reader more inclines to take her side. Catton does not use as much emotion, nor does he seem to favor one side over the other, but he does use vivid imagery to make the reader feel closer to the story. He writes in such a way that enables the reader to visualize in detail the people and time in history that he’s writing about.
Overall, although the essays “Neat People vs. Sloppy people” and “Grant and Lee” are about totally different subjects, they have a lot of similarities. Both essays are generally comparing different types or groups of people, they both use the same pattern of organization, and they both use emotion and vivid imagery to add depth to their story. This just goes to show that even though authors write in different ways about different subjects, they often end up using the same tools and patterns to tell their stories.