This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Needless Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation Is Wrong

964 words - 4 pages

Needless Animal Experimentation is Wrong

If penicillin had been tested on guinea pigs, it might never have reached the public. It is lethal to guinea pigs, deactivates the blood system of rabbits and is deadly to cats ("Bio-Medical Research"). Scientists are pushing for more experiments regardless of the cost to the animal's life. "One expense is the involvement of killing animals in the pursuit of a pine-scented air freshener"(Vergoth,p21).

Animals suffering in experimentation labs are in just and cruel to animals. It is wrong to harm an innocent animal of any wrong doing, when the animal doesn't know right from wrong. It is argued that people have an obligation to animals, so that we can protect their welfare.

Charles Fried claims "physical harm as an impingement upon the body which either causes pain or impairs functioning" (Fox, p85). Many animals experience pain, and sometimes death, during lab experiments. No animal experiments can be justified. Animals have helped in some ways, such as the discovery of the polio vaccine.

Vivisection can be defined as an invasive experiment performed on an animal for the purpose of scientific research, product testing or education ("The National. . ."). Vivisection is extremely wrong because it causes pain and suffering on animals. Animals are entitled to be free from acts of cruelty. Animals, however, are important in research because their body systems are almost identical to humans. The use of dogs developed open-heart surgical techniques, coronary bypass surgery, and heart transplantation. Animals have helped in some ways, such as the discovery of the polio vaccine.

The pulsing pain of electrodes planted in a chimps' brain is repulsive. The death of a tortured raccoon caught in a leg trap is agonizing. This is why animal experiments are so wrong. Some might say that all animals are resources.

More than five billion dollars of federal tax revenue are spent annually on animal research ("Bio-Medical Research"). With that money there could be drug rehabilitation programs, nutrition counseling for the disadvantaged, or even improving water and air quality; but instead animals get experimented on. Animals, like the rest of nature, were understood not have any sort of value, except to bring enjoyment to lives. Animal life has some value (Frey, p27).

Scientists test products on animals to see if they are safe, or if any side effects may occur. Many different companies use tests on animals, such as: the Draize Test and the LD-50, or Lethal Dose 50 Percent.

The Draize Test is used to measure the harmfulness of chemicals found in household products and cosmetics, by observing the damage they cause to the eyes and skin of animals ("Product Testing"). Albino rabbits are used for the eye irritancy of a solution. The rabbits suffer extreme pain, mutilation and blindness. Often the rabbits' eyes are held open with metal clips. The damage to their eyes are irreparable and leave the...

Find Another Essay On Needless Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation is Wrong

A More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1628 words - 7 pages It’s Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation The debate about using animals for medical testing has been raging for years. The struggle always seems to be between extremist animal rights activists who believe that animals should never be used for research, and scientists who believe that any use of animals is acceptable. There are a growing number who argue that there must be a reasonable

The Cruelty of Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1391 words - 6 pages can be alternatives to research and testing that involve animal suffering, then it is a scientist's responsibility to adopt these alternatives. Needless suffering of any creature is not progress. As Fox says, "if the pain and suffering to the animal would be greater than the amount of pain and suffering that a human might feel under the same circumstances, then the experiment should not be permitted" (64). According to the March 1995 edition

Animal Testing: Is it Right or Wrong?

1609 words - 7 pages Animal Testing- Is it Right or Wrong? Everyday, people all around the world use facial products, receive vaccinations and take antibiotics or medications that have been previously tested on animals. Rarely people think about whether or not animals have been tortured to use the products that they are using, but simply only think of themselves and their own well-being. “An estimated 26 million animals are used each year in the United States for

It's Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1442 words - 6 pages The debate about using animals for medical testing has been ongoing for years. The struggle is usually between extreme animal rights activists and scientists. The animal rights activists believe animals should never be used for research, and the scientists believe any use of animals is acceptable. Listed below are factual historical accounts of animal use, statistics, and arguments against the use of animals. In ancient Greece animals were

A problem/solution essay on Animal Testing, and why it is wrong

903 words - 4 pages methods for getting results are moral, practical, effective and less expensive. All animal testing should stop and be outlaw, for it's not essential in this day in age.Works CitedAnimal Testing. Americans For Medical Progress. 26 Oct. 2003Barnard, Neal, and Stephen Kaufman. "Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading." Scientific American. Feb. 1997: 80-82Gorilla Foundation - Koko the Gorilla. 24 Oct. 2003People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. 24 Oct. 2003Thacher, Wendy. "Chimpanzees: Test Results That Don't Apply to Humans". PCRM Animal Experimentation Issues. 25 Oct. 2003.

Animal Testing Wrong or Right?

2080 words - 8 pages procedures so as to lesson animal suffering".Reduction means to receive maximum information from fewer animals.Replacement means to use alternative methods other than testing on animals.Refinement means to minimize animal pain and suffering by using alternative methods.Animal research or otherwise know as animal testing is using non-human animals to do experiments on. Roughly there are 100 million animals used yearly and later destroyed in testing

Animal Testing - Necessary or Barbaric and Wrong? - Discursive Essay

1508 words - 6 pages vaccinations are available for dogs, and a cat flu vaccination is available too. Often, treatments are similar in animals and humans, therefore in some cases, their research benefits animals too.There is a lot of opposition to animal testing. Organisations such as PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) exist in order to protect the lives of animals and to prevent animal testing from having to happen. Many people believe that it is morally wrong

Animal Testing: Right or Wrong? Jeremy Bentham

1365 words - 5 pages test products on animals when there are countless other alternatives. We need to stop buying the products from the companies that support animal experimentation and start buying from those who use alternative methods of testing their products. We need to convince others that animal testing is wrong and by doing so we can stop the companies that do it and support those who don’t. With more people voicing the wrongs of animal testing we can turn

Animal Experimentation and Research

2622 words - 10 pages contradictory views on this issue. Particularly, who really knows the answer to this issue? Who has the credibility and authority to make such a decision? This is one of the key problems with arguing ethics. I have been on both sides of this issue, and I think that both have valid reasons on why the practice of experimentation and research is wrong and right. I am an animal lover; I have had pets and even raised a Leader Dog for the Blind. I

Animal Experimentation is Ethical and Necessary

1168 words - 5 pages experimentation has been helpful in leading researchers to immense expanses in invaluable scientific discovery (Ericson para 9) Most medical breakthroughs of the twentieth century included animal testing in some manner (Saraf 6). Even though there are numerous guidelines and protocols that enforce the ethical treatment of laboratory animals, it is still a particularly controversial issue to animal rights activists and the general public

Animal Experimentation is Necessary

1607 words - 6 pages and kennels, where the unwanted animals are, unfortunately, destined to be euthanized anyway.  While it is correct that C.C. Baird has previously violated some aspects of the Animal Welfare Act, he has since made the necessary improvements and ultimately has been approved by the USDA.  Baird would not have been approved if he truly were still violating the Animal Welfare Act, or if he were selling stolen pets.        The Daily's claim that

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Is Wrong Essay

1801 words - 7 pages that most would agree that animal abuse is wrong. So, if animal abuse is wrong and animal testing can be, and usually is, much more painful and severe than animal abuse; why can’t people agree on the subject of animal testing? However, the argument for animal testing is also legitimate. Animal testing can help scientists find side effects, medicines, even cures. So, are the advantages of testing on animals worth the ethical issues it creates

Is Animal Testing Wrong? Essay

785 words - 4 pages out there that work perfectly fine and why should we need another cleaning product, would you not rather have another animals life on the planet instead of a surface spray? Testing is wasteful. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experiments and squandering precious money, time and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these

We Need More Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1477 words - 6 pages research -- research in which laboratory animals have played, and continue to play, a critical role. Opponents of animal testing are wrongfully determined that this process is completely unethical. Animals have been used for experimentation for around 2,000 years. In the third century BC in Alexandria, Egypt, the philosopher and scientist Erisistratus used animals to study the human body. Five centuries later, the Roman scientist Galen used apes and

Let's Put An End To Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

2006 words - 8 pages We Must Put an End to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and