Negotiating With Terrorists Encourages More Terrorism

806 words - 4 pages

One assumption made about terrorism is that you shouldn’t, or can’t, negotiate with terrorists because it will only incite more violence and encourage further terrorism. Many people have made this claim, from politicians to leading scholars in the field. At the height of terrorist activity from the Irish Republican Army, the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher vowed to never negotiate with terrorists. Likewise, after the 9/11 attacks in America, President George Bush vowed to never negotiate with terrorists because it would only encourage them towards more violence. Similar claims have been made by many world leaders, including leaders from Turkey, Spain, and Columbia. But world leaders aren’t the only ones who make this claim. Paul Wilkinson, a well-known scholar, after attacks in Egypt in 1997 that resulted in the deaths of dozens of tourists, stated that it would be ‘totally unacceptable’ to open discussions with the responsible terrorists.[1] Many scholars agree with his assessment and feel that negotiations only incite further violence.

Why does this aversion to negotiate exist? Many of those that argue for truth of this assumption have stated that negotiating with terrorists legitimizes them and in the process weakens democratic governments, leading to continued terrorist actions. Is this assumption valid? It is very important to study this assumption because it addresses both academic and social needs.

From an academic standpoint, taking a strong stance against negotiations means preventing a ‘systematic exploration’ of the best way to tackle negotiations.[2] Academics need to look at answering several questions. Which terrorists are likely to negotiate? And when and how should that process begin? Another point of concern is that many terrorism studies today are focused on the short-term and are problem focused. But this neglects the long-term issues and prevents studies which will question important assumptions and ideologies.[3] From a societal standpoint, there could be benefits to negotiating and it would be premature to take that option off the table. You can’t say that negotiations will work in every case, but likewise you can’t say that they will never work either. Governments need to study this and consider how to go about negotiations without weakening their position or setting dangerous precedents that lead to further terrorist activities.

It is important to consider that not all situations are the same and not all terrorists are the same. Should there be blanket policies against...

Find Another Essay On Negotiating with terrorists encourages more terrorism

Terrorism is a Growing Form of Political Influence

2554 words - 10 pages before they can attempt to apply it. When negotiating with a terrorist it is not like negotiating for a used car that is you are negotiating against your interests. To better explain the U.S. would rather there weren't terrorists at all even if we have a good way to deal with them. This form of negotiation is known as negotiation under duress. Now that the difference between negotiating and terrorist negotiating has been established three questions

Terrorism Essay

2717 words - 11 pages avoid interrogation and incarceration. Often these leaders have some type of mind control on their followers.      Some countries don't bother negotiating with terrorists. They take a stance where if the terrorist asks for a million bucks they get squat. The United States has a policy that is meant to deter terrorist-acts, no negotiations, no mercy. 2) My position on this topic is anti-terrorism because terrorism is an

How to define terrorism

1558 words - 6 pages would be outside it. Conversely, by recognizing and excluding particular tactics, countries can more easily combine forces to limit the tools available to terrorists. In this, countries would at least be obligated to act against terrorists, even when they agree with the terrorists' goals.John V. Whitbeck, international lawyer, cautions people on the "notorious subjectivity of this word." He asserts that an objective definition of terrorism is not

Terroisims Threat To Australia - A Federal Issue

305 words - 2 pages Terrorism is everywhere, even Australia so Australia has joined a global campaign to stop this evil. For peace and freedom Australia is supporting this campaign with determination.This global campaign has achieved to destroy the Taliban regime and have stopped many terrorists around the world. But there is a lot more needed to be done to stop terrorism as terrorist are fearless warriors who do not fear death or pain.Australia's alliance with the

The Psychology of Terrorism

2822 words - 11 pages attracted more to the group than toward the acts of terrorism per se” (20). Planning an attack without the aid of outside funding and training could prove to be a difficult task, but the aid along with group motivation and identity go a long way in indoctrinating potential terrorists. Once they join a group, the group psychology and motivation plays a large role. Anthropologist Scott Atran writes at great length about the group dynamics in his book

Terrorism Profile

1320 words - 5 pages . (Mockaitis par, 1) The primary reason for terrorist actions is to force a change in their nation's government. If terrorists are not satisfied with there government's political positions, they may end up taking the matters into there own hands. Another reason for terrorist acts is because of hate towards a race, nationality, or religion. In recent years, terrorism seems to be at a new high and attacks are more violent than in the past. Many groups

The Government Should Detain Suspected Terrorists Without Trial

1326 words - 6 pages culture.(Friedman). By detaining homegrown terrorists, it will lessen the issue of National Security cracks. Also, preventing terrorism on American Soil is increasing security in vulnerable places by creating a more secure privacy and prevention system. (Friedman). Removing the threat of terrorists will help save the lives of our citizens. According to Lauri Friedman, in 2005, 11,111 terrorist attacks occurred;74,087 people were killed worldwide

Terrorists: How different are they?

1771 words - 7 pages Terrorists: How different are they? Ever since September 11th, terrorism has been on virtually all of our minds. And now, some eighteen months later, as the nation perches on the brink of war with Iraq, our fears remain. The frustration that most people experience in the aftermath of extreme violence is largely the result of the question why. Why would anyone want to commit so heinous a crime? How could they live with themselves

balls

948 words - 4 pages Munich Olympics. One of the men involved Salah Khalef justified his actions and believed that the lethal attacks were not terrorism because he opposes terrorism. “By nature, and even on ideological grounds, I am firmly opposed to political murder and, more generally, to terrorism. Nevertheless, unlike many others, I do not confuse revolutionary violence with terrorism, or operations that constitute political acts with others that do not”3 Salah

Terrorism

531 words - 2 pages group, or even governments may commit terrorist actions. Unlike criminals, most terrorists claim to be dedicated to higher causes. Repeated methods of terrorism involve threats, bombings, and the destruction of property, kidnapping, hostages, executions, and assassinations. There are many reasons that political groups attempt to bring radical change through terrorism. People are often frustrated with their position in society. Some feel

Freedom or Security? An Analysis of the War Measures Act, 1970

929 words - 4 pages Canadian citizens, the defense of democracy and the inevitable need for help from the federal government. The FLQ committed violent crimes for their separatist cause, therefore they would not be considered as ordinary criminals, but as nationalist terrorists that Canada must defend themselves against.The War Measures Act was not imposed merely to defend an important principle regarding negotiating with terrorists, but it was used to provide safety for

Similar Essays

The Impact Of Terrorism Essay

1883 words - 8 pages biggest act of terror 9/11 has impacted many Americans lives and security. For these inhumane acts to never happen again we have to fight back against terrorism. To fight back we must not fight an entire group, but a small minority and fighting back with violence will only make the terrorists, stronger and so we must find another way to fight terrorism. Negotiating has been made clear that it will not happen with terrorists and so there is a question

Canada's Fight Against Terrorism Essay

1131 words - 5 pages conventions and resolutions to end terrorism (“Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations”). Canada supports the efforts of the Security Council, which adopted Resolution 1373. This Resolution deals with criminalizing those who are involved in helping terrorists in any way (“Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations”). As mentioned earlier, Canada established the Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program to aid in the efforts

Challenges For Us Counter Terrorism Efforts Essay

1269 words - 5 pages diplomatic and military instruments to deter potential state sponsors.  Today, however, many terrorist organizations and individuals act independently from former and present state sponsors, shifting to other sources of support, including the development of transnational networks.   Many terrorism experts have suggested a shift in the type of violence terrorists are willing to inflict.  Terrorism statistics indicate an overall reduction

The Relationship Of Terrorism And Drugs

962 words - 4 pages The Relationship of Terrorism and Drugs Terrorism has many and varied links to the drug trade. Terrorists may use drugs for funding of their cause; may include drugs as part of their cause, as in Peru; or terrorism may be the result of the drug trade, as it is in Columbia's Extraditables and Italy's mafia. With the many linkages between the two crimes it seems that to crackdown on one you must crackdown on the other. The ties between the