Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince And Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

1045 words - 4 pages

The Bible teaches love, compassion and generosity. Niccolo Machiavelli found the Bible’s lessons idealistic and unrealistic for leaders. Machiavelli wrote his book, The Prince, to show the ruling Meddici family that the world is not a fairy tale. Prior to Machiavelli writing The Prince, the majority of books depicted people as virtuous and ethical. However, The Prince is not the only work of literature that manifests Machiavellian techniques. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar utilizes similar methods. As shown in Julius Caesar and The Prince, a leader who follows Machiavelli’s advice will accomplish their goals; if the leader does not adhere to Machiavelli’s recommendations, then the leader will not fulfill his aspiration.
A character from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Cassius, exhibits Machiavellian attributes by manipulation and a drive to accomplish his goal of assassinating Julius Caesar by any means. Cassius was able to successfully manipulate both Brutus and the fellow conspirators. Cassius was able to influence Brutus enough to make Brutus believe that killing Julius Caesar, Brutus’ best friend, was the right action. Initially, Brutus was wary of Cassius when Brutus said, “Into what dangers would you lead me, Cassius?” (1.2.69) Subsequently, Brutus is persuaded as he states, “...what you have said / I will consider” (1.2.176-177). Cassius is willing to control any person who stands in his way. Cassius successfully turned Brutus against his best friend in order to achieve what Cassius believes to be best for Rome. When Brutus says, “Let me not hinder, Cassius, your desires” (1.2.35) it is clear that Cassius has swayed Brutus to believe in his cause. In Julius Caesar, we do not see Cassius as the main leader of the conspiracy to kill Caesar; rather Brutus is the main leader. But with this quote, Brutus is merely the face for the real leader of the conspiracy, who is Cassius. In Julius Caesar, Cassius achieved his goal of executing Caesar by applying Machiavellian approaches. Machiavelli wrote, “One can make this generalization about men: they are ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers” (Prince 3). The description Machiavelli gives of men is equivalent to Cassius’ actions.
Antony, another Julius Caesar character, employs three Machiavellian skills: using fickleness to his advantage,“...while you treat them well, they are yours” (Prince 3), and ruling by fear. Antony’s objective was revenge toward the conspirators for killing Caesar. Antony also successfully used the fickleness of the Roman people to his advantage. After Brutus explained why the conspirators had killed Caesar, the crowd was understanding and agreed with the conspirator’s actions. The Roman peasants are convinced; they even want Brutus as their new emperor, with better qualities than Caesar. The plebians say, “Caesar’s better parts / Shall be crowned in Brutus” (3.2.54-55). But the level of the masses’ support for Brutus did not deter Antony’s opinion of the wrongdoing...

Find Another Essay On Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince and Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

Qualities of a Good Ruler- Based on Niccolo Machiavelli's - "The Prince."

1038 words - 4 pages In history, the main reason why a nation prospers is because of its leader. The best written piece I have come across on this topic is Niccolo Machiavelli's book, "The Prince". A leader should be intelligent, strong, caring and devoted to his subjects. Although people have different opinions in the qualities of a good ruler, all believe that a leader should help his nation grow and thrive.In his book, "The Prince", Niccolo Machiavelli states his

Betrayal in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Hamlet, and Julius Caesar

1874 words - 8 pages "Et tu – Brute?" “Yet each man kills the thing he loves By each let this be heard,Some do it with a bitter look,Some with a flattering word,The coward does it with a kiss,The brave man with a sword,” by Oscar Wilde. In the tragedies of Shakespeare we encounter betrayal upon his plays and how it leads to catastrophic consequences. In this case Macbeth, hamlet and Julius Caesar are no exceptions. In the Shakespearean tragedies Macbeth Hamlet, and

The Nature of Man Explored in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

1862 words - 7 pages Much speculation has arisen over why Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar. Some say he was he was predicting what would happen should civil war break out in England. Shakespeare lived from 1564 to 1616 in the Elizabethan era. Julius Caesar was written in 1599, near the end of the Queen’s reign. Elizabeth was growing old and still had no heir; the future ruler of England lay in question. Undoubtedly, multiple candidates would strive for the throne

Julius Caesar As A Real Person Verses Julius Caesar In Shakespeare’s Play

1793 words - 7 pages let one travel back in time? The answer still stands, but Shakespeare in his play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar had been able to do it, or at least made an attempt. With this play he had been able to carry people back and forth in time. In the next few minutes one will experience, relive, and compare the Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play with the true Julius Caesar. The interpretation of the facts must be left to each person seeking the true

Brutus’ Love for Rome in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

897 words - 4 pages Brutus was a well-known person who loved Rome. His love for Rome led to him helping someone murder Julius Caesar, his leader. As a person do you love and care about your state or country so much that you would kill your leader to protect the people in it? Brutus cared so much about Rome and his people that he did just that. He lost his life for Rome, and it truly showed how much he cared for the people, which showed his level of honor. An

Rhetorical Devices in Mark Antony’s Funerary Speech from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

1052 words - 4 pages Chris Davis evokes feelings of defeat and revenge from the stadium as he catches a missed field goal and rushes 109 yards to score a touchdown just one second before the end of the game. His intention of winning the game can be applied in speeches, where people use certain moves with the intention of obtaining a certain outcome. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony stands on the capitol steps, addressing Rome’s countrymen. He speaks on

Virtu and Fortune in Machiavelli's The Prince

2406 words - 10 pages fortune and luck, questioning how the Duke would fare after a change of fortune. From Machiavelli's description of the Duke's persona, it is evident that this trip contributed heavily to 'The Prince' and Machiavelli's descriptions of the ideal temperament and personality of a prince or ruler. Between 1503 and 1508, fascinated by papal politics, Machiavelli toured the court of Julius II (who was also known as "The Fearsome Pope" /Il Papa Terribile and

Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince

1154 words - 5 pages Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince When the word "Renaissance" is mentioned, an image of love for antiquity learning and fine arts usually springs to one's mind. Yet this perception, however legitimate it may be in many areas of Renaissance human achievements, shatters in the face of Niccolò Machiavelli's masterpiece The Prince. Unlike his contemporary Baldassare Castiglione who exemplified subtlety, Machiavelli was

Comparing Orwell's "1984" and Machiavelli's "The Prince"

1932 words - 8 pages information within the society makes sure that they will never know if their beliefs are indeed the popular beliefs of the country. Therefore, a revolution against the government is highly unlikely as the challenges faced by these groups are enormous. In his thoughts in The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli makes an astonishing conclusion about governing – that fear can and should be used to control a populace. Specifically, he speaks of evil deeds

Machiavelli's "The Prince"

750 words - 3 pages Niccolo Machiavelli offers his constructive thoughts regarding numerous complex issues within his book "The Prince". Exiled when Pope Julius II defeated the French and took over Florence, Machiavelli did not have faith in the church. He saw the corruption in the Church as a self-destructing weakness and was not convinced of the Church's virtue. Machiavelli's animosity against the Catholic Church, along with his desire to be reinstated to public

Machiavelli's The Prince

1396 words - 6 pages Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince and The Discourses, New York, NY: Modern Library,1950 Mckay, John P, Bennet D. Hill, and John Buckler. A History of Western Society. Boston, MA: Houghton Miffline Company, 2006 Mansfield, Harvey Claflin. Machiavelli's Virtue. Chicago, OH, 1998

Similar Essays

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Essay

1043 words - 4 pages Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the nature of power and his views of power are still somewhat in existence today. I'll discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Machiavelli discusses power over the people, dictatorial power, and power with people, shared power. While it is possible for power with to attain greater prevalence in society, it will not completely eliminate power

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Essay

1189 words - 5 pages More than 480 years ago, Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince was published. It established a system of governance influential still today. His ideas were available before thinkers such as Rousseau and Locke. Men who believed that government derived its just powers from the consent of the governed. Machiavelli, unlike Rousseau and Locke, did not suggest government of the people, but government were power was centralized and secure in the hands of

Comparing Leadership In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar And Machiavelli’s The Prince

1467 words - 6 pages the “right” decisions for the community, taking the blame, and being selfless. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Machiavelli’s The Prince, there are various examples as to what is the difference between a good and a bad leader, including initiative, accountability, generosity, and the leader’s values. A leader must learn to take the initiatives for many of his projects. In Julius Caesar, Cassius tries to convince Brutus of joining the

Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Vs. Plutarch’s Julius Caesar

1561 words - 6 pages "He doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus"(Julius Caesar 1.2.142-43).These words were spoken by Cassius, a character in Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar.He is speaking about Julius Caesar and Caesar's arrogance and overconfidence. This quote also shows how Shakespeare perceived Julius Caesar as a prominent and influential man of his time. However, this view is not shared by all of the biographers that chose to write about Julius Caesar