No Child Left Behind Law Essay

978 words - 4 pages

Throughout my early education in elementary school, I was fortunate to have teachers who were intellectual, creative, fun, and passionate about their job. They made the classroom exciting and memorable by assigning intriguing projects that revolved around art, science, history, and more. Unfortunately, today much of this creative freedom has been taken away from teachers. In 2002, President George W. Bush passed the No Child Left Behind law, which required public schools to test students and meet certain standards in order to receive funding. NCLB was supposed to ensure student and school success however, it caused a shift in curriculum that fails to cover a broad range of subjects and often overlooks upper level students. Instead of continuing to teach fascinating material, many teachers are forced to focus mainly on math and reading to guarantee students will pass standardized tests, so their schools can receive funding. In the past nine years, No Child Left Behind has failed to improve public schools and is instead hurting struggling schools, eliminating important programs, and holding back high achieving students.
No Child Left Behind was originally created to encourage higher standards in schools by making sure students were proficient in math and reading at their grade level. The law is “structured around the annual proficiency testing and reporting of each public school district throughout the nation.” (“No Child Left Behind”) States were required to develop standardized tests that would evaluate both student and teacher progress. These tests would determine what material teachers should use and the amount of funding public schools would receive.
Under No Child Left Behind, schools that meet state standards continue to receive funding while struggling schools that fail “to meet the proficiency levels outlined by the state must provide additional resources to its students to ensure they can succeed.” (“No Child Left Behind”) Public schools that repeatedly test below the state standard do not receive federal funding and are forced to make adjustments including eliminating teachers, hiring new principles, executing improvement strategies, and, in some cases, “closing the school and enrolling the students in other higher-achieving schools in the district.” (Norton) In the past few years, as school districts budgets have been shrinking, many schools lose much needing funding when then do meet state standards. Without these extra funds they are unable to create programs to improve their students scores, which often leads to extreme measures such as closing schools. Throughout the United States “schools serving low-income students with crumbling facilities, overcrowded classrooms, out-of-date textbooks, no science labs, no art or music courses and a revolving door of untrained teachers, while their suburban counterparts, spending twice as much for students with fewer needs, offer expansive libraries, up-to-date labs and technology, small...

Find Another Essay On No Child Left Behind Law

No Child Left Behind Essay

1010 words - 4 pages No Child Left Behind As students in a Structure & Philosophy class, one of the main components has been to introduce and familiarize us with the No Child Left Behind Act. President Bush passed this legislation on January 8, 2002. The NCLB Act was designed to ensure each and every student the right to a fair education, to give parents more options in their child’s education, and to guarantee all teachers are highly qualified. By highly

No Child Left Behind Essay

2884 words - 12 pages order to try and standardize schools across the country in hopes of closing the education gap between students in various states, social classes, and races. President Bush then signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2002, which did not take away from the purpose of ESEA, but rather acted like a caveat to it. This new legislation was intended to improve the quality of public education by requiring schools to improve their performance. It

No Child Left Behind Debate

1691 words - 7 pages . 2009. <http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/31/1558>."No Child Left Behind Act -." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Web. 13 Dec. 2009. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act#Quality_of_education>."Op-Ed -." TheHill.com. Web. 13 Dec. 2009. <http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed>."Q&A About No Child Left Behind." Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Web. 13 Dec. 2009. <http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/nclb/QandA.html>.Bush Signing "No Child Left Behind" into law

No Child Left Behind Act

2004 words - 8 pages , “nearly half of school principals and superintendents [viewed] the federal legislation as either politically motivated or aimed at undermining public schools” (No Child Left Behind, 2004).  Similarly, in California a study suggested “the law might disproportionately penalize schools with diverse student populations” (No Child Left Behind, 2004).  These concerns are seen across the nation and vary by state, school district, and school, depending

No Child Left Behind Assessment

1364 words - 5 pages good teaching and setting appropriate assessment tasks should question students in a way that demands evidence of understanding” (Jimaa, 20011, p. 217). The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) education reform program is a good example of this concept. The ambitious federal education bill that President Bush signed into law in 2002, NCLB, required the federal government to use its spending power to prod school districts across the country to rely on

no child left behind act

2208 words - 9 pages Carry congenital defect Moore Nationally? In Dec 2003, "nearly half faculty head and superintendents viewed the Federal jurisprudence s and law creating as either politically intended or geared toward intrusive with public faculty day " (No kid Left Behind, 2004). In virtually identical method, in Golden State an issue recommended "the law penalise faculty with student populations" (No kid Left Behind, 2004). These considerations square measure

No Child Left Behind Analysis

955 words - 4 pages “No Child Left Behind” The Problem Public school districts are known to imply that “No child will be left behind”, after President Bush passed the “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001” in 2002 (No Child Left Behind, 2003). However, many children are and teachers are beginning to be left behind as well. The U.S government is warning educators across the nation of massive terminations, school closures, and shorter school years, claiming the need

No Child Left Behind Essay

1523 words - 6 pages In January 2002 congress, with the encouragement of President Bush, passed a new act that was intended to prevent children from being left behind in education. No Child Left Behind is designed to change the culture of America's schools by closing the achievement gap, offering more flexibility, giving parents more options, and teaching students based on what works. This was and is a great idea. Children are our future and we need to make sure

No child left behind act

572 words - 2 pages Since the leave no child behind act more school districts are beginning to provide programs for their students who have special needs. This case study is about children who are mentally retarded being included in regular classes in high school. This research was taken with the financial help of the Centre de re`adaptation Lisette-Dupras, the Education Department at University` du Que`bec a` Montreal, the foundation quefecoise de las

The No Child Left Behind Act

681 words - 3 pages President George W. Bush originally proposed the No Child Left Behind Act in the year 2001. The No Child Left Behind Act is geared towards public schools. It required the public schools to do more standardized testing and penalized schools whose students scored below benchmarks. President Bush considered the No Child Left Behind Act a close to home project. While he was the governor of Texas he renewed a law giving schools in Texas more

No Child Left Behind is Ruining America

825 words - 4 pages Is a No Child Left Behind Act helping student in school from 1st grade until they graduate high school? No, the No Child Left Behind Act is not helping students. “Emphasizes on yearly progress forces teachers to focus on preparing for tests instead of teaching life skill (Montey, pg. 162).” The quote from Neill Montey explains how No Child Left Behind can potentially corrupt the learning experiences for students. The No Child Left Behind Act

Similar Essays

No Child Left Behind Essay

862 words - 3 pages Kristian Henriksen SheaMrs. ReduzziEnglish 10 HL10 March 2014No Child Left BehindThe law known as No Child Left Behind, NCLB, has caused many problems for the American educational system. "In addition, it forces teachers to "teach to the test," spending far too much time on test-taking strategies rather than learning" (Hobart). NCLB is harmful to the American economy and educational system and should not continue to receive funding from the

No Child Left Behind Essay

618 words - 3 pages graduating, is something to look forward too, and having that all taken away, is something really bad to have happen. The law, "Is an act to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind. Schools would not want to miss out on government fundings. In order for them, "To receive federal school funding, States must give these assessments to all students at select grade levels." Although

No Child Left Behind Essay

1699 words - 7 pages . McGuinn exclaimed, “No Child Left behind is an attempt by the federal government to regulate educational policy in the 50 states” (Patrick McGuinn,2007, p. 370). It is also designed to make sure that all students can achieve high standards from all states which include students with disabilities. Before the NCLB was passed, students with disabilities were excluded from school assessments. Now that this act was passed, this law works with the

No Child Left Behind Essay

2533 words - 10 pages ). States unclear on ESEA rules about reading. Education Week online. Retrieved February 14, 2003. http://www.edweek.org PALs and reading first. Virginia Department of Education. Retrieved March 23, 2003. pp. 1-11. Thomas, D. and Bainbridge, W. (June 2002), No child left behind: Facts and fallacies. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 781. Toppo, G. (2003, January 28). Most states lag far behind ‘No child left behind’ law. USA Today