This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

No “More” Socialism: Debunking Raphael Hythlodaeus’ Argument Against Private Property

1990 words - 8 pages

George Orwell, in his famous essay, “Why Socialists Don’t Believe in Fun,” aptly described the problem of any Utopian ideal. “It would seem that human beings are not able to describe, nor perhaps to imagine, happiness except in terms of contrast… Nearly all creators of Utopia have resembled the man who has (a) toothache, and therefore thinks happiness consists in not having a toothache. They wanted to produce a perfect society by an endless continuation of something that had only been valuable because it was temporary” (Orwell). In Thomas More’s Utopia, Raphael Hythloday is used as a conduit through which More expresses his distaste with private property. It is striking how true Orwell’s words can be applied to More’s Utopia. More’s criticism of private property is structurally fallible, and his description of an alternative is deeply implausible.
Raphael is used to lay out the Utopian alternative economic and civic system, from the common-place “peasant subsistence economy” of More’s England through his description of the idealist island of Utopia (Overton 4). Raphael’s case against private property is built upon two principle supports; the perceived fallacies and failures in a peasant subsistence capitalistic economy, and how seemingly intuitive the socialistic alternatives of the island of Utopia are in solving the tribulations which so perplex the world’s peasantry. If we analyze Raphael’s argument, we find that it is grossly mis-calculated. The assumptions made in both the construction of Utopia and the deconstruction of England’s economic system are both contradictory and completely over-simplified. With our advantage of economic and historical hindsight we can see that Raphael lays blame without knowledge, and we can see that he ineffectively creates an island as doomed to fail as Gorbachev’s Soviet Union, leading to oppression on the scale of Orwell’s 1984.
Raphael’s tearing down of the idea of private property begins with attacking wealth in the hands of a monarch. He talks of advisers presenting their theory of how the king should handle monetary policy in his kingdom. The advisers suggest a multitude of black-hat revenue increasing measures, including; currency manipulation, increased taxation under the guise of war, arbitrary fines for superfluous laws, and bribery of judges; all of the advisers agreeing that “a king can never have too much gold” (More 31). Raphael tells us how he would advise the king, saying that he instead would advocate for empowering the people and their finances. He describes a model for his monetary policy based on the “Macarians,” who placed a finite limit on the wealth of their king to “keep him in check” (More 33).
In his initial pitch against property rights, Raphael lauds the benefit of a central institution making monetary and fiscal policy. Raphael’s view of strengthening the working class is valuable, and a major way to increase their virility is through “bottom up” fiscal and monetary policy....

Find Another Essay On No “More” Socialism: Debunking Raphael Hythlodaeus’ Argument Against Private Property

The Political Structure of More’s Utopia

2697 words - 11 pages its own and private property is eliminated. In his creation of Utopia, More attempted to remove any possible temptation from the Utopian citizen, suggesting that the accumulation of material goods leads to a moral decline. Gold and silver, precious commodities in the materially driven world, hold no value to the citizens of Utopia. These metals are viewed as “inferior to iron in usefulness” (More 85). To avoid the danger of the “common folk

"The Utopia" of Book Two is a clear expression of More's reaction to his own context. Explain with specific examples from the book

985 words - 4 pages , led to high productivity and economic stability. More expresses that the abolition of private property removes class-based social stratification and wealth. The Utopians remove the mechanisms with which much harm is done by communalism. In Utopia, there is no poverty and everyone works, quite unlike the More's feudal society, wherein there was much poverty and an inequitable distribution of labour. Hythloday argues," you can ever get any

Is More's Utopia a Product of Its Time?

2078 words - 8 pages knowledge of the King and court. The same can be said of the laws and punishments that exist in utopia, as a lawyer More must have brought his own vocational knowledge to the idyllic law and order system of utopia. In a time where More himself allegedly burnt heretics at the stake the talk of Utopias liberal and restrained punishment system may be surprising, Raphael says of thievery "to my mind no amount of property is worth a human life" how can

Analysis of Thomas More's Utopia

6081 words - 24 pages knew him, that he thought nothing to be well spoken except he had ministered some mock in the communication." (*) In Utopia three characters converse, and reports of other conversations enter the story. Thomas More appears as himself. Raphael Hythlodaeus is the fictional traveler to exotic worlds. More's young friend of Antwerp Peter Gillis adds an occasional word. Yet the Thomas More of Utopia is a character in a fiction. He cannot

life of raphael

650 words - 3 pages Raphael was born on April 6 1483 in the small town of Urbino Italy. At age 8 rapheal was sent away by his father to be an apprentice of a master artist. Sadly he had to quickly return home do to his mothers death. Tragedy struck him once again when he was orphaned at age 11. From then on out he lived either with his widowed step mom or with a master whom which trained him. 1 of his masters, Vasari stated that"probably no other pupil of genius

Thomas More's Utopia

1502 words - 6 pages . We learn of his voyages with Amerigo Vespucci, his voyage to Ceylon, Calcutta, back to Portugal, only observing social practices. At this point we read of More's infatuation with Hythloday's recollection of the island of Utopia. We then see More's criticism of society arise. When More and Giles suggest to Hythloday that he "enter the service of some king or other," Raphael responds, "How can I do that by acting against all my instincts

Utopia by Thomas More

1070 words - 4 pages somewhat contrast to the rest of 16th century England and indicate a mind that was far ahead of its time. A number of issues and themes are raised throughout the text to which More provides varying views and opinions. These are transmitted and projected through the perspectives of the fictional Raphael, More and Giles. The most key and predominant aspect of More’s Utopian society is the abolishment of private property. This then leads to a


950 words - 4 pages represented, held the belief that the only way to get what you want is through revolution. These views of socialism held the total opposite views of a man named Adam Smith, who believed in capitalism, and who wrote the book, The Wealth of Nations. There was agreement between the two different forms of Socialism in that they both held the same basic beliefs that the government should run all parts of society and that no one group was any more special

Socialism is Possible and Can Work

1571 words - 6 pages systems proves more and more prevalent. Human beings are naturally greedy and competitive. A further argument against socialism is that human beings by nature are competitive and greedy beings. In this respect, in a society that embraces socialism, some people would take more resources than necessary. In fact, it is quite true that if our supermarkets and other stores were opened today, and the public were invited in to pick as much as they wanted

reform In thomas More's Utopia

1880 words - 8 pages that Thomas More would reach the masses. Ultimately, the biggest criticism is that creating this reform is futile. If the king does not approve of it, there is no real way to implement in it. Raphael lays out two outcomes in trying to argue his point to the king. He would either get laughed out of the court or the king would still not care. This criticism is the most effective against his own argument. Because even though he argues from a

Thomas More's "Utopia"

1563 words - 6 pages the priority amongst its citizens contrary to the egotistical, materialistic driven, self -serving society that is America today. Sir Thomas More exposes the injustices that are abundant in Europe during the end of the feudal system. Mores utopia lacks the Darwinesque survival of the fittest mentality of the corporate world in the 21st century, Utopia is a society without private property, greed, money, class structure, politicians, lawyers, and

Similar Essays

Sir Thomas More’s Utopia: An Alternative To European Life

1790 words - 7 pages argument against an obtainable perfection in Europe. Hythlodaeus thinks highly of the Utopian’s rejection of private property and sees it as the fundamental element in the perfection of their society. The fictitious More and his companion Peter Giles, who is responsible for introducing the group, are not convinced of the validity of Hythlodaeus’s claim. In their opinions, property is fundamental in providing identity, and a lack of property is a lack

Analysis Of Thomas More's Utopia

656 words - 3 pages , make the conscious agreement that More, the author, is transparent through Raphael. Due to the highly controversial opinions that More was making in the text: * "...As long as there is property and money, no nation will be ruled justly, or be happy." * "There are dreadful punishments enacted against thieves" (Raphael against laws of the time) and the pressures of society at the time to be of the same mind to the

Thomas More's Utopia And Its Impact On English Society During The Renaissance

1447 words - 6 pages ideas of capitalism, which was growing rampantly in 16th century Europe, where currency was quickly replacing pay by means of crops or services. Utopia, in contrast, had no form of currency. Hythlodaeus goes on to explain that "[e]lsewhere people talk about the public interest, but pay attention to their own private property. In Utopia, where there is no private property, everyone takes their duty to the public seriously (More, 109).""Utopia" was

"Utopia" By Thomas More Essay

2122 words - 8 pages reason the Utopians can imagine for privacy is to protect property; there being no private property, anybody can walk into your house at any time to see what you're doing. Conformity is king. All the cities and all the houses in the cities look pretty much alike. Of the towns Raphael says, "When you've seen one of them, you've seen them all." (Thomas More, Utopia, tr. Paul Turner, London, Penguin, 1965, p.71)The Utopians change houses by lot