No Child Left Behind Creates More Problems For Students Than It Does Solutions

2546 words - 10 pages

The No Child Left Behind Act was designed by President George W. Bush in 2001. Although this act seems to be cutting edge and has generated enormous amounts of both controversy and support, this is not the first time American Education has seen such an attempt to improve education. According to the U.S. Department of Education, the purpose of No Child Left Behind is to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. ?The NCLB Act of 2001, the revised Elementary and Secondary Education Act, is a potent blend of new requirements, incentives and resources and it poses significant challenges for states? (?Education Commission of the States,? 2003). No Child Left Behind laws require that every state must develop and implement an accountability system; ?Holding schools accountable for the performance of all students is the cornerstone of the NCLB Act? (2003). There are four main principles to the new plan; Greater accountability for student achievement, greater flexibility for states, districts and schools in the use of federal funds (more specifically Title I funds) and more choices for parents of children from disadvantaged backgrounds and an emphasis on teaching methods that have been demonstrated and proven to work. However and even still, No Child Left Behind creates more problems for students than it does solutions because of accountability laws. More specifically, students in special education are held to the same standards that students in regular education are held to.

Under the requirements for No Child Left Behind Act every school must have highly qualified teachers and must meet adequate yearly progress. Additionally, each school must report attendance, test scores and other statistics publicly.

The No Child Left Behind laws requires that every state must develop and implement an accountability system. This system must test students in grades three through eight and ten on their level of proficiency in reading and math. In 2008 there are plans to add science to tests (Wright, 2003). These measures, which are statewide, determine how many students are making Adequate Yearly Progress, or AYP. In other words, those students that are proficient in reading and math are considered to be making AYP. Those that are not passing the tests or are not proficient are considered to not be making Adequate Yearly Progress. At first this appears to be a reasonable measure of student?s abilities. It sounds like it will push both students and teachers to work harder and focus more on student achievement and success. However, as the details of this accountability section of the law unravel it appears to be a lot more complicated. A large part of the problem is who is included when the time comes to count test scores to determine whether or not students are making AYP. No matter what subgroup one comes from they are held responsible making AYP. A subgroup, according to Dennis M Curran (assistant...

Find Another Essay On No Child Left Behind Creates More Problems for Students than it does Solutions

No Child Left Behind Essay

1699 words - 7 pages the states to set the standards for student performance as well as teacher quality. This act helps the educational advancement in schools because it improves the comprehensiveness and fairness of the American education. The NCLB Act was signed by former President George Bush in 2002, which was created to improve student and achievement gaps. In the article, “No Child Left behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy”, Patrick J

No Child Left Behind Essay

2533 words - 10 pages and the amount of money available, no child will be left behind. Why the focus on strengthening the reading skills of children? It has been proven that those students who can not read well are more likely to drop out of school and have lower-paying jobs. Reading is the “foundation for success in society” (Paige, 17). Those students that have a strong early beginning in reading have more successful school careers. Success in reading

No Child Left Behind Essay

1523 words - 6 pages . This does however expand school choice in that it gives parents more direct control of the students' education than previous generations have enjoyed. With expanding school choice it creates instability of funding that causes hardships and inability to manage finances and staffing needs from year to year.NCLB makes provisions for improving teacher quality through professional development and rewarding teacher excellence. "Nothing helps a child

No Child Left Behind Debate

1691 words - 7 pages tests are only measure a limited range of skills rather than a wide range of skills that our educational system should be teaching. These tests focus mostly on memorization, speed of recall, and critical thinking. However a full education is one that inspires students to learn outside the classroom.Thirdly, No Child Left Behind does not make teachers and schools more accountable. First off, this bill says that it wants to make teachers more

No Child Left Behind Act

2004 words - 8 pages the No Child Left Behind Act, time is not equally allotted for these subjects.  The Act forces educators to teach the material to prepare students for the test.  This precludes the educators from teaching a broad range of material and thwarts the educator’s freedom and creativity.  As a result, the students’ learning experience is limited and hindered. Nonetheless, my personal belief that all subjects can be allocated time equally throughout the

No Child Left Behind Law

978 words - 4 pages receive more funding in order to provide similar amenities to students of all socio-economic backgrounds. No Child Left Behind declares that standardized tests only hold students accountable for their reading and math skills. In order to continue receiving funds, many schools are focusing most of their resources into reading and math. Unfortunately, this leads to the reduction and elimination of other vital subjects such as art, music, and

no child left behind act

2208 words - 9 pages to provide them through science, social study, prowess, music, and different study. However, underneath the No child Left Behind Act, time isn't equally assigned for these theme . The Act forces professional person to show the fabric to organize students for the take a look at. This precludes the educators from teaching a broad chain of fabric and thwarts the educator's freedom and power. As a termination , the students' scholarship expertise is

No Child Left Behind Analysis

955 words - 4 pages “No Child Left Behind” The Problem Public school districts are known to imply that “No child will be left behind”, after President Bush passed the “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001” in 2002 (No Child Left Behind, 2003). However, many children are and teachers are beginning to be left behind as well. The U.S government is warning educators across the nation of massive terminations, school closures, and shorter school years, claiming the need

No Child Left Behind Assessment

1364 words - 5 pages good teaching and setting appropriate assessment tasks should question students in a way that demands evidence of understanding” (Jimaa, 20011, p. 217). The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) education reform program is a good example of this concept. The ambitious federal education bill that President Bush signed into law in 2002, NCLB, required the federal government to use its spending power to prod school districts across the country to rely on

No child left behind act

572 words - 2 pages Since the leave no child behind act more school districts are beginning to provide programs for their students who have special needs. This case study is about children who are mentally retarded being included in regular classes in high school. This research was taken with the financial help of the Centre de re`adaptation Lisette-Dupras, the Education Department at University` du Que`bec a` Montreal, the foundation quefecoise de las

No Child Left Behind is Ruining America

825 words - 4 pages Is a No Child Left Behind Act helping student in school from 1st grade until they graduate high school? No, the No Child Left Behind Act is not helping students. “Emphasizes on yearly progress forces teachers to focus on preparing for tests instead of teaching life skill (Montey, pg. 162).” The quote from Neill Montey explains how No Child Left Behind can potentially corrupt the learning experiences for students. The No Child Left Behind Act

Similar Essays

No Child Left Behind Essay

862 words - 3 pages created to give all students, no matter their race, religion, or class, a fair shot at higher education. Many people have criticized the law for hindering lower level students as well as higher level students. "The No Child Left Behind Act harms more students than it helps, bringing down higher tier students when it should be helping lower tier catch up" ( Although many people do oppose NCLB, there are some who believe it has done

No Child Left Behind Essay

618 words - 3 pages graduating, is something to look forward too, and having that all taken away, is something really bad to have happen. The law, "Is an act to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind. Schools would not want to miss out on government fundings. In order for them, "To receive federal school funding, States must give these assessments to all students at select grade levels." Although

No Child Left Behind Essay

1010 words - 4 pages No Child Left Behind As students in a Structure & Philosophy class, one of the main components has been to introduce and familiarize us with the No Child Left Behind Act. President Bush passed this legislation on January 8, 2002. The NCLB Act was designed to ensure each and every student the right to a fair education, to give parents more options in their child’s education, and to guarantee all teachers are highly qualified. By highly

No Child Left Behind Essay

2884 words - 12 pages order to try and standardize schools across the country in hopes of closing the education gap between students in various states, social classes, and races. President Bush then signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2002, which did not take away from the purpose of ESEA, but rather acted like a caveat to it. This new legislation was intended to improve the quality of public education by requiring schools to improve their performance. It