Nsa Is Unconstitutional Essay

1024 words - 5 pages

The NSA is an unconstitutional Federal government agency established by a failed president. In 1952, the worst president in U.S. History, President Truman, established the National Security Agency (NSA). Truman is known for committing the worst crime against humanity by using a nuclear bomb on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, as well as for losing China and North Korea. For a president that is known for his poor performance on foreign policy, Truman establishes the NSA to safeguard American interests from foreign and domestic threat to American National Security.
The NSA surveillance program is a critically important program to the national security in the United States. The ...view middle of the document...

S. Constitution. The first amendment trumps all arguments that NSA is doing the right thing. Even a left wing organization, the ACLU, affirms that NSA surveillance is intrusive and unconstitutional. The NSA should be shut down immediately.
The NSA surveillance program damages foreign relations. The NSA spied on German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cell phone. After the NSA stoped spying on Merkel, the NSA expanded its surveillance on German government officials. The NSA also spies on Japan, our closest friend. The program also targets governmental leaders in countries like Peru, Malaysia, and Guatemala. The list include Abdullah Badawi, the Malaysian Prime Minister, Alan Garcia, Peruvian President, and Alvaro Colom Guatemalan President, and this list include many others world leaders. The U.S. Government has snooped on the EU, UN, and embassies in New York, Washington D.C., and Brussels. Ordinary countries like Germany and Brazil citizens are facing intrusion from the NSA everyday. This revelation deeply damage U.S. foreign relations.
The NSA was not too well known to the American people back in the 70’s, contrary to the CIA and the FBI. However, its program is subject to close scrutiny from the legislative and judicial bodies. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that warrants are required for domestic intelligence surveillance. In 1975, a U.S. Senate Select Committee, the Church Committee, investigated illegal domestic spying by the NSA. During that time, the surveillance program targeted anti-war protesters, civil rights activists, and political opponents. The U.S. Government spying on American citizens is unconstitutional. In response to those investigations, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was signed into law in 1978, protecting Americans from domestic spying.
The U.S. Government forces Lavabit, an encrypted email service to shut down because the U.S. Government violates the fourth amendment by forcing Lavabit to turn over the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL). The owner of Lavabit, Ladar Levision, is under gag order, because the U.S. Government’s intervention. Fortunately, Lavabit gets a new crypto key.
The...

Find Another Essay On NSA is unconstitutional

The Unconstitutionality of The NSA Essay

2276 words - 10 pages the United States and how these activities should be stopped on the basis that they are wrong, unfounded, unconstitutional, and go against the very orders and directives that the NSA has been given. The National Security Agency, or NSA for short, is a governmental institution; home to the government’s code breakers and code makers, it is dedicated to the delivery of critical information to the government and its agencies. This agency also provides

NSA Surveillance Essay

2624 words - 11 pages valuable companies the world has ever seen, in terms of both money and data they have access to. The NSA also ran other programs and claims that these efforts are to prevent future terrorist attacks; the programs are to protect the nation. However, the legality of their actions are questionable at best. Ultimately, this is a question of privacy vs security. Unfortunately for the NSA, privacy matters in this situation due to the vagueness and

The Surveilance Program

2505 words - 10 pages is: ineffective, becoming a threat to the country, and unconstitutional. PRISM has never met its target goal ever since it was established and what it is doing to irrelevant to national security. It only has gathered the metadata just to spy on the US citizens instead of spying on foreign threats to the Nation. Metadata is the telephone record NSA has forced Verizon to hand in to them which includes who’s on the call, location, and the duration

Governmant Monitoring

2026 words - 9 pages the NSA program is "inconsistent with the fourth amendment." “American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit against the NSA claiming that the surveillance of American’s phone calls is unconstitutional.”(C). (FOOTNOTE.) On the other hand, the program is based on Section 215 of the Patriot Act which allows the government to legally obtain records that are "relevant to an ongoing terrorism investigation." While this seems to authorize it

The National Security Agency

1486 words - 6 pages NSA has, the President is likely to make wrong decisions risking the safety of Americans. So the greater the bulk of information the better decision would be forthcoming. It would not be wise to decrease the power of the NSA, doing so would encourage the individuals or groups that mean harm to Americans. Liberty and security are inversely proportional. Extra security always comes at the expense of liberty. To protect privacy, to reduce discomfort

Government Surveillance Makes U.S. Citizens Uncomfortable

897 words - 4 pages people, then citizens should be obligated to do so. Some people argue that the NSA’s use of metadata collection is unconstitutional, and violates the Fourth Amendment. The Constitution only protects against “unreasonable” searches without probable cause (US Const. amend. IV.). In order to authorize a search on a particular individual, NSA analysts need to have a reasonable suspicion that there is a connection to a foreign terrorist organization

Mass Surveillance and Its Role in Promoting National Security

1622 words - 7 pages these data sweeps “unconstitutional” and “useless” (End The Phone Data Sweeps) because of their supposed invasion of privacy and lack of pertinent results. Despite these claims, it is clear that the protection of national security is undoubtedly worth the sacrifice of personal privacy by the people of the Untied States. Because all US citizens are protected by the Constitution, many have turned to the authority of the Bill of Rights in attempt

Cyber Security and Surveillance: Bulk Data and Metdata

948 words - 4 pages and the digital information reliance are developing faster than the laws. Not to mention how it was possible to reveal (alleged) surveillance on Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel. In late January, the U.S. government privacy board said NSA bulk collection of phone data is illegal due to lack of necessity, no disclosure of success, and dubious legality. In December, a federal judge said that he believes the government’s collection of domestic

Digital Privacy Concerns

1682 words - 7 pages disproportionate surveillance by the US. Furthermore, the intentions of the NSA still remain unclear; why is the collection and the extended retention of this data useful? Those in power believe that the collection of this information allows them to preempt terrorist attacks; a very difficult claim to prove. Our lack of clear answers demonstrate the need for a larger audience who support government transparency. The NSA’s misconduct has dealt

The Patriot Act is Unconstitutional

2885 words - 12 pages The Patriot Act was established after the tragedy of September, 11, 2001 in a moment of weakness. It gave unprecedented and unnecessary powers to intelligence agencies under the wide umbrella of national security. The Patriot Act has used an “us vs them” mentality as well as pro-American propaganda to accomplish its goals. This new authority of the intelligence agencies has gone too far, is unjustified, unconstitutional, and

Critical Review of, “Enemy of the State”

1865 words - 8 pages In the following critical review of, “Enemy of the State” I will be addressing the obvious issue of the government’s infringement upon the privacy of United States citizens by the National Security Agency (NSA). However, before I do so, I would like to begin by outlining some initial pieces of information that is imperative for setting the context in which I will be viewing this issue of privacy invasion. I will begin by first giving a brief

Similar Essays

The National Security Agency And The Surveillance Scandal

1237 words - 5 pages surveillance data and privacy violations taking place throughout the U.S. and other parts of the country. The first program revealed was PRISM, which is a clandestine mass electronic surveillance data mining program. Launched in 2007 by the NSA, PRISM is a government code name for a data-collection effort known officially by the Signal Intelligence Activity Designator (SIGAD) US-984XN. The PRISM program collects stored internet communications made

Is The National Security Agency Taking It Too Far?

1664 words - 7 pages ? Also, there is not too much credibility too them stopping these 54 plots. Out of all the people the NSA monitors there have still been a fair amount of terrorist attacks and perhaps if they changed tactics more of these terrorists or threats could be stopped. In the NSA’S defense, not one United States citizen has called them out as being violating and/or unconstitutional, yet. Along with that no citizen has been harmed by the surveillance of

No Such Agency Essay

1735 words - 7 pages itself does not allow this surveillance program, but the FISA allows for this activity if and when an additional law later on authorizes it, which is the Authorization for Use of Military Force Act (United States, U.S. Department of Justice 3). If, in fact, the FISA did restrict the President from authorizing NSA surveillance activities, FISA would be unconstitutional as it would contradict the President’s constitutional authority (Untied States

The National Security Agency Essay

1687 words - 7 pages Force Act (United States, U.S. Department of Justice 3). If, in fact, the FISA did restrict the President from authorizing the NSA surveillance activities, FISA would be unconstitutional as it would contradict the President’s constitutional authority (Untied States 3). The NSA directs most of its surveillance program to foreign intelligence. The NSA will only target calls where at least one of the parties is outside of the U.S. (United States, U.S