This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nuclear Deterrence Is The Best Defense Against Nuclear War

1240 words - 5 pages

Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War

In 1945, a great technological innovation was dropped over Japan, the atomic bomb. Ever since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world has faced the threat of nuclear attack. In reaction to this, world governments have been forced to find a defense against nuclear attack. One solution to the danger of nuclear attack is the use of nuclear deterrence. Nuclear deterrence is the possession and launching of nuclear weapons for the sole purpose of defense and retaliation against a nuclear attack from another country. Nuclear deterrence is the best answer to the danger of nuclear war, resulting in world security and the prevention of nuclear war. However, some people believe that the possession of nuclear weapons for deterrence is unnecessary, expensive and too risky.

International security may be at risk with deterrent nukes waiting to be fired at any moments notice. An accident could create a misfire hurting millions of people. A computer could have an error either launching a missile or reporting incoming missiles. If an incoming missile were reported, tracking stations would be instantly contacted to verify the report. The situation is determined in only one minute and a half (Hartinger). The chance of a nuclear weapon accidentally being fired is very unlikely. At nuclear command centers, there are no buttons to accidentally push or chances of computer errors (Walsh 45). An accident cannot occur because only a person can sequence a launch. The President is the only man who can initiate a nuclear launch in the United States. After the Presidents decision, there is a complex procedure of authorization codes and key turning to finally launch the nuclear weapon ("USSTRATCOM . . . "). Only the people who control nuclear weapons, not accidents, threaten world security.
There is a huge expense in maintaining and building the nuclear arms that we use for deterrence. Nuclear information is secret, taking great amounts of money and time, to research and keep it confidential. Power is gained from the research and development, which is definitely worth the expense. The great amounts of money spent on nuclear technology help ensure the security of the people of the United States. It takes huge amounts of money to have the edge in nuclear technology. However, nuclear deterrence is even cheaper than war. The cost of building, operating, and maintaining nuclear weapons is only $26.7 billion per year (Hellman). "This is significantly less than the cost of the 1991 [Persian Gulf] war, which came to nearly $80 billion" (Dobbs). Deterrence is economically and politically intelligent.

The Cold War is over and some people believe that we do not need nuclear deterrence anymore. The U.S.S.R has fallen and Russia poses little threat to launch a nuclear attack on the United States. Because of this, Russia and the United States have begun disarming their nuclear weapons. The United States...

Find Another Essay On Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War

Russian Strategic Submarine Force – Nuclear Deterrence with Uncertainty

766 words - 3 pages their place in the Russian strategic triad early in the Cold War, yet today their operational readiness (and role as a deterrent) appears threatened – from their own nation. Building, operating and maintaining a mission-ready SSBN force is an immensely expensive commitment. First, if national leadership relies on nuclear deterrence as a maxim of their national security strategy, they need to back that with shrewd decision-making and enforce

Nuclear Weapon Funding in US Defense Budget

2509 words - 10 pages thing at all. If we know this why don’t we get rid them? The reason we haven’t is because once nuclear power was invented there was no way to get rid of it. Even prevention hasn’t yet helped. The U.S. is a big in preventing nuclear weapons, or so we think. The U.S. is not in war with other countries, they are in a war for nuclear deterrence. Should the U.S. Congress amend the D.O.D. Appropriations Act of 2015 to eliminate funding for

Nuclear Weapons and Their Importance to Modern Defense

1691 words - 7 pages in any way possible, which means that nuclear weapons are the better choice over conventional missile systems. The author of the article best classified non-nuclear missile defense by stating this, “Missile defenses and conventional strike capabilities, then, are a cushion; nuclear deterrence is the foundation” (Colby). This sums up the best possible defense against nuclear threats, conventional weapons and missile defense systems serving as extra

Is Nuclear War a Possibility

1669 words - 7 pages weapons have been used in warfare, and it is unlikely that a repeated or larger attack would happen in warfare in the future because of this strong essence of deterrence. The USA's nuclear arsenal deters countries from declaring war directly on them, as they fear a larger and more devastating counter-attack that could be capable of wiping out populations in a matter of days.This fear could be responsible for countries such as the former Soviet

Nuclear War

664 words - 3 pages protection against other countries.When Nuclear weapons are put to the test they create an enormous impact on the worlds surroundings. During World War II, a nuclear bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, which caused the worlds weather patterns to change for almost ten years. Along with the weather the plant live did not start to grow for over two tears after the bomb was dropped. To the few unlucky people of Japan that experienced the full force of the

Nuclear war

844 words - 4 pages Once it was known that a nuclear war was inevitable, the war council began crunching the numbers to see how many would survive in our fallout shelter. It was determined that only 6 out of the 12 suitable to live on will be chosen. It is with heavy heart that they must choose the best 6 to live, and condemn the leftover 6 to die. The war council chose the 36 Year-old female physician, the third year medical student, the 16 year-old pregnant

War in the Nuclear Era

2779 words - 11 pages Addressing the question of whether war is a rational decision or a mistake is important to understand the causes of war and explain the reduction in the number of wars fought among countries in today’s nuclear era. The argument, under which war is a mistake, is a normative claim about what action states should have chosen, based on the outcomes that have been produced. That is, for a decision to be good, it needs to have produced the actor’s

The Nuclear Inventions During the Cold War

1025 words - 4 pages that they have been producing. For thirteen days, the United States and the Soviet Union were on high alert; the Cold War almost turned “hot”. Perhaps the fear stems from the fact that there is no defense against nuclear attacks. If the missiles placed in Cuba were to be fired, Florida would have had no defense. There is nothing that could stop a powerful missile launching its attack on a set destination. Eventually, diplomatic figures made

The threat of accidental nuclear war

886 words - 4 pages USA's information is more readilyavailable than the other nuclear equipped countries.'Accidental nuclear war' is a term for a very broad subject, withhard to define boundaries. Technical errors, miscalculations andunintended escalation can all lead to inadvertent nuclear war.In the 1950's a flock of geese was mistaken for a squadron ofRussian bombers, and in 1960 a radar beam reflecting off the moonduplicated a Soviet ICBM (Inter-Continental

War and Nuclear Weapons

1052 words - 5 pages countries have the resources and capabilities to make their own nuclear weapons programs. Another issue today is the war between India and Pakistan over the country of Kashmir. This never-ending conflict has shown capabilities of turning into an all-out nuclear war. Today countries and people in general are trying their best to ban nuclear weapons from everywhere. Biological weapons, chemical weapons, land mines, and cluster munitions have all been

War: Nuclear Power

1292 words - 5 pages core. It caused an explosion of 20 kilotons, or 20,000 tons of TNT, and killed 60,000 to 80,000 people. This second attack really sent the message to Japan, and they finally surrendered on August 15, 1945. World War II was finally over, but the Cold War began with the reveal of the United States’ nuclear power. It is believed that dropping the bombs saved both Japanese and American lives by ending the war quickly without any battles, but

Similar Essays

Post Cold Wat Nuclear Deterrence Essay

2227 words - 9 pages Post-Cold War: US Nuclear Deterrence "The current questioning of nuclear deterrence implies something other than it's withering away. There is no post nuclear strategy"¦The nuclear instrument remains the central element in the defense of the nuclear powers." -Anonymous French analyst For the citizens of the United States nuclear arms in the post-cold war era are no longer looked upon as deterrents from war, rather, they are nothing more

Nuclear Deterrence: A Case Study Of The India Pakistan Conflict

1555 words - 7 pages Development of Nuclear Capabilities The main dissertation of the paper seeks to answer the validity and the credibility of the issue of nuclear deterrence in the case of the conflict between India and Pakistan. It is perplexing and difficult to comprehend that these two countries are both archrivals and nuclear powers but still so far they have been able to avert a full-scale nuclear war among themselves. This creates the need to understand

Nuclear Deterrence: A Flawed Theory English Essay

2295 words - 10 pages stalemate known as mutual deterrence. This mutual deterrence was heightened with the advent of France, China, and the U.K. developing their own nuclear weapons. MAD, or mutual assured destruction, was the reason that countries refrained from attacking each other and is still a key theory in the defense policies of the United States and Russia. As the number of nuclear weapons of these countries increased, the threat of a nuclear world war escalated

Which Method Is The Best To Solve Nuclear Waste Disposal Problem?

987 words - 4 pages can be stolen by terrorist and transformed into nuclear weapon (Marvin Schaffer). In order to provide people maximum protection, spent nuclear fuel should be safely distracted or stored in controlled repository. Difficulties of radioactive waste disposal are that these materials have significantly long half-life of radiation which will not end after 100,000 years (Michelle Ragheb). The idea of this project is to find the best solution to the