Nuclear Limitations And Disarmament Essay

983 words - 4 pages

Nuclear Limitations and Disarmament

When a lone B-29 flew over Hiroshima on August 29, 1945, the first nuclear weapon changed the course of international trust and relations. From that point on, countries tried to control each other with building and stockpiling superior nuclear arms. The question of nuclear limitations and of nuclear disarmament finally came under world review. The idea of one country possessing enough firepower to destroy the world is thoughtprovoking, but a look at the nuclear proponents brings up several good points. The concept of a world free of nuclear energy and weapons would shock most people. Nuclear power has existed for quite some time and has provided valuable services. If the structure of nuclear programs, weapons, research, and power plants, was removed, the world would be thrown into a state of political and economic imbalance. The failure of the five nuclear countries, U.S., Russia, Britain, France, and China, to remain vigilant in their threat of nuclear power would cause third world countries to challenge the position of the five countries and bully their foes. The thought of nuclear disarmament is useless. Stability of peace, power, and trust are results of competition in the nuclear arms race of the two most powerful nuclear countries.
The coalition of trust between countries considered to be a superpower by showing economic and militaristic power has kept other less powerful countries from acting rashly or blindly. Such was the case with Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait. The severe involvement of the U.S. and the minimal involvement by the U.N.’s posed a serious threat to the Iraq’s well-being. If Iraq provoked the U.S. enough, we might have turned to nuclear arms and solved the matter conclusively. By having nuclear presence in the world with two or more superpower countries, they can combat the threat of dictatorship and its expansion, instead of having a single indecisive group such as the U.N. controlling the arms. This structure allows for third world nations to develop, but in the way that they should be developing: raising the standards of living and advancing the general welfare of the people. If a third world country decides to develop a nuclear bomb, then that country would be putting a strain on the trust between the two ruling nuclear superpowers. One superpower will strongly disapproves, while the other power would choose the new nuclear country as another member of their “team”. Then the trust of cease fire comes into play, because the new nuclear country might decide to attack, and if given new weapons or more powerful ones, then that could lead into world wide war.
The equal destructive capability between Russia and the U.S. during the cold war prevented each from firing at one another. Many times the U.S....

Find Another Essay On Nuclear Limitations and Disarmament

India and Pakistan: a modern history of the antagonistic relationship between nuclear neighbors and what it could mean for the future of the free world.

3218 words - 13 pages States' policy goals are not revolutionary. The most important goal is to encourage stability in South Asia. The government also aims to get bilateral relations with both countries back on track, and foster economic growth and development through trade and investment. Finally, they would like to safeguard both national and global interests in nuclear nonproliferation and the disarmament process and restore the pre-test momentum of the movement.One

Nuclear Disarmament Essay

1213 words - 5 pages United States, Indonesia will not change its position on nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear technoogy (Lieggi). Actions taken by your government with regard to the issue In 1970, Indonesia signed the Treaty on the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), and in 1996, acceded to the Additional Protocol. This treaty is about nuclear disarmament, nonproliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear technoogy. In 1996

The United States Road Map to World Peace and Security

1100 words - 4 pages action must be conveyed and acted upon by the rest of the UN members to be effectively enforceable. According to Jennifer Weeks, who wrote an article about the message delivered by President Barack Obama to the United Nations Assembly. For the first time in the history of the United States, President Barack Obama pledged to work with other nuclear nations for a serious nuclear disarmament program calling for a tighter nuclear arms reduction

International Law

1207 words - 5 pages Nonproliferation Treaty agreement relies on three pillars: 1) nonproliferation, 2) disarmament, and 3) peaceful use of nuclear energy (Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, 2010). Nonproliferation concentrates on the transfer of nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosives. The NPT and larger nonproliferation government are not static. Over the past 40 years the regime has tackled and adapted itself to address many challenges. Despite

The Significance of the Cuban Missile Crisis

2160 words - 9 pages started during Cold war (“Arms Control and Disarmament”1). The first action limiting nuclear weapons was the Limited Test Ban in 1963. This ban limited testing of nuclear weapons. This ban led to many more bans, that all had a goal of limiting the possibility of a nuclear war. The Threshold test ban limits testing to the equivalent of 150,000 tons of TNT, but countries could still make larger bombs. The Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty, called an


1913 words - 8 pages -reliance. This convinced most of population that they could meet the challenges of nuclear war and overcome them. This was also used in Britain however some people responded to this by creating groups for such as the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. Some responded to the threat of nuclear war with protesting saying that civil defence activities were just a device to convince the general public that nuclear war could be survived. This created a

Nuclear Weapons

940 words - 4 pages 61 nation conference on Disarmament again failed to produce an agreed treaty before breaking up. Negotiators will return again to produce another final effort for a test ban treaty in 1996.After 18 months of talks, the proposed treaty text bans all nuclear tests, no matter the size or purpose. Still unresolved is whether ratification by the three nuclear powers of India, Pakistan, and Israel should be required before the treaty enters the force

Christianity and Acceptance of Conventional and Nuclear War

840 words - 3 pages stop it, as suggest from Mark 11:15-18 but nuclear war should not take place since it is no different form terrorists. In Romans 12:9-21, it says that any evil sins and violence should be left to God to be punished rather than using violent to solve it, this means nuclear war and any other type of violent should not take place in any ways. Nuclear disarmament in different nations is encouraged by Christians as they are

Should Canada ratify the NPT?

1452 words - 6 pages commitment from the [NNWS] not to develop or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons...the NPT nuclear weapons states promised unfettered access to peaceful nuclear technologies, and pledged to engage in disarmament negotiations aimed at the ultimate elimination of their nuclear arsenals.#Even without further examination of this "basic bargain", it is clear that there is a certain unfairness in the very basis of the agreement. To stipulate that certain

The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

1524 words - 6 pages Introduction The emergence of nuclear weapons was brought about by distrust amongst states, following progress in nuclear research into uranium fission. Fearing that Germany would create a nuclear weapon first, the United States employed vast resources into nuclear research and developing the first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union followed by testing its first atomic bomb in 1949, thereby beginning a nuclear arms race amongst countries that

Does the Non-State actor represent a new challenge to nuclear proliferation?

865 words - 3 pages [Type text] Does the Non-State actor represent a new challenge to nuclear proliferation?Non-state actor is a term widely used to mean any actor that is not a government (Willetts, 2005:426). Important non-state actors in international relations include: Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Firms and businesses, especially multinational corporations (MNCs), International organized crime and drug groups and International paramilitary and

Similar Essays

Practicality Of Disarmament. Essay

3866 words - 15 pages than to regulating and giving up of their own armaments. Hence India did not sign this treaty, which was one-sided. In-spite of all this limitations, this treaty succeeded from barring nuclear weapons from 70% of the earth's surface, which was a significant contribution towards disarmament efforts.2) Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT)Strategic Arms Limitation Talks took place between U.S.A and the Soviet Union on May 1972. The aim of these

Disarmament:Good Or Bad? Essay

1233 words - 5 pages . After all of this if someone has survived that then they have to deal with the radiation poisoning(Harris). Also today about 10 counties have nuclear arms. These countries include the U.S.A, Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Isriel and Pakistan("Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What?"). disarmament of the United Stated isn't a good idea because it is dangerous, isn't wise, and the govenment needs to protect its citizens

After The Atomic Bomb Essay

2536 words - 10 pages entirely resolve the global nuclear threat, they moved the two world powers towards progressive disarmament. In 1982 the United States and the Soviet Union started a new round of negotiations called the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) (1). Additional limitations were included in both START talks (1). Once the iron curtain fell and the Soviet Union disintegrated, Russia would be removed of its nuclear weapons and the nuclear conflict was

Nayarit Conference On The Humanitarian Impact Of Nuclear Weapons

1600 words - 6 pages weapons” is now needed. Furthermore, Zambia made a strong appeal for a ban on the use, production, and stockpiling of nuclear weapons, saying that a comprehensive ban had “gained grip” in the international system over the past couple of years. A ban is the preferred first step towards the elimination of nuclear weapons, it said. The idea of multilateral nuclear disarmament is as old as the bomb itself and its survivors who either have experienced