Nuclear Limitations and Disarmament
When a lone B-29 flew over Hiroshima on August 29, 1945, the first nuclear weapon changed the course of international trust and relations. From that point on, countries tried to control each other with building and stockpiling superior nuclear arms. The question of nuclear limitations and of nuclear disarmament finally came under world review. The idea of one country possessing enough firepower to destroy the world is thoughtprovoking, but a look at the nuclear proponents brings up several good points. The concept of a world free of nuclear energy and weapons would shock most people. Nuclear power has existed for quite some time and has provided valuable services. If the structure of nuclear programs, weapons, research, and power plants, was removed, the world would be thrown into a state of political and economic imbalance. The failure of the five nuclear countries, U.S., Russia, Britain, France, and China, to remain vigilant in their threat of nuclear power would cause third world countries to challenge the position of the five countries and bully their foes. The thought of nuclear disarmament is useless. Stability of peace, power, and trust are results of competition in the nuclear arms race of the two most powerful nuclear countries.
The coalition of trust between countries considered to be a superpower by showing economic and militaristic power has kept other less powerful countries from acting rashly or blindly. Such was the case with Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait. The severe involvement of the U.S. and the minimal involvement by the U.N.’s posed a serious threat to the Iraq’s well-being. If Iraq provoked the U.S. enough, we might have turned to nuclear arms and solved the matter conclusively. By having nuclear presence in the world with two or more superpower countries, they can combat the threat of dictatorship and its expansion, instead of having a single indecisive group such as the U.N. controlling the arms. This structure allows for third world nations to develop, but in the way that they should be developing: raising the standards of living and advancing the general welfare of the people. If a third world country decides to develop a nuclear bomb, then that country would be putting a strain on the trust between the two ruling nuclear superpowers. One superpower will strongly disapproves, while the other power would choose the new nuclear country as another member of their “team”. Then the trust of cease fire comes into play, because the new nuclear country might decide to attack, and if given new weapons or more powerful ones, then that could lead into world wide war.
The equal destructive capability between Russia and the U.S. during the cold war prevented each from firing at one another. Many times the U.S....