This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Nuclear Proliferation And U.S. Grand Strategy

1486 words - 6 pages

Neo-isolationists embrace a constricted view of U.S. national interest: national security and defense –the protection of the security, liberty, and property of the American people –is the only vital U.S. interest. Given to the narrow interest, the U.S. should end alliances with Europe and Asia. It can maintain nuclear forces required to deter nuclear attacks, and also adequate conventional forces. They both will be effective even against a Eurasian hegemon. Neo-isolationists argue that the U.S. is inherently a very secure country and is strategically immune, and that nuclear proliferation is not our problem because it is not necessarily bad as someone claims; rather, some proliferation will even be good.
First of all, nuclear proliferation is not necessarily bad because nuclear weapon can reduce the possibility of war by two means: first, by enhancing deterrent capabilities; and second, by providing security.
On one hand, nuclear weapons can enhance deterrent capabilities thus reduce likelihood of war. Nuclear weapons are good at deterrence. When evaluating the credibility of nuclear deterrence, two factors need to be considered: the state’s capabilities to use t and the state’s will and interests to use them. Deterrence is most likely to succeed when a state have the military capabilities and greater will and interests to use nuclear weapons. The will and interests of the attacked state in using nuclear weapons can be presumed to be stronger than that of the attacker because the attacked will strive to retaliate in order to preserve its own territory and security. The U.S. has the strongest nuclear weapon capabilities in the world. Were it attacked, it would have greater will and interests to use the nuclear weapons than the attacker would have, and no states in the world can survive U.S. nuclear retaliation because we have the largest number of nuclear warheads. Knowing this, since the state is unitary rational actor, the would-be attacker will be inhibited, and the U.S. would be secure. In other words, U.S. nuclear retaliatory capabilities are effective deterrence against even determined adversaries, including potential Eurasia hegemon like China or Russia which is less threatening now compared with China, let alone the weaker nuclear states with small number of nuclear weapons. There can be no politically rational state large or small to explode a nuclear bomb on America because U.S. retaliation would be devastating. Besides, Britain, France, PRC and Russia have nuclear retaliatory forces, and this makes it quite likely that these powers will deter each other, further reducing the risk that an ambitious Eurasia hegemon would dominate and military exploit the economic resources of the Eurasian landmass.
On the other hand, nuclear weapons reduce the possibility of war by providing security. One of the reasons for a state to get nuclear weapons is security consideration. Since nuclear weapons are good deterrent weapons, states would like to...

Find Another Essay On Nuclear Proliferation and U.S. Grand Strategy

Nuclear Proliferation Essay

923 words - 4 pages Pakistan’s nuclear bomb also revealed that he was selling nuclear weapons technology to Libya and other rogue states at the current time. President Bush dedicated much of his time and thought process as president on how to eliminate the threat of nuclear proliferation. He stated that anyone that takes part in nuclear proliferation will be found and stopped, and that the U.S. will not rest until this threat has been vanquished. During the bush

The Non-Proliferation Treaty: Reasons For Its Failiures And Suggestions For Its Improvement And Strenghtening

3997 words - 16 pages dramatically, which can be blamed most ardently for the NPT regime failures. At the end of 2001, the United States formulated a new strategy in regards to nuclear weapons which "systematically undercut the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty..." With its actions and voiced intentions, the United States is not only undercutting international standards and law but also contributing to nuclear proliferation around the world.The new Nuclear Posture

Does the Non-State actor represent a new challenge to nuclear proliferation?

865 words - 3 pages [Type text] Does the Non-State actor represent a new challenge to nuclear proliferation?Non-state actor is a term widely used to mean any actor that is not a government (Willetts, 2005:426). Important non-state actors in international relations include: Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Firms and businesses, especially multinational corporations (MNCs), International organized crime and drug groups and International paramilitary and

The United States Road Map to World Peace and Security

1100 words - 4 pages , end to nuclear testing, better international treaties on nuclear non-proliferation, and plan to put away nuclear weapons from the hands of the terrorists. The President said for the year 2010, the U.S. Defense Department will cut back budget for nuclear funding in the amount of $50 billion per year, which can be diverted in other critical programs of the United States (815). The United Nations have sought long for a nuclear-free world and now

The Nuclear Posture Review: The Wrong Road to Security

3249 words - 13 pages This paper is a critical analysis and a personal refutation of the contemporary nuclear weapons policies and strategies of the United States of America as laid out in the Congress mandated Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). The NPR is a set of recommendations on the future enhancements to American security by reorganizing and reinventing nuclear strategy to better enforce non-proliferation of NBC weapons by rouge states seen as the most likely

Nuclear Weapons and Their Importance to Modern Defense

1691 words - 7 pages the role of nuclear weapons in the twenty first century. The article recommends a dual strategy of deterring rogue states that are likely to become nuclear threats and using much less threatening proliferation prevention methods to deal with nations that could become allies; it also suggests that the test moratorium be ended so that research and testing can be done to ensure a safe and effective nuclear arsenal, funding should also be provided

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Within the International Arena

1825 words - 7 pages Nuclear Non-Proliferation within the International Arena: An assessment on major solutions from both a realist and liberal perspective As defined by Christoph Bluth from the Political Studies Association, the proliferation of nuclear weapons is “widely perceived by political leaders as one of the major problems of global security in the contemporary era” (Bluth, 2012). This is clear by the catalog of concern and actions taken by governments

Controling the Spread of Nuclear Weapons

919 words - 4 pages eliminate nuclear weapons elsewhere. Treaties such as the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaties I and II, and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty were some of the first major building blocks of the arms control and disarmament regime, particularly concerning nuclear proliferation. This regime was initially put in place by the world’s major powers as an effort to maintain the status quo and have only 5 countries with

Document Analysis of “A World Free of Nuclear Weapons” - Brown - HIST0276 - Essay

3494 words - 14 pages context to the problem of proliferation paints the image of the precarious situation the world is in, and sets the stage for an argument for nuclear disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation. Then, the document presents the question of whether or not the nuclear nations, given that new nuclear states are lacking in experience of handling weapons of mass destruction, and the world be as fortunate as the U.S. and the Soviets were during the Cold War in

Iran: A Policy to Eliminate the Nuclear Threat

1639 words - 7 pages In recent years, it has become a growing concern of the global community that Iran’s nuclear aspirations are threatening rather than peaceful. Under the Nuclear Non- proliferation Treaty, Iran has agreed to abide by the three treaty pillars, which include “nuclear nonproliferation, disarmament, and the peaceful use of nuclear technology” ("Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty." n.d., para. 1). With evidence of efforts to enrich uranium as well as

The Discontinuation of Nuclear Weaponry Creation

2076 words - 9 pages As Thomas Jefferson once stated, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government”. Have political leaders thrown aside this advice in their pursuit of nuclear arms proliferation? Since 1945, many world leaders have established forms of defense known as nuclear weapons that have the technology and capability to completely annihilate designated regions of the earth. Originally a

Similar Essays

Iran And Nuclear Proliferation Essay

1976 words - 8 pages Iran and Nuclear Proliferation On February 11th, 2010, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared during a speech on the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, that Iran has produced its first package of highly enriched Uranium. This was declared two days after beginning the process earlier that week. President Ahmadinejad said during his speech that Iran has succeeded in enriching uranium to twenty percent and has the ability to achieve a

International Institutions And Nuclear Proliferation: The Dependence On Nations

2895 words - 12 pages Iranian case. Works Cited “Status of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, [online], accessed November 5, 2013, Helen M. Cousineau, “The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Global Non-Proliferation Regime: A U.S. Policy Agenda,” Boston University International Law Journal, 12 (2) (1994): 415. Jorge Morales Pedraza

What Was The Grand Strategy Of The Roman Empire Before The 3rd Century Collapse? What Reforms Began And How Did They Change Roman Grand Strategy, Tactics, And Military Organization?

1006 words - 4 pages Entering the Third Century, the Roman Empire, under Hadrian, executed its grand strategy based on the simple concept of perimeter defense. This perimeter defense consisted of legions stationed within fortresses on the Roman frontier, and some were even accompanied by large stone walls (the most famous being that of Hadrian's Wall in North England). Another factor that made it easy for the Romans to adopt this type of perimeter defense strategy

Nuclear Proliferation And Tension On The Korean Peninsula

1329 words - 6 pages The US should unofficially help South Korea build nuclear missiles and place them at the North Korean border. The US should treat them like they treat Israel’s and pretend they don’t exist. We will send American engineers and workers over to South Korea to help build them and tell the public and the world that it is to help build infrastructure. It will be revenue for American companies and workers while simultaneously protecting South Korea. If