Nuclear Terrorism Not Likely Essay

1899 words - 8 pages

    Abstract:  Now that the Cold War is over, both the United States and the former Soviet Republics are dismantling their nuclear arsenals. Because of a less than reliable system of nuclear security in Russia, the chances of terrorists group obtaining uranium or plutonium from Russia have increased. However, in order to assemble the nuclear weapon, the group would need both knowledge and all the necessary materials. Thus, a nuclear threat by a terrorist is possible but not very likely.


Nuclear Terrorism:


During the 1980s, the world often watched and wondered what would and could occur between the two super power nations, the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. During the Cold War, both countries produced mass amounts of nuclear weapons. During this period, the U.S. amassed around 18,000 nuclear warheads. The Soviet Union was able to build its supply of nuclear weapons into the tens of thousands during the peak of the Cold War.


However, the world is now living in the 1990s, and the Cold War is over. Because of this, both countries began to pursue a policy of rapid nuclear disarmament. This reduction in arms is due to the START Treaties of 1991 and 1993 which were both signed by the former super powers. These treaties insured that both the United States and the former Soviet republics would be dismantling thousands of nuclear weapons every year. The U.S. has cut its number of deployed warheads to around 8,500, a reduction of nearly 10,000 nuclear warheads. Meanwhile, the former Soviet Republics will be dismantling between two and three thousand nuclear warheads a year for many years into the next century.


However, there is a great irony within this whole situation. While the disarmament policies and actions are making the world a safer place to live, the possibility of nuclear terrorism has increased greatly because of the reduction of nuclear weapons by the U.S. and the former Soviet republics. This is because the nuclear weapons are dismantled into the basic components, the most potentially dangerous piece being the uranium or plutonium center that fuels the nuclear explosion. These materials are now more readily available to terrorist groups than ever before because of lax security in Russia and the other former Soviet republics.


To understand the problem these nuclear fuels present, certain clarifications need to made. There are many different grades of plutonium and uranium. Most grades, (known as reactor grades) are usable in nuclear reactors. However, in order for plutonium or uranium to be used in a nuclear weapon, they need to be in a very high grade (often referred to as bomb grade). In its high grade form, uranium is known as uranium 235 or highly-enriched uranium (HEU). Plutonium is known as plutonium 239 when it is bomb grade. Both elements rarely occur in the bomb grade form. In fact, only 0.7% of uranium that is formed naturally is bomb grade. The other...

Find Another Essay On Nuclear Terrorism Not Likely

Reaons to Abolish Nuclear Weapons Essay

1565 words - 6 pages weapons is necessary if we are to live on without worry and in peace, for it is like a virus that could likely end up wiping us out unless it is eliminated. Works Cited Cooper, Mary H. “Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism.” CQ Researcher 2 Apr. 2004: 297-320. Web. 6 Nov. 2013. Glasstone, Samuel, and Philip J. Dolan. The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. Washington: U.S. Dept. of Defense, 1977. Print. Griffin, Rodman D. "Nuclear

Post Cold Wat Nuclear Deterrence Essay

2227 words - 9 pages punishment, fear of defeat, or fear of an undefined negative consequence (Hopkins 1). Fear is essential in deterrence and it is most likely to hold when the costs and risks of war are far too great for a nation to bear. As a result, nuclear weapons are a powerful force for peace (Hopkins 1). War is less likely to occur when the prospect is so dangerous. As weapons of mass destruction, which produce horrific devastation, nuclear arms are considered to

Terrorist Organizations Worldwide

1406 words - 6 pages every country will have massive stockpiles of weapons, be they nuclear or not, and most countries are against using nuclear weapons, it is much more likely that terrorist attacks and biological warfare will be used. Thus, terrorism will be used much more widespread than they are presently. In reaction to this, security in all public and private buildings should be greatly increased. However, security will never be able to reach the point where

Challenges for US Counter-terrorism Efforts

1269 words - 5 pages USS Cole bombings illustrate, - terrorism is not limited to those areas where we are prepared for it.   Some have suggested that policy planners need to incorporate factors relating to the impact of terrorist incidents or campaigns, not only into the domestic policy equation, but also into the foreign and defense policy equations. Some view mechanisms similar to the Defense Department's [DoD's] "Quadrennial Defense Review " as providing

Nuclear Energy and Hydroelectric Energy: Pros and Cons

2325 words - 9 pages that could make it less viable than other energy sources, even though it has an extremely high longevity. Terrorism is a big threat to not only the acceptance and usage of nuclear energy, but also to the public as well. If terrorists were to get ahold of nuclear waste or fuel, they could weaponize it and use it in an act of terror incomparable to anything the world has ever seen before. The terrorists would not even need to weaponize spent

The Nuclear Terrorism Threat and the Aum Shinrikyo Cult

6380 words - 26 pages handling due to the use of reactor-grade plutonium are not substantially greater than for the use of weapons-grade material. In fact, the US successfully detonated a non-weapon grade plutonium bomb in a nuclear test in 1960.15 The possibility for reactor-grade plutonium to be used in nuclear weapons has drastic implications for the potential of nuclear terrorism, since there are increasingly large amounts of reactor-grade (or "weapons-usable") plutonium

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Within the International Arena

1825 words - 7 pages less likely to completely abide by nuclear non-proliferation. This is because powerful states tend to make decisions that benefit their state first, according to the realist view. When the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was ratified in 1968 (and later permanent in 1995) it was met with strong realist critique (Magnarella, 2008). Strong opposition was met from less militarily powerful states such as India, Israel and Pakistan. These nations

The United States Road Map to World Peace and Security

1100 words - 4 pages The United States after dropping the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan that resulted to over two hundred thousand casualties over sixty years ago have promised not to use the same weapon again against a non-nuclear sovereign state. The fear that nuclear weapons will be used again in war culminated the establishment of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that was originally signed by the five big nuclear states, namely United States

Resilience in the Face of Terrorism

2313 words - 9 pages sometimes difficult to detect (Mauroni, 2010). For example, terrorist were able to use American planes to attack the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and U.S. Airlines Flight 93. Although rare, the threat of a CBRN attack may cause more fear in Americans than traditional weapons because they can be undetectable, cause massive damage, and result in mass casualties (Mauroni, 2010). Chemical Terrorist Attacks Chemical terrorism is not likely to be


1429 words - 6 pages potential hazard the situation could cause. When looking at the many functions of the DHS, nothing could be more important than the ability to understand or hinder or stop an attack man made or not. First Homeland Security studies the nature of the risk; this means that they study what is likely to happen in a certain situation. The texted explains risk as what can go wrong. A cigarette smoker takes a risk every time he lights up, and everyone

Nuclear Nightmares: Where Do We Go From Here?

1003 words - 4 pages radioactive material than could be used for weapons, it is close to impossible to account for every pound that has been produced. The Russian government, however, is reluctant to admit this. They have a certain "lack of acceptance" within the government that "their material is not adequately secured and that there is a relationship between terrorism and these materials." As anyone can see, why else would someone want to steal nuclear material other

Similar Essays

Does The Non State Actor Represent A New Challenge To Nuclear Proliferation?

865 words - 3 pages [Type text] Does the Non-State actor represent a new challenge to nuclear proliferation?Non-state actor is a term widely used to mean any actor that is not a government (Willetts, 2005:426). Important non-state actors in international relations include: Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Firms and businesses, especially multinational corporations (MNCs), International organized crime and drug groups and International paramilitary and

The Threat Of Nuclear Proliferation Essay

1253 words - 5 pages unpredictable. A terrorist employment of a nuclear arm would not occur during an organized conflict; rather it would be used in a terrorist attack without warning. And due to the growing fervor of fundamental religious terrorism, there is a greater willingness among terrorists to sacrifice their own lives in pursuit of their goals. These combined elements create a frightening world in which today’s most astounding new threat possesses weapons of the most

Nuclear Proliferation And U.S. Grand Strategy

1486 words - 6 pages firmly believes that its security depends on nuclear weapons, it is almost impossible to prevent it from acquiring them. But the fact is, nuclear weapons spread very slowly, instead of proliferating like wildfire. Considering, for example, since the U.S. bombed the first nuclear bomb, we only have 9 countries with nuclear weapons. In addition, no existing nuclear states would want terrorists to get nuclear weapons from them. Terrorism is not steadily

Is Nuclear War A Possibility. Essay

1669 words - 7 pages came to light as the Russian ships turned around, and left Cuban Waters. Whether or not the two sides would have launched nuclear attacks at each other if the Russians' had not retreated remains debatable. However what persuaded the Russian's to turn around and Kennedy to begin a blockade, not launch a nuclear weapon, is likely to have been the frightening possibilities of what lay ahead; a full blown nuclear war.The likelihood of a full-blown