Nuclear Weapon Funding In Us Defense Budget

2509 words - 10 pages

The United States is currently spending $35 Billion a year; which is 14% of the defense budget, or it is $96 million a day, because of the nuclear efforts of which about $25 million goes for operation and maintenance for the nuclear arsenal. The rest of the money is spent on cleanup, arms control verification, and ballistic missile research, which all of that, just adds to the cost greatly. President Obama revealed a budget that includes more than $220 million in cuts for nuclear security programs in the next fiscal year. One of the largest reductions is going to come to the International Material Protection and Cooperation program, and which it works to secure and eliminate the vulnerable nuclear weapons and materials. President Obama asked for $ 3.5 million or $114 million less than was appropriated in the 2014 budget. President Obama has also requested $108 million less than was appropriated last year for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative; this is a program that actually plays a key part in the “Energy Department’s effort at preventing terrorist from obtaining nuclear and radiological materials that could be used in weapons of mass destruction” (Silverberg). Should the U.S. Congress amend the D.O.D. Appropriations Act of 2015 to eliminate funding for nuclear weapons production?
“President Obama’s FY2014 base budget request of $552.0 billion in discretionary budget Authority for the Department of Defense (DOD) and defense-related programs of other agencies (excluding war costs), exceeded by $53.9 billion the legally binding cap on defense funding for FY2014 that was enacted in 2011 as part of the BCA.” Similarly, in their initial actions on the annual defense funding bills for FY2014, the House and the Armed Services and Appropriations Committees of the Senate approved defense funding totals (excluding war costs) that were very close to President Obama’s so-called “base budget” (non-war) request, regardless of the BCA cap” (Pat Towell, Amy Belasco). With the proposed cuts, some nuclear security experts now question whether Obama, who made nuclear security a pet issue during his time in the Senate and launched the biennial Nuclear Security Summit process, remains committed to the issue. With having proposed cuts, some of the nuclear security experts are now questioning whether President Obama, who was the one that made nuclear security a “pet” issue during his time in the Senate and launched the biennial Nuclear Security process, it remains attached to the issue. “Launching the Nuclear Security Summit process in Washington in 2010, the Obama administration notes that 12 countries have disposed of their highly enriched uranium stockpiles, many countries are endorsing international requirements of nuclear security and 19 countries have launched a counter nuclear smuggling initiative. “The Obama administration is currently weighing cuts in US nuclear forces,” a (USCCB) action alerts states. “Within weeks, the President will be...

Find Another Essay On Nuclear Weapon Funding in US Defense Budget

Nuclear Weapons- A Possible End to Civilization

3011 words - 12 pages States counteract with the development and improvement in strategic weapons. Regional conflicts between neighboring nations become an incentive for research and development of nuclear weapons. Many nations develop nuclear weapons as a defense against neighboring weapon nations. The lobbying of military weapons has strongly promoted the funding of money and resources to develop new weapons systems. Another subtle factor of the Arms Race is the

America: Rogue Superpower Essay

2999 words - 12 pages , which said, "Canada and the Russian Federation agree that the 1972 Antiballistic Missile Treaty is a cornerstone of strategic stability and an important foundation for international efforts on nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation." (New York Times). The 1972 ABM treaty to this day prohibits the US and Russia from deploying a nationwide defense system (Lewis 36). In May 2001 President Bush went as far as calling for the canceling of the 1972

United States Nuclear Arsenal.

661 words - 3 pages UNITED STATES NUCLEAR ARSENAL"Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." said Robert Oppenheimer, one of the many scientists who assisted in the development of the nuclear bomb. He knew that he created a weapon so deadly that it could force the end of mankind. The United States has been the only country to drop a nuclear bomb on another country and when it did it was disastrous. The two Japanese cities that the bombs were drop on were

National Missile Defense

4347 words - 17 pages deliberate) with funding subject to the annual authorization of appropriations and the annual appropriation of funds for National Missile Defense.”2 Examples of these policies adopt proactive actions to defend the American homeland that is increasingly threatened with nuclear proliferation in the world, especially among our enemies. NMD is not compliant with ABM Treaty 1972. ABM Treaty in short constraints the deployment of nationwide defenses

Nuclear Weapons

1927 words - 8 pages with the same nuclear weapon. But if that is the case, then there is at least one country not using nuclear weapon for self-defense purpose but to create war and destroy human race. The military defense instrument reasoning turned to be unjustified.It would be illogical to assume a world with no war and subsequently argue that, since there would be no war, nuclear weapons are useless and should be eliminated. If there is more than one person in

Nuclear Weaponry

1260 words - 5 pages as crimes against humanity" (“The Effects of Nuclear Weapons”) . Nevertheless, the worst part is that the pollution propagates and does not only occur in the area where the uranium or nuclear weapon is being developed. One would think that only the US and Russia, two of the biggest nuclear contributors, encompass a massive amount of contamination and pollution, but neighboring areas such as nuclear testing in the South Pacific, Kazakhstan, China

Missile Defense Agency's Strategic Plan Analysis

1465 words - 6 pages funding for National Missile Defense, NMD. In 2001, President George W. Bush pulled out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile, ABM Treaty of 1972 which was an attempt to stop the US and Russia from pursuing a NMD system. Now the race was on to develop a NMD system to protect the US from Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles, ICBMs. In 2002, The BMDO was renamed the Missile Defense Agency or MDA.MDA's MissionThe Missile Defense Agency's mission is to develop

The Discontinuation of Nuclear Weaponry Creation

2076 words - 9 pages nuclear arms in order to maintain an arsenal enough for defense of the country. Deterrence in the United States provides safety for both the US and its allies. While this belief has a logical reason for nuclear weapon creation, the US and other countries should work to abolish this precedent to allow for a complete nuclear weapon free world. The idea of a nuclear weapon free world seems impossible but there are many people who have theorized ways to


703 words - 3 pages aren't that fond of the United States, because of all of the wars we have waged with them. Consequently now that there are nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons the United States is high at risk. The United States spends lots of money on the Star Wars missile defense system. The system when finished will be able to shoot down any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapon shot at us using space technology like satellites and lasers (The War

Government's missile defense.

762 words - 3 pages dollars, perhaps trillions. The current MDA budget for 2003 is 8 billion dollars. Every year this budget continues to increase. Should the Government spend this money on ways to control worldwide nuclear arms? Because of the immense destructiveness of nuclear weapons, missile defense would make virtually no difference in the outcome of an attack by several hundred missiles. Suppose the U.S. were attacked with 500 nuclear missiles by a major

A Nuclear Waste Race: Perspectives on Reprocessing Spent Fuel

1304 words - 5 pages energy was in the form of a highly effective and destructive weapon, therefore giving a distinct aura around the possibilities of nuclear development. Nuclear power had been operational and seemingly unscathed for almost fifty years, prior to the events that occurred in the late 1970’s. The vast political and social debates surrounding the alternative energy source arose from three major events in history. First was the release of the movie

Similar Essays

"To Cut Or Not To Cut" National Debt And Budget Deficit In The Us.

1401 words - 6 pages World War II and the Korean War. Next comes the costs of the Warin Vietnam in the mid-1960s and 1970s along with LBJ's Great Society Programs. Thistrend of big spending continued on through the until the end of the 1980s under Reagan'sCold War programs. With the Cold War over, and the United States recognized as theworld's only superpower, the defense budget is now being cut. But despite these cuts,experts estimate that up through the year 2005, we

The United States Road Map To World Peace And Security

1100 words - 4 pages , end to nuclear testing, better international treaties on nuclear non-proliferation, and plan to put away nuclear weapons from the hands of the terrorists. The President said for the year 2010, the U.S. Defense Department will cut back budget for nuclear funding in the amount of $50 billion per year, which can be diverted in other critical programs of the United States (815). The United Nations have sought long for a nuclear-free world and now

The Threat Of Nuclear Proliferation Essay

1253 words - 5 pages , economic, and social success, the US has been elevated to the forefront of the global community. A defense budget of $401.7 billion makes the United States the dominant military force in the world, (2005 US Federal Budget). Furthermore, our history of success has established a general sentiment of invincibility among American citizens, and an attack on our civilian population would have tremendous ramifications, as was seen with the occurrence

Nuclear Deterrence Is The Best Defense Against Nuclear War

1240 words - 5 pages Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War In 1945, a great technological innovation was dropped over Japan, the atomic bomb. Ever since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world has faced the threat of nuclear attack. In reaction to this, world governments have been forced to find a defense against nuclear attack. One solution to the danger of nuclear attack is the use of nuclear deterrence. Nuclear deterrence is